Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:09:31.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The medium-term effect of natural compost on the spectroscopic properties of humic acids of Czech soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2018

V. Enev ,
L. Doskočil ,
L. Kubíková  and
M. Klučáková Open the ORCID record for M. Klučáková [Opens in a new window]
V. Enev
Affiliation:
Materials Research Centre, Faculty of Chemistry, Brno University of Technology, Purkyňova 118, Brno, 612 00, Czech Republic
L. Doskočil
Affiliation:
Materials Research Centre, Faculty of Chemistry, Brno University of Technology, Purkyňova 118, Brno, 612 00, Czech Republic
L. Kubíková
Affiliation:
Materials Research Centre, Faculty of Chemistry, Brno University of Technology, Purkyňova 118, Brno, 612 00, Czech Republic
M. Klučáková*
Affiliation:
Materials Research Centre, Faculty of Chemistry, Brno University of Technology, Purkyňova 118, Brno, 612 00, Czech Republic
*
Author for correspondence: M. Klučáková, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the current work, humic acids (HAs) isolated from natural compost and unamended and amended soils in a medium-time field experiment were characterized to evaluate the effects of the amendment at rates of 124, 239 and 478 t/ha on their chemical, compositional and structural features. The impact of the application of compost on their properties was observed over 3 years. Humic acids were characterized using spectral methods and elemental analysis. Humic acid isolated from compost was predominantly aliphatic, with a larger content of nitrogen and low degree of aromaticity and humification. The typical maximum (280/345 nm) of HA obtained from compost lies within the T (tryptophan-like) region, which can be ascribed to proteinaceous organic materials. On the other hand, the HAs obtained from amended soil were mainly aromatic in character, with a larger distribution of oxygen-containing functional groups, molecular weight and greater aromaticity. Fluorophores of HAs obtained from amended soil lie within the C (humic-like) region with typical maxima centred in the range 430–450/500–540 nm, occurring usually in HAs isolated from soil, peat and lignite. According to ultra-violet/visible and Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, the larger oxygen contents of these HAs are associated with the substitution of aromatic rings by oxygen-containing functional groups such as carboxylic, hydroxyls and ethers. On the basis of FTIR spectra, it was shown that HAs obtained from amended soil 2 and 3 years after compost application were enriched by peptid, aromatic and polysaccharide compounds absorbing at 1540, 1515 and 1040/cm, respectively.

Keywords

Humic acidsluvic chernozemmedium-term timenatural compost amendmentprotein-like substances
Type
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 156 , Issue 7 , September 2018 , pp. 877 - 887
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adani, F, Genevini, P, Tambone, F and Montoneri, E (2006) Compost effect on soil humic acid: a NMR study. Chemosphere 65, 1414–1418.Google Scholar
Adani, F, Genevini, P, Ricca, G, Tambone, F and Montoneri, E (2007) Modification of soil humic matter after 4 years of compost application. Waste Management 27, 319–324.Google Scholar
Aguiar, NO, Olivares, FL, Novotny, EH, Dobbss, LB, Balmori, DM, Santos-Júnior, LG, Chagas, JG, Façanha, AR and Canellas, LP (2013) Bioactivity of humic acids isolated from vermicomposts at different maturation stages. Plant and Soil 362, 161–174.Google Scholar
Albaladejo, J, Stocking, M, Diaz, E and Castillo, V (1994) Land rehabilitation by urban refuse amendments in a semi-arid environment: effect on soil chemical properties. Soil Technology 7, 249–260.Google Scholar
Alberts, JJ and Takács, M (2004) Total luminescence spectra of IHSS standard and reference fulvic acids, humic acids and natural organic matter: comparison of aquatic and terrestrial source terms. Organic Geochemistry 35, 243–256.Google Scholar
Albrecht, R, Verrecchia, E and Pfeifer, H-R (2015) The use of solid-phase fluorescence spectroscopy in the characterisation of organic matter transformations. Talanta 134, 453–459.Google Scholar
Aranda, V, Ayora-Cañada, MJ, Domínguez-Vidal, A, Martín-García, JM, Calero, J, Delgado, R, Verdejo, T and González-Vila, FJ (2011) Effect of soil type and management (organic vs. conventional) on soil organic matter quality in olive groves in a semi-arid environment in Sierra Mágina Natural Park (S Spain). Geoderma 164, 54–63.Google Scholar
Barančíková, G, Senesi, N and Brunetti, G (1997) Chemical and spectroscopic characterization of humic acids isolated from different Slovak soil types. Geoderma 78, 251–266.Google Scholar
Barje, F, El Fels, L, El Hajjouji, H, Amir, S, Winterton, P and Hafidi, M (2012) Molecular behaviour of humic acid-like substances during co-composting of olive mill waste and the organic part of municipal solid waste. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 74, 17–23.Google Scholar
Benítez, E, Nogales, R, Masciandaro, G and Ceccanti, B (2000) Isolation by isoelectric focusing of humic-urease complexes from earthworm (Eisenia fetida)-processed sewage sludges. Biology and Fertility of Soils 31, 489–493.Google Scholar
Bernal, MP, Navarro, AF, Sánchez-Monedero, MA, Roig, A and Cegarra, J (1998) Influence of sewage sludge compost stability and maturity on carbon and nitrogen mineralization in soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 30, 305–313.Google Scholar
Bertoncini, EI, D'Orazio, V, Senesi, N and Mattiazzo, ME (2008) Effects of sewage sludge amendment on the properties of two Brazilian oxisols and their humic acids. Bioresource Technology 99, 4972–4979.Google Scholar
Birdwell, JE and Engel, AS (2010) Characterization of dissolved organic matter in cave and spring waters using UV–Vis absorbance and fluorescence spectroscopy. Organic Geochemistry 41, 270–280.Google Scholar
Brunetti, G, Plaza, C, Clapp, CE and Senesi, N (2007) Compositional and functional features of humic acids from organic amendments and amended soils in Minnesota, USA. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 39, 1355–1365.Google Scholar
Campitelli, PA, Velasco, MI and Ceppi, SB (2006) Chemical and physicochemical characteristics of humic acids extracted from compost, soil and amended soil. Talanta 69, 1234–1239.Google Scholar
Chai, X, Liu, G, Zhao, X, Hao, Y and Zhao, Y (2012) Fluorescence excitation–emission matrix combined with regional integration analysis to characterize the composition and transformation of humic and fulvic acids from landfill at different stabilization stages. Waste Management 32, 438–447.Google Scholar
Chen, Y, Senesi, N and Schnitzer, M (1977) Information provided on humic substances by E4/E6 ratios. Soil Science Society of America Journal 41, 352–358.Google Scholar
Chen, Y, Magen, H and Riov, J (1994) Humic substances originating from rapidly decomposing organic matter. Properties and effects on plant growth. In Senesi, N and Miano, TM (eds), Humic Substances in the Global Environment and Implications on Human Health: Proceedings of the 6th International Meeting of the International Humic Substances Society. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, pp. 427–443.Google Scholar
Chen, J, Gu, B, LeBoeuf, EJ, Pan, H and Dai, S (2002) Spectroscopic characterization of the structural and functional properties of natural organic matter fractions. Chemosphere 48, 59–68.Google Scholar
Chen, W, Westerhoff, P, Leenheer, JA and Booksh, K (2003) Fluorescence excitation − emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter. Environmental Science & Technology 37, 5701–5710.Google Scholar
Coble, PG (1996) Characterization of marine and terrestrial DOM in seawater using excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy. Marine Chemistry 51, 325–346.Google Scholar
Davis, WM, Erickson, CL, Johnston, CT, Delfino, JJ and Porter, JE (1999) Quantitative Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopic investigation humic substance functional group composition. Chemosphere 38, 2913–2928.Google Scholar
de Araújo, ASF, de Melo, WJ and Singh, RP (2010) Municipal solid waste compost amendment in agricultural soil: changes in soil microbial biomass. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology 9, 41–49.Google Scholar
Doskočil, L, Grasset, L, Enev, V, Kalina, L and Pekař, M (2015) Study of water-extractable fractions from South Moravian lignite. Environmental Earth Sciences 73, 3873–3885.Google Scholar
Doskočil, L, Enev, V, Grasset, L and Wasserbauer, J (2017) The characterization of South Moravian lignite in its natural and treated forms using thermal degradation methods. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 128, 83–91.Google Scholar
Doskočil, L, Burdíková-Szewieczková, J, Enev, V, Kalina, L and Wasserbauer, J (2018) Spectral characterization and comparison of Humic acids isolated from some European lignites. Fuel 213, 123–132.Google Scholar
dos Santos, LM, Simões, ML, de Melo, WJ, Martin-Neto, L and Pereira-Filho, ER (2010) Application of chemometric methods in the evaluation of chemical and spectroscopic data on organic matter from Oxisols in sewage sludge applications. Geoderma 155, 121–127.Google Scholar
Droussi, Z, D'orazio, V, Provenzano, MR, Hafidi, M and Ouatmane, A (2009) Study of the biodegradation and transformation of olive-mill residues during composting using FTIR spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry. Journal of Hazardous Materials 164, 1281–1285.Google Scholar
Duong, TTT, Penfold, C and Marschner, P (2012) Amending soils of different texture with six compost types: impact on soil nutrient availability, plant growth and nutrient uptake. Plant and Soil 354, 197–209.Google Scholar
Enev, V, Pospíšilová, Ľ, Klučáková, M, Liptaj, T and Doskočil, L (2014) Spectral characterization of selected humic substances. Soil & Water Research 9, 9–17.Google Scholar
FAO (2006). World Reference Base for Soil Resources. A Framework for International Classification, Correlation and Communication. World Soil Resources Reports 103. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
Fernandes, AN, Giovanela, M, Esteves, VI and de Souza Sierra, MM (2010) Elemental and spectral properties of peat and soil samples and their respective humic substances. Journal of Molecular Structure 971, 33–38.Google Scholar
Fuentes, M, González-Gaitano, G and García-Mina, JM (2006) The usefulness of UV–visible and fluorescence spectroscopies to study the chemical nature of humic substances from soils and composts. Organic Geochemistry 37, 1949–1959.Google Scholar
García, C and Hernández, T (1997) Biological and biochemical indicators in derelict soils subject to erosion. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 29, 171–177.Google Scholar
García-Gil, JC, Plaza, C, Senesi, N, Brunetti, G and Polo, A (2004 a) Effects of sewage sludge amendment on humic acids and microbiological properties of a semiarid Mediterranean soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils 39, 320–328.Google Scholar
García-Gil, JC, Ceppi, SB, Velasco, MI, Polo, A and Senesi, N (2004 b) Long-term effects of amendment with municipal solid waste compost on the elemental and acidic functional group composition and pH-buffer capacity of soil humic acids. Geoderma 121, 135–142.Google Scholar
García-Gil, JC, Plaza, C, Fernández, JM, Senesi, N and Polo, A (2008) Soil fulvic acid characteristics and proton binding behavior as affected by long-term municipal waste compost amendment under semi-arid environment. Geoderma 146, 363–369.Google Scholar
Giusquiani, PL, Pagliai, M, Gigliotti, G, Businelli, D and Benetti, A (1995) Urban waste compost: effects on physical, chemical, and biochemical soil properties. Journal of Environmental Quality 24, 175–182.Google Scholar
González-Vila, FJ, Almendros, G, del Rio, JC, Martín, F, Gutiérrez, A and Romero, J (1999) Ease of delignification assessment of wood from different Eucalyptus species by pyrolysis (TMAH)-GC/MS and CP/MAS 13C-NMR spectrometry. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 49, 295–305.Google Scholar
Hay, MB and Myneni, SCB (2007) Structural environments of carboxyl groups in natural organic molecules from terrestrial systems. Part 1: infrared spectroscopy. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 71, 3518–3532.Google Scholar
He, X, Xi, B, Wei, Z, Guo, X, Li, M, An, D and Liu, H (2011) Spectroscopic characterization of water extractable organic matter during composting of municipal solid waste. Chemosphere 82, 541–548.Google Scholar
Henderson, RK, Baker, A, Murphy, KR, Hambly, A, Stuetz, RM and Khan, SJ (2009) Fluorescence as a potential monitoring tool for recycled water systems: a review. Water Research 43, 863–881.Google Scholar
Horwath, WR, Elliott, LF and Churchill, DB (1995) Mechanisms regulating composting of high carbon to nitrogen ratio grass straw. Compost Science & Utilization 3, 22–30.Google Scholar
Hudson, N, Baker, A, Ward, D, Reynolds, DM, Brunsdon, C, Carliell-Marquet, C and Browning, S (2008) Can fluorescence spectrometry be used as a surrogate for the Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) test in water quality assessment? An example from South West England. Science of the Total Environment 391, 149–158.Google Scholar
Kalbitz, K, Geyer, S and Geyer, W (2000) A comparative characterization of dissolved organic matter by means of original aqueous samples and isolated humic substances. Chemosphere 40, 1305–1312.Google Scholar
Korshin, GV, Li, C-W and Benjamin, MM (1997) Monitoring the properties of natural organic matter through UV spectroscopy: a consistent theory. Water Research 31, 1787–1795.Google Scholar
Kumada, K (1987) Classification of humic acids based on shape of the absorption spectrum and Δ log K. In Kumada, K (ed.) Chemistry of Soil Organic Matter. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, pp. 25–26.Google Scholar
Lakowicz, JR (2006) Instrumentation for fluorescence spectroscopy. In Lakowicz, JR (ed.) Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy. Boston, MA, USA: Springer, pp. 27–61.Google Scholar
Leifeld, J, Siebert, S and Kögel-Knabner, I (2002) Changes in the chemical composition of soil organic matter after application of compost. European Journal of Soil Science 53, 299–309.Google Scholar
Marhuenda-Egea, FC, Martínez-Sabater, E, Jordá, J, Moral, R, Bustamante, MA, Paredes, C and Pérez-Murcia, MD (2007) Dissolved organic matter fractions formed during composting of winery and distillery residues: evaluation of the process by fluorescence excitation–emission matrix. Chemosphere 68, 301–309.Google Scholar
McKnight, DM, Boyer, EW, Westerhoff, PK, Doran, PT, Kulbe, T and Andersen, DT (2001) Spectrofluorometric characterization of dissolved organic matter for indication of precursor organic material and aromaticity. Limnology and Oceanography 46, 38–48.Google Scholar
Milori, DMBP, Martin-Neto, L, Bayer, C, Mielniczuk, J and Bagnato, VS (2002) Humification degree of soil humic acids determined by fluorescence spectroscopy. Soil Science 167, 739–749.Google Scholar
Montoneri, E, Savarino, P, Adani, F, Genevini, PL, Ricca, G, Zanetti, F and Paoletti, S (2003) Polyalkylphenyl-sulphonic acid with acid groups of variable strength from compost. Waste Management 23, 523–535.Google Scholar
Morán Vieyra, FE, Palazzi, VI, Sanchez de Pinto, MI and Borsarelli, CD (2009) Combined UV–Vis absorbance and fluorescence properties of extracted humic substances-like for characterization of composting evolution of domestic solid wastes. Geoderma 151, 61–67.Google Scholar
Olsen, DJR, Endelman, JB, Jacobson, AR and Reeve, JR (2015) Compost carryover: nitrogen, phosphorus and FT-IR analysis of soil organic matter. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 101, 317–331.Google Scholar
Ouédraogo, E, Mando, A and Zombré, NP (2001) Use of compost to improve soil properties and crop productivity under low input agricultural system in West Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystems, & Environment 84, 259–266.Google Scholar
Pallasser, R, Minasny, B and McBratney, AB (2013) Soil carbon determination by thermogravimetrics. PeerJ 1, article no. e6.Google Scholar
Parlanti, E, Wörz, K, Geoffroy, L and Lamotte, M (2000) Dissolved organic matter fluorescence spectroscopy as a tool to estimate biological activity in a coastal zone submitted to anthropogenic inputs. Organic Geochemistry 31, 1765–1781.Google Scholar
Pedra, F, Plaza, C, Fernández, JM, García-Gil, JC and Polo, A (2008) Effects of municipal solid waste compost and sewage sludge on chemical and spectroscopic properties of humic acids from a sandy Haplic Podzol and a clay loam Calcic Vertisol in Portugal. Waste Management 28, 2183–2191.Google Scholar
Peiris, RH, Budman, H, Moresoli, C and Legge, RL (2011) Identification of humic acid-like and fulvic acid-like natural organic matter in river water using fluorescence spectroscopy. Water Science & Technology 63, 2427–2433.Google Scholar
Peuravuori, J and Pihlaja, K (1997) Molecular size distribution and spectroscopic properties of aquatic humic substances. Analytica Chimica Acta 337, 133–149.Google Scholar
Piccolo, A and Mbagwu, JSC (1994) Humic substances and surfactants effects on the stability of two tropical soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 58, 950–955.Google Scholar
Plaza, C, Senesi, N, Polo, A, Brunetti, G, García-Gil, JC and D'Orazio, V (2003) Soil fulvic acid properties as a means to assess the use of pig slurry amendment. Soil and Tillage Research 74, 179–190.Google Scholar
Rivero, C, Chirenje, T, Ma, LQ and Martinez, G (2004) Influence of compost on soil organic matter quality under tropical conditions. Geoderma 123, 355–361.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, FJ, Schlenger, P and García-Valverde, M (2014) A comprehensive structural evaluation of humic substances using several fluorescence techniques before and after ozonation. Part I: structural characterization of humic substances. Science of the Total Environment 476–477, 718–730.Google Scholar
Romero, E, Plaza, C, Senesi, N, Nogales, R and Polo, A (2007) Humic acid-like fractions in raw and vermicomposted winery and distillery wastes. Geoderma 139, 397–406.Google Scholar
Schulten, H-R and Schnitzer, M (1997) The chemistry of soil organic nitrogen: a review. Biology and Fertility of Soils 26, 1–15.Google Scholar
Senesi, N (1992) Binding mechanisms of pesticides to soil humic substances. Science of the Total Environment 123–124, 63–76.Google Scholar
Senesi, N, Miano, TM, Provenzano, MR and Brunetti, G (1991) Characterization, differentiation, and classification of humic substances by fluorescence spectroscopy. Soil Science 152, 259–271.Google Scholar
Senesi, N, Plaza, C, Brunetti, G and Polo, A (2007) A comparative survey of recent results on humic-like fractions in organic amendments and effects on native soil humic substances. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 39, 1244–1262.Google Scholar
Serramiá, N, Sánchez-Monedero, MA, Roig, A, Contin, M and De Nobili, M (2013) Changes in soil humic pools after soil application of two-phase olive mill waste compost. Geoderma 192, 21–30.Google Scholar
Sierra, MMD, Giovanela, M, Parlanti, E and Soriano-Sierra, EJ (2005) Fluorescence fingerprint of fulvic and humic acids from varied origins as viewed by single-scan and excitation/emission matrix techniques. Chemosphere 58, 715–733.Google Scholar
Swift, RS (1996) Organic matter characterization. In Sparks, DL, Page, AL, Helmke, PA and Loeppert, RH (eds). Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3 Chemical Methods. Madison: Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy. pp. 1011–1069.Google Scholar
Swift, RS, Rate, AW and McLaren, RG (1995) Interactions of copper with soil humic substances. In Huang, PM, Berthelin, J, Bollag, J-M, McGill, WB and Page, AL (eds), Environmental Impact of Soil Component Interactions vol. II: Metals, Other Inorganics and Microbial Activities. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers, pp. 19–28.Google Scholar
Traversa, A, D'Orazio, V, Mezzapesa, GN, Bonifacio, E, Farrag, K, Senesi, N and Brunetti, G (2014) Chemical and spectroscopic characteristics of humic acids and dissolved organic matter along two Alfisol profiles. Chemosphere 111, 184–194.Google Scholar
Uyguner, CS and Bekbolet, M (2005) Implementation of spectroscopic parameters for practical monitoring of natural organic matter. Desalination 176, 47–55.Google Scholar
Valencia, S, Marín, JM, Restrepo, G and Frimmel, FH (2013) Application of excitation–emission fluorescence matrices and UV/Vis absorption to monitoring the photocatalytic degradation of commercial humic acid. Science of the Total Environment 442, 207–214.Google Scholar
Vergnoux, A, Guiliano, M, Di Rocco, R, Domeizel, M, Théraulaz, F and Doumenq, P (2011) Quantitative and mid-infrared changes of humic substances from burned soils. Environmental Research 111, 205–214.Google Scholar
Wan, S, Xi, B, Xia, X, Li, M, Iv, D, Wang, L and Song, C (2012) Using fluorescence excitation–emission matrix spectroscopy to monitor the conversion of organic matter during anaerobic co-digestion of cattle dung and duck manure. Bioresource Technology 123, 439–444.Google Scholar
Yu, H, Song, Y, Tu, X, Du, E, Liu, R and Peng, J (2013) Assessing removal efficiency of dissolved organic matter in wastewater treatment using fluorescence excitation emission matrices with parallel factor analysis and second derivative synchronous fluorescence. Bioresource Technology 144, 595–601.Google Scholar