Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:12:22.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The nutritive value of roughages for sheep II. The relationship between the gross digestible energy and the chemical composition of silages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. M. Walker  and
W. R. Hepburn
D. M. Walker
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen, Scotland
W. R. Hepburn
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen, Scotland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The relationship existing between the gross digestible energy content and the chemical composition of twenty-four silages has been studied with nine Cheviot wether lambs over a period of 8 months.

2. Silages were made from grassland herbage and varied widely in the chemical composition of the ingoing material.

3. Each silage was fed to a group of three lambs for a 10-day preliminary- and a 9-day collectionperiod. Faeces and urine were collected in metabolism crates.

4. The silages were analysed for volatile acids and bases, for proximate nutrients and for some of the more precise chemical constituents as suggested in the scheme of analysis of Ferguson (1948).

5. A close relationship existed between the gross digestible energy contents of the silages and the lignin (Ellis) content.

6. The most accurate prediction of gross digestible energy was obtained by taking into account the content of lignin (Ellis), cellulose (Crampton & Maynard) and crude protein, in the silage.

7. In the case of hays (Walker & Hepburn, 1955) no increase in the accuracy of predicting gross digestible energy was obtained by estimating the lignin and cellulose content, rather than crude fibre alone. However, with silages the results give support to the opinion of Mitchell (1942) and Schneider et al. (1951) that analysis for more precise chemical constituents will increase the accuracy of predicting digestibility.

8. Crude fibre and cellulose were not related in any fixed way with the digestibility of energy. Crude fibre itself was digested to some 80% compared with 62% in hays.

9. Metabolizable energy was closely related to digestible energy.

10. The starch equivalents of the silages were calculated by conventional methods and also from the content of gross digestible energy.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , April 1956 , pp. 172 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aitken, J. N. (1955). Private communication.Google Scholar
Armitage, E. R., Ashworth, R. De B. & Ferguson, W. S. (1948). J. Soc. Chem. Ind., Lond., 67, 241.Google Scholar
A.O.A.C. (1950). Official and Tentative Methods of Analysis, 7th ed.Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Crampton, E. W. & Maynard, L. A. (1938). J. Nutr. 15, 383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, N. D. (1949). Versl. Landb. Onderzoek, no. 55, 10.Google Scholar
Dodsworth, T. L. (1954). J. Agric. Sci. 44, 383.Google Scholar
Ellis, G. H., Matrone, G. & Maynard, L. A. (1946). J. Anim. Sci. 5, 285.Google Scholar
Ferguson, W. S. (1948). Agric. Progr. 23, 129.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. B., Swift, R. W. & Bratzler, J. W. (1943). Bull. Pa Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 453.Google Scholar
Foreman, F. W. (1920). Biochem. J. 14, 451.Google Scholar
Foreman, F. W. (1928). Biochem. J. 22, 208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallsworth, E. G. (1949). J. Agric. Sci. 39, 254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallsworth, E. G. (1950). Agric. Progr. 25, 39.Google Scholar
Lofgreen, G. P. (1951). J. Anim. Sci. 10, 344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, W. (1941). J. Agric. Sci. 31, 518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, H. H. (1942). J. Anim. Sci. 1, 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, A. G. & Jenkins, S. H. (1933). Biochem. J. 27, 818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, B. H. (1947). Feeds of the World, their Digestibility and Composition.Google Scholar
Schneider, B. H., Lucas, H. L., Pavlech, H. M. & Cipolloni, M. A. (1951). J. Anim. Sci. 10, 706.Google Scholar
Swift, R. W., Bratzler, J. W., James, W. H., Tillman, A. D. & Meek, D. C. (1948). J. Anim. Sci. 7, 475.Google Scholar
Walker, D. M. & Hepburn, W. R. (1955). J. Agric. Sci. 45, 298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, S. J. & Ferguson, W. S. (1937). J. Agric. Sci. 27, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, H. E. (1925). J. Agric. Sci. 15, 343.Google Scholar