Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:18:23.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Onset of puberty and the inflection point of the growth curve in sheep – Brody's Law revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2008

W. PITTROFF ,
F. DAHM ,
F. BLANC ,
D. KEISLER  and
T. C. CARTWRIGHT
W. PITTROFF*
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis, USA
F. DAHM
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University, College Station, USA
F. BLANC
Affiliation:
ENITA Clermont-Ferrand, France
D. KEISLER
Affiliation:
University of Missouri, Columbia, USA
T. C. CARTWRIGHT
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University, College Station, USA
*
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Brody (1945) concluded that the inflection point of the growth curve of domestic animals coincides with the onset of puberty and is coupled with an increase in proportion of fat gain at that time. This purported coincidence of growth inflection and onset of puberty has been termed the ‘Brody Law’. Recent findings suggesting a pivotal role of body energy reserves, communicated by the metabolic hormone leptin, on the onset of puberty led to the hypothesis that sheep must reach the inflection point of growth (AIP) considerably before the onset of puberty (AOP). In order to test this hypothesis, growth curves were fitted for ewe lambs on different growth trajectories from two experiments. Both experiments examined the effect of growth trajectory on AOP in ewe lambs. One data set was developed in France with Merino sheep; the other came from two distinct genetic lines of Targhee sheep in the USA. The French experiment subjected ewe lambs to two different feeding levels, while the USA experiment compared two nutritional regimens differing in both energy and protein concentration.

Several non-linear models described in the literature as potentially useful for modelling weight–age relationships were fitted. The Logistic function was identified as the superior model for all datasets. All animals in both experiments reached AIP considerably before AOP. AOP was defined using two criteria threshold levels of progesterone as AOP1 ⩾0·5 ng/ml and AOP2 ⩾1 ng/ml progesterone. For the USA data, multivariate analysis of AIP, AOP1 and AOP2 demonstrated that nutritional treatment was highly significant; this was also the case for the multivariate analysis of AIP, degree of maturity at AOP1 (DOM1) and DOM2. The correlation between AIP and DOM was highly negative. In contrast, the feeding treatment in the French experiments had no effect on any of the response variables except estimated mature weight. However, AIP was negatively correlated with DOM1 and DOM2. AOP was highly positively correlated with DOM. Most notably, AIP was not correlated with AOP1 or AOP2 in either experiment, and all animals reached AIP considerably before AOP1. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that growing female sheep must reach a certain minimum level of body fatness before the onset of puberty. Genetic group and nutritional treatment significantly affect growth curve parameters; hence, the age at which this (currently unknown) level is reached must strongly depend on nutritional regimen. It is concluded that growth modelling per se cannot be used to infer onset of puberty, and that endocrine thresholds do not necessarily demarcate distinct phases of the growth curve.

Type
Modelling Animal Systems Paper
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 146 , Issue 3 , June 2008 , pp. 239 - 250
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blackburn, H. D. & Cartwright, T. C. (1987). Description and validation of the Texas A&M sheep simulation model. Journal of Animal Science 65, 373–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanc, F., Fabre, D., Bocquier, F., Canepa, S., Delavaud, C., Caraty, A., Chilliard, Y. & Debus, N. (2006). Effect of a post-weaning restricted nutrition on the initiation of puberty, plasma leptin and the reproductive performances of early bred Merino ewe-lambs. In 11th Seminar of the FAO-CIHEAM Sub-Network on Sheep and Goat Nutrition. Advanced Nutrition and Feeding Strategies to Improve Sheep and Goat Production. Catania (Italy), 8–10 September 2005. Sicily, Italy: Faculty of Agriculture, University of Catania.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. (1989). Energy Metabolism in Animals and Man. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brody, S. (1945). Bioenergetics and Growth with Special Reference to the Efficiency Complex in Domestic Animals. First published: Reinhold, NY. Reprinted: Hafner Publishing Co., Inc. NY. 1964Google Scholar
Dhanoa, M. S., Lister, S. J., France, J. & Barnes, R. J. (1999). Use of mean square prediction error analysis and reproducibility measures to study near infrared calibration equation performance. Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy 7, 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickerson, G. E. & Laster, D. B. (1975). Breed, heterosis and environmental influences on growth and puberty in ewe lambs. Journal of Animal Science 41, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doren, P. E., Baker, J. F., Long, C. R. & Cartwright, T. C. (1989). Estimating parameters of growth curves of bulls. Journal of Animal Science 67, 1432–1445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gates, C. E. & Dahm, P. F. (1989). Fitting growth models to repeated measures data. In Applications of Mixed Models in Agriculture and Related Disciplines (Ed. Koonce, K.), pp. 174–182. Baton Rouge, LA, USA: Department of the Experimental Station, Louisiana State University.Google Scholar
Grossmann, M. & Bohren, B. B. (1985). Logistic growth curve of chickens: heritability of parameters. The Journal of Heredity 78, 459–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
INRA (2007). Alimentation des Bovines, Ovins et Caprins. Besoins des Animaux-Valeurs des Aliments. Tables INRA 2007. Editions QUAE. Paris, France: INRA.Google Scholar
Keisler, D. H., Inskeep, E. K. & Daily, R. A. (1983). First luteal tissue in ewe lambs: influence on subsequent ovarian activities and response to hysterectomy. Journal of Animal Science 57, 150–156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laster, D. B., Smith, G. M. & Gregory, K. E. (1976). Characterization of biological types of cattle. IV. Postweaning growth and puberty of heifers. Journal of Animal Science 43, 63–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Littell, R. C., Henry, P. R. & Ammerman, C. B. (1998). Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. Journal of Animal Science 76, 1216–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez, S., France, J., Gerrits, W. J. J., Dhanoa, M. S., Humphries, D. J. & Dijkstra, J. (2000). A generalized Michaelis–Menten equation for the analysis of growth. Journal of Animal Science 78, 1816–1828.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, C. X., Casella, G. & Wu, R. L. (2002). Functional mapping of quantitative trait loci underlying the character process: a theoretical framework. Genetics 161, 1751–1762.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menchaca, M. A., Chase, C. C., Olson, T. A. & Hammond, A. C. (1996). Evaluation of growth curves of Brahman cattle of various frame sizes. Journal of Animal Science 74, 2140–2151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niklas, K. J. (1994). Plant Allometry: The Scaling of Form and Process. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
NRC (USA) (1996/2000). Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. Seventh Revised Edition. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Parks, J. R. (1982). A Theory of Feeding and Growth in Animals. Advanced Series in Agricultural Sciences 11. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Pinheiro, J. C. & Bates, D. M. (1995). Model Building for Nonlinear Mixed-effects Models. Technical Report 91. Wisconsin, USA: University of Wisconsin–Madison.Google Scholar
Pittroff, W., Keisler, D. & Lavoie, D. (2003). Dietary treatment effects on growth, reproduction, and circulating leptin levels of Targhee lambs. In Progress in Research on Energy and Protein Metabolism, International Symposium (Eds Souffrant, W. B. & Metges, C. C.), pp. 217–221. EAAP Publication No. 109. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratkowsky, D. A. (1983). Non-linear Regression Modelling: A Unified Practical Approach. New York, USA: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Rodda, B. E. (1981). Analysis of sets of estimates from pharmacokinetic studies. In Kinetic Data Analysis: Design and Analysis of Enzyme and Pharmacokinetic Experiments (Ed. Endrenyi, L.), pp. 285–298. New York, USA: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS (2004). SAS/STAT 9.1 User's Guide. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Schinckel, A. P. & De Lange, C. F. M. (1996). Characterization of growth parameters needed as inputs for pig growth models. Journal of Animal Science 74, 2021–2036.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sisk, C. L. & Foster, D. L. (2004). The neural basis of puberty and adolescence. Nature Neuroscience 7, 1040–1047.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suttie, J. M., Foster, D. L., Veenvliet, T. R., Manley, T. R. & Corson, I. D. (1991). Influence of food intake but independence of body weight on puberty in female sheep. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 92, 33–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terqui, M. & Thimonier, J. (1974). Nouvelle méthode radio-immunologique rapide pour l'estimation du niveau de progestérone plasmatique. Application pour le diagnostic précoce de la gestation chez la brebis et la chèvre. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences, D (Sciences Naturelles), 279, 1109–1112.Google Scholar
West, G. B., Brown, J. H. & Enquist, B. J. (2001). A general model of ontogenetic growth. Nature 413, 628–631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed