Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:37:49.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The performance of Ongole heifers grazing native and introduced pasture species at Sumba, Indonesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

I. G. W. Rudolf
Affiliation:
Forage Research Project, Department of Agronomy & Soil Science, University of New England, Armidale, N.S.W. 2351, Australia.
G. Blair
Affiliation:
Forage Research Project, Department of Agronomy & Soil Science, University of New England, Armidale, N.S.W. 2351, Australia.
P. W. Orchard
Affiliation:
Forage Research Project, Department of Agronomy & Soil Science, University of New England, Armidale, N.S.W. 2351, Australia.
A. R. Til
Affiliation:
Forage Research Project, Department of Agronomy & Soil Science, University of New England, Armidale, N.S.W. 2351, Australia.
M. Hunt
Affiliation:
Forage Research Project, Department of Agronomy & Soil Science, University of New England, Armidale, N.S.W. 2351, Australia.

Summary

An experiment was conducted to examine the effect of fertilizer (triple superphosphate) and stocking rate on animal and pasture productivity on Sumba Island, Eastern Indonesia. The Ongole heifers used in the 1-year experiment gained weight during the wet season and lost weight during the dry season at stocking rates of 0·5 and 1·0 head/ha when grazing native Themeda pasture. The dryseason weight loss was arrested when a prepared seed-bed pasture, which contained 21 % Siratro at the start of the experiment was grazed at a stocking rate of 1·5 head/ha. Increasing the stocking rate to 2·5 head/ha on this pasture resulted in an increase, in the weed component of the pasture from 12 to 84% in 1 year.

The mineral content of plucked samples of pasture indicated that levels of Ca and Mg were generally adequate for growing beef cattle and that Na supplementation would be beneficial. Plant N concentration was below 1·5% in the Themeda and Imperatacomponent but above this in the legume at the prepared seed-bed site. The P concentration in the Themeda and Imperata was always below the 0·24 % level required by cattle, as it was in the legume at the end of the experiment.

The introduction of herbaceous legumes into pastures under set stocking conditions can lead to pasture instability.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bonnemaison, P. (1961). Grassland and Fodder Development in Indonesia. Report to Government of Indonesia, FAO No. 1448.Google Scholar
Bryan, W. W. & Evans, T. R. (1973). Effects of soils, fertilizers and stocking rates of pasture and beef production of the Wallum of South-eastern Queensland. 1. Botanical composition and chemical effects on plants and soils. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 13, 516529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eng, P. K., T'Mannetje, L. & Chen, C. P. (1978). Effects of phosphorus and stocking rate on pasture and animal production from a Guinea-legume pasture in Johore, Malaysia. 2. Animal liveweight change. Tropical Grasslands 12, 198207.Google Scholar
Falvey, L. & Andrews, A. (1979). Improved pastures in the Thai Highlands. Tropical Grasslands 12, 154156.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization (1984). Production Yearbook 1984. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Gillard, P. (1970). Pasture development in the dry tropics of North Queensland. Proceedings of the Wth International Grassland Congress, Surfers Paradise, Queensland, Australia, p. 807.Google Scholar
Grof, B. & Harding, W. A. T. (1970). Dry matter yields and animal production of Guinea grass (Panicum maximum) on the humid tropical coast of North Queensland. Tropical Grasslands 4, 8595.Google Scholar
Little, D. A. (1981). Utilization of minerals. In Nutritional Limits to Animal Production from Pastures(ed.) Hacker, J. B.. UK: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau.Google Scholar
Magadan, P. B., Javier, Q. & Madamba, C. (1974). Beef production on Native (Imperata cylindica[L.] Beauv) and Para Grass (Brachiaria mutica[Forsk.] Stapf) pastures in the Philippines. Proceedings of the 12th International Grassland Congress, Moscow, Vol. III, Part I, p. 293.Google Scholar
Mott, G. O. (1960). Grazing pressure and the measurement of pasture production. Proceedings of the Sth International Grassland Congress, Reading, England, p 606.Google Scholar
Norman, M. J. T. (1965). Season performance of beef cattle on native pasture at Katherine, N.T. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 5, 227231.Google Scholar
Norman, M. J. T. (1959). Performance of beef cattle on native and sown pasture at Katherine, N.T. CSIRO Australia, Division of Land Research and Regional Survey, Technical Paper No. 4.Google Scholar
Playne, M. J. (1970). The sodium concentration in some tropical pasture species with reference to animal requirements. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 10, 3235.Google Scholar
Shaw, H. H. (1978). Superphosphate and stocking rate effects on a native pasture oversown with Stylosanthes humilis in the central coastal Queensland. 1. Pasture production. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 18, £788–807.Google Scholar
Soepraptohardjo, M. (1972). The Land Use Map of Indonesia 1972. Bogor, Indonesia: Soil Research Institute.Google Scholar
Soerjani, M. (1970). Alang-alang (Imperata cylindica[L.J Beauv) pattern of growth as related to its problem of control. Bogor, Indonesia: Biotrop Bullein No. 1.Google Scholar
Tillman, A. D. (1981). Animal Agriculture in Indonesia. Winrock International, Winrock International Livestock Research and Training Center, Petit Jean Mountain, Morrilton, Arkansas, U.S.A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
T'Mannetje, L. & Haydock, K. P. (1963). The dry weight rank method for the botanical analysis of pasture. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 268275.Google Scholar