Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:48:07.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A note on the effect of different amounts of NaOH application on digestibility by cattle of barley, oats, wheat and maize

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

E. R. Ørskov
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB
B. J. Barnes
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB
B. A. Lukins
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB

Summary

The effect of different amounts of NaOH sprayed on whole grain on their digestibility by cattle was examined for barley, oats, maize and wheat. For all cereals the digestibility of fibre, dry matter and organic matter (OM) increased with increasing application of NaOH solution but responses were small at the highest levels used. The digestibility of OM was increased from 61 to 83% for barley, from 61 to 76% for oats, from 83 to 89% for maize and from 79 to 92% for wheat. The optimum amount of NaOH required differed between cereals, being about 3·0–3·5% for barley, 4·5–5·0% for oats, and 2·5–3·0% for maize and wheats. With oats, wheat and maize the digestibility was apparently increased more with NaOH treatment than by physical processing.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balch, C. C. (1950). Factors affecting the utilization of food by dairy cows. The rate of passage of food through the digestive tract. British Journal of Nutrition 4, 361388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ørskov, E. R. & Greenhalgh, J. F. D. (1977). Alkali treatment as a method of processing grain for cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 89, 253255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. & Grubb, D. A. (1977). The use of whole barley diet fortified with solutions of urea, minerals and vitamins for lambs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 2, 307314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Grubb, D. A. & Stirton, R. (1979). The effect of dry-matter concentration and preservation method of whole barley on feed utilization by early-weaned lambs. Animal Production 28, 431 (abstract).Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Macdearmid, A., Barnes, B. J., Grubb, D. A. & Lukins, B. A. (1979). Effect of sodium hydroxide treatment on digestibility of oats, barley, wheat and maize and on utilization of sodium hydroxide oats and barley by lambs and steers. Animal Production 28, 432 (abstract).Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Soliman, H. S. & Macdearmid, A. (1978). Intake of hay by cattle given supplements subjected to various forms of physical treatment or treatment with alkali. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90, 611615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Stewart, C. S. & Greenhalgh, J. F. D. (1979). The effect of sodium hydroxide and urea on some storage properties of moist grain. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 185188.Google Scholar
Thivend, P., Mercier, C. & Guillot, A. (1965). Dosage de l'amidon dans les milieux complexes. Annales de Biologie Animale Biochimie Biophysique 4, 513526.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. (1963). Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. II. A rapid method for determinations of fibre and lignin. Journal of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists 46, 829835.Google Scholar