Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:30:56.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Population dynamics of the Dexter breed of cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. B. Young
G. B. Young
Affiliation:
Animal Breeding Research Organization, South Oswald Road, Edinburgh 9
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. It is possible for a breed of cattle to persist and to expand slowly, despite the existence of a genetic defect which prevents 50% of the calves born being used for breeding. Moreover, it is possible to exert a certain amount of selection in such a breed. The Dexter breed provides an example.

2. Before 1924, about 64% of entrants to the breed were from inspected animals. Between 1924 and 1939 the breed contracted. From 1940 to 1947 the breed expanded.

3. During the period of decline almost every Dexter-type female born was registered and raised. The wastage rate and age distribution of the cows are similar in Dexters to those of other breeds. There would appear to have been comparatively little breeding from Kerry types. The average registered reproductive rate of Dexter-type females was about 0·8.

4. While it was not possible to examine the breed structure in the period of expansion, this was probably accomplished by lengthening the average productive life of the female, and possibly also by breeding from Kerry types.

5. The possibility of exercising selection in Dexters is shown to exist. Only about 13% of the females registered are used for producing registered bulls. Of the total bull crop, only about 7% are used to produce registered females, but the bulls selected have different numbers of offspring. The use of bulls selected after progeny testing is hardly feasible in Dexters. The increased numbers of females necessary in order to produce an adequate number of heifers, renders this technique almost impossible.

6. There has been little inbreeding in Dexters. This is possibly due to deliberate policy, as some of the breeders associate inbreeding with the production of monstrous calves.

7. It would, therefore, appear that the damaging effect of a lethal in a breed could be overemphasized.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , July 1953 , pp. 369 - 374
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Crew, F. A. E. (1923). Proc. Roy. Soc. 95, 228.Google Scholar
Donald, H. P. (1945). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 13, 169.Google Scholar
Donald, H. P. & El Itriby, A. A. (1945). J. Agric. Sci. 35, 84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, H. P. & El Itriby, A. A. (1946). J. Agric. Sci. 36, 100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milk Marketing Board (1947). Annual Report.Google Scholar
Pettit, G. H. N. (1940). J. Agric. Sci. 30, 485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rendel, J. M. & Robertson, A. (1950). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 18, 49.Google Scholar
Rendel, J. M., Robertson, A. & Alim, K. A. (1951). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 19, 295.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. & Asker, A. A. (1951). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 19, 191.Google Scholar
Wiener, G. (1950). Aspects of Population Dynamics in Pedigree Ayrshire Cattle. Thesis. University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Young, G. B. (1951). Vet. Rec. 63, 635.Google Scholar