Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:12:39.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Planting pattern and irrigation effects on water status of winter wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2016

G. Y. WANG ,
X. B. ZHOU  and
Y. H. CHEN
G. Y. WANG
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Agricultural College of Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, People's Republic of China College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, People's Republic of China
X. B. ZHOU*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Agricultural College of Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, People's Republic of China
Y. H. CHEN
Affiliation:
College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, People's Republic of China
*
* To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effects of planting pattern and irrigation on the soil water content, stomatal conductance, leaf relative water content, leaf water potential and leaf water use efficiency of winter wheat were investigated in North China during the 2008/09 and 2009/10 growing seasons. A field experiment was conducted using a randomized complete block design that consisted of three planting patterns: (i) a uniform row spacing of 25 cm, and alternating wide–narrow row spacing of 40 and 20 cm tested as (ii) flat and (iii) furrow–ridge seedbeds. In addition, irrigation treatments of 90, 135 and 180 mm were used. The planting pattern, irrigation treatments and interactions between them significantly affected soil water content, stomatal conductance, leaf relative water content, leaf water potential and leaf water use efficiency. The soil water content, stomatal conductance, leaf relative water content, leaf water potential, grains/spike, thousand grain weight, leaf water use efficiency and yield were highest in the furrow–ridge seedbed planting pattern and increased with increasing irrigation (except for the leaf water use efficiency). The leaf water use efficiency in the 135 mm irrigation treatment was significantly greater than in the other treatments. In addition, soil water content, stomatal conductance, leaf relative water content, leaf water potential, grains/spike and thousand grain weight were positively correlated with leaf water use efficiency and yield of winter wheat. The interaction between the furrow–ridge seedbed planting pattern and 135 mm irrigation increased soil water content, leaf water indices, grains/spike, thousand grain weight, leaf water use efficiency and yield. These results indicated that a beneficial response occurred for wheat yield. The furrow–ridge seedbed planting pattern combined with 135 mm of irrigation improved the soil and leaf water status and could increase wheat yield while using less water.

Type
Crops and Soils Research Papers
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 154 , Issue 8 , November 2016 , pp. 1362 - 1377
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aasamaa, K. & Sõber, A. (2011). Stomatal sensitivities to changes in leaf water potential, air humidity, CO2 concentration and light intensity, and the effect of abscisic acid on the sensitivities in six temperate deciduous tree species. Environmental and Experimental Botany 71, 72–78.Google Scholar
Álvarez, S., Navarro, A., Nicolás, E. & Sánchez-Blanco, M. J. (2011). Net transpiration rateanspiration, photosynthetic responses, tissue water relations and dry mass partitioning in Callistemon plants during drought conditions. Scientia Horticulturae 129, 306–312.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. K. (1992). Increasing grain yield and water use of wheat in a rainfed Mediterranean type environment. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 43, 1–17.Google Scholar
Angadi, S. V. & Entz, M. H. (2002). Root system and water use patterns of different height sunflower cultivars. Agronomy Journal 94, 136–145.Google Scholar
Aydi, S. S., Aydi, S., Gonzalez, E. & Abdelly, C. (2008). Osmotic stress affects water relations, growth, and nitrogen fixation in Phaseolus vulgaris plants. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 30, 441–449.Google Scholar
Bandyopadhyay, P. K., Mallick, S. & Rana, S. K. (2005). Water balance and crop coefficients of summer-grown peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in a humid tropical region of India. Irrigation Science 23, 161–169.Google Scholar
Bhagsari, A. S. & Brown, R. H. (1986). Leaf photosynthesis and its correlation with leaf area. Crop Science 26, 127–132.Google Scholar
Bousba, R., Ykhlef, N. & Djekoun, A. (2009). Water use efficiency and flag leaf photosynthetic in response to water deficit of durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf). World Journal Agricultural Sciences 5, 609–616.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, N., Marschner, P. & Burns, R. (2011). Response of microbial activity and community structure to decreasing soil osmotic and matric potential. Plant and Soil 344, 241–254.Google Scholar
Condon, A. G., Richards, R. A., Rebetzke, G. J. & Farquhar, G. D. (2002). Improving intrinsic water-use efficiency and crop yield. Crop Science 42, 122–131.Google Scholar
Dandan, Z., Jiayin, S., Kun, L., Quanru, L. & Quanqi, L. (2013). Effects of irrigation and wide-precision planting on water use, radiation interception, and grain yield of winter wheat in the North China Plain. Agricultural Water Management 118, 87–92.Google Scholar
Deng, X. P., Shan, L., Zhang, H. P. & Turner, N. C. (2006). Improving agricultural water use efficiency in arid and semiarid areas of China. Agricultural Water Management 80, 23–40.Google Scholar
Everitt, B. S. & Hothorn, T. (2010). A Handbook of Statistical Analyses using R. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Fahong, W., Xuqing, W. & Sayre, K. (2004). Comparison of conventional, flood irrigated, flat planting with furrow irrigated, raised bed planting for winter wheat in China. Field Crops Research 87, 35–42.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. A., Rees, D., Sayre, K. D., Lu, Z. M., Condon, A. G. & Saavedra, A. L. (1998). Wheat yield progress associated with higher stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rate, and cooler canopies. Crop Science 38, 1467–1475.Google Scholar
Franca, M. G. C., Thi, A. T. P., Pimentel, C., Rossiello, R. O. P., Zuily-Fodi, Y. & Laffray, D. (2000). Differences in growth and water relations among Phaseolus vulgaris cultivars in response to induced drought stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany 43, 227–237.Google Scholar
Galmés, J., Flexas, J., Savé, R. & Medrano, H. (2007). Water relations and stomatal characteristics of Mediterranean plants with different growth forms and leaf habits: responses to water stress and recovery. Plant and Soil 290, 139–155.Google Scholar
Gunasekera, D. & Berkowitz, G. A. (1992). Evaluation of contrasting cellular-level acclimation responses to leaf water deficits in three wheat genotypes. Plant Science 86, 1–12.Google Scholar
Hawk, P. B., Oser, B. L. & Summerson, W. H. (1954). Practical Physiological Chemistry, 13th edn. New York: The Blakiston Company, Division of McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
Huang, J., Chen, Y. H., Zhou, X. B., Liu, P., Bi, J. J. & Ouyang, Z. (2013). Spatial arrangement effects on soil and leaf water status of winter wheat. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 23, 1379–1384.Google Scholar
Khakwani, A. A., Dennett, M. D., Munir, M. & Baloch, M. S. (2012). Wheat yield response to physiological limitations under water stress condition. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 22, 773–780.Google Scholar
Martìınez, J. P., Lutts, S., Schanck, A., Bajji, M. & Kinet, J. M. (2004). Is osmotic adjustment required for water stress resistance in the Mediterranean shrub Atriplex halimus L.? Journal of Plant Physiology 161, 1041–1051.Google Scholar
Mishra, H. S., Rathore, T. R. & Savita, U. S. (2001). Water-use efficiency of irrigated winter maize under cool weather conditions of India. Irrigation Science 21, 27–33.Google Scholar
Motzo, R., Pruneddu, G. & Giunta, F. (2013). The role of stomatal conductance for water and radiation use efficiency of durum wheat and triticale in a Mediterranean environment. European Journal of Agronomy 44, 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, D. W. & Sommers, L. E. (1982). Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbial Properties, 2nd edn (Eds Page, A. L., Miller, R. H. & Keeney, D. R.), pp. 539–580. Agronomy Monograph 9. Madison, WI: ASA-SSSA.Google Scholar
Olsen, S. R., Cole, C. V., Watanabe, F. S. & Dean, L. A. (1954). Estimation of Available Phosphorus in Soils by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate. Circular no. 939. Washington, DC: USDA.Google Scholar
Rampino, P., Pataleo, S., Gerardi, C., Mita, G. & Perrotta, C. (2006). Drought stress response in wheat physiological and molecular analysis of resistant and sensitive genotypes. Plant, Cell and Environment 29, 2143–2152.Google Scholar
Pratt, P. F. (1965). Potassium. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties (Ed. Black, C. A.), pp. 1023–1030. Madison, WI: ASA-SSSA.Google Scholar
Sacks, W. J., Deryng, D., Foley, J. A. & Ramankutty, N. (2010). Crop planting dates: an analysis of global patterns. Global Ecology and Biogeography 19, 607–620.Google Scholar
Santesteban, L. G., Miranda, C. & Royo, J. B. (2009). Effect of water deficit and rewatering on leaf gas exchange and transpiration decline of excised leaves of four grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae 121, 434–439.Google Scholar
SAS Institute (2009). User's Guide. SAS software, Version 9.2. Cary, NC: SAS Inst.Google Scholar
Souza, B. D., Meiado, M. V., Rodrigues, B. M. & Santos, M. G. (2010). Water relations and chlorophyll fluorescence responses of two leguminous trees from the Caatinga to different watering regimes. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 32, 235–244.Google Scholar
Tanwar, S. P. S., Rao, S. S., Regar, P. L., Datt, S., Praveen-Kumar, , Jodha, B. S., Santra, P., Kumar, R. & Ram, R. (2014). Improving water and land use efficiency of fallow-wheat system in shallow Lithic Calciorthid soils of arid region: introduction of bed planting and rainy season sorghum–legume intercropping. Soil and Tillage Research 138, 44–55.Google Scholar
Timlin, D., Pachepsky, Y. & Reddy, V. R. (2001). Soil water dynamics in row and interrow positions in soybean (Glycine max L.). Plant and Soil 237, 25–35.Google Scholar
Wang, G. Y., Han, Y. Y., Zhou, X. B., Chen, Y. H. & Ouyang, Z. (2014). Planting pattern and irrigation effects on water-use efficiency of winter wheat. Crop Science 54, 1166–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, X. L. & Bao, W. K. (2012). Statistical analysis of leaf water use efficiency and physiology traits of winter wheat under drought condition. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 11, 82–89.Google Scholar
Xia, J., Zhang, S., Guo, J., Rong, Q. & Zhang, G. (2015). Critical effects of gas exchange parameters in Tamarix chinensis Lour on soil water and its relevant environmental factors on a shell ridge island in China's Yellow River Delta. Ecological Engineering 76, 36–46.Google Scholar
Yu, G. R., Miwa, T., Nakayama, K., Matsuoka, N. & Kon, H. (2000). A proposal for universal formulas for estimating leaf water status of herbaceous and woody plants based on spectral reflectance properties. Plant and Soil 227, 47–58.Google Scholar
Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T. & Konzak, C. F. (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.Google Scholar
Zhang, Z. B., Shao, H. B., Xu, P., Chu, L. Y., Lu, Z. H. & Tian, J. Y. (2007). On evolution and perspectives of bio-watersaving. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 55, 1–9.Google Scholar
Zhou, X. B., Chen, Y. H. & Ouyang, Z. (2015). Spacing between rows: effects on water-use efficiency of double-cropped wheat and soybean. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 153, 90–101.Google Scholar
Zuo, Q., Shi, J., Li, Y. & Zhang, R. (2006). Root length density and water uptake distributions of winter wheat under sub-irrigation. Plant and Soil 285, 45–55.Google Scholar