Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:09:12.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Physiological analysis of growth and yield variation of rapeseed and mustard

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Y. S. Chauhan  and
S. C. Bhargava
Y. S. Chauhan
Affiliation:
Division of Plant Physiology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India
S. C. Bhargava
Affiliation:
Division of Plant Physiology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Rapeseed and mustard crops are the second most important source of edible oil after groundnut in India. The average yield of these crops is around 600 kg/ha which has been static for several years. These low yields are of increasing concern in view of the short supply of oil seeds in India. Considerable breeding efforts are being directed to improving production potential as well as stability of yield in these crops (Prakash, 1980). An understanding of the physiological basis of yield formation can be of great help in selecting for high and stable yields. However, there is little information available on the production physiology of these crops (Mehrotra, Saxena & Moosa, 1976; Bhargava & Tomar, 1982).

Type
Short Notes
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 103 , Issue 1 , August 1984 , pp. 249 - 252
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, E. J. & Morgan, D. G. (1975). A quantitative comparison of growth, development and yield of different varieties of oilseed rape. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 85, 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhargava, S. C. & Tomar, D. P. S. (1982). Physiological basis of yield improvement in rapeseed-mustard. Proceedings of Indo-Swedish joint workshop on rapeseed-mustard, Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, New Delhi, pp. 33–41.Google Scholar
Chauhan, Y. S. (1980). Physiological investigations on the productivity of Brassica ecotypes, Ph.D. thesis, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
Mehrotra, O. N., Saxena, H. K. & Moosa, M. (1976). Physiological analysis of varietal differences in seed yield of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern and Coss). Indian Journal of Plant Physiology 19, 139–146.Google Scholar
Prakash, S. (1980). Cruciferous oilseeds in India. In Brassica Crops and Wild Allies, Biology and Breeding (ed. Tsunoda, S., Hinata, K. and Campo, C. Gomez), pp. 151–163. Tokyo: Japan Scientific Soc. Press.Google Scholar
Sinha, S. K., Bhargava, S. C. & Goel, A. (1982). Energy as the basis of harvest index. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 99, 237–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar