Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T17:16:37.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Net energy values and starch values

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Henry Prentiss Armsby
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition, State College, Pennsylvania.
J. August Fries
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition, State College, Pennsylvania.

Extract

It is now accepted as a fundamental doctrine in animal nutrition that the prime function of food is to supply energy for the operation of the human or animal body and that all its other diverse uses are essentially tributary to this main purpose. The growing recognition of this fact in its relations to the nutrition of farm animals has given rise during the past twenty-five years to extensive investigations, especially by Zuntz and his associates, by Kellner and Köhler and by the writers, in which the attempt has been made to determine experimentally how much energy the various feeding stuffs can actually contribute toward the upkeep of the animal body.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1919

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 183 note 1 Compare Kellner, The Scientific Feeding of Farm Animals (Goodwin's translation), and Armsby, The Nutrition of Farm Animals, pp. 668672.Google Scholar

page 183 note 2 Journ. Agr. Research, 3 (1905), 486; The Nutrition of Farm Animals, pp. 673–675.Google Scholar

page 184 note 1 Feeds and Feeding, 15th ed., p. 660.

page 185 note 1 The Nutrition of Farm Animals, p. 660.

page 186 note 1 U.S. Dept. of Agr., Bur. Anim. Indus., Bull. No. 51.

page 186 note 2 Compare The Nutrition of Farm Animals, pp. 271–272.

page 187 note 1 Compare Ernährung landw. Nutztiere, 6th ed., pp. 105–109.

page 187 note 2 Journ. Agr. Research, 3 (1915), 472.Google Scholar