Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T14:45:56.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Losses in the conservation of grassland herbage in lined trench silos:II. Comparison of lacerated silages of low and high dry-matter content made by the cold fermentation process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

W. O. Brown  and
J. A. M. Kerr
W. O. Brown
Affiliation:
Agricultural Chemistry Department, Queen's University, Belfast, and Ministry of Agriculture, Northern Ireland
J. A. M. Kerr
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute, Hillsborough
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A conservation experiment is described in which a comparison is made of quality and of nutrient losses in wilted and unwilted lacerated silages made by the cold fermentation process in large trench silos. The losses of dry matter in the two wilted silages were 19.7 and 16.7% and in the unwilted silages 23.3 and 22.1%.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 64 , Issue 1 , February 1965 , pp. 143 - 149
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allred, K. R. & Kennedy, W. K. (1956). Agron. J. 48, 308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelsson, J. (1952). Proc. 6th Int. Grassl. Congr. 1153.Google Scholar
Brown, W. O. (1962). Res. Exp. Rec. Min. Agric. N.I. 11, 125.Google Scholar
Brown, W. O. & Kerr, J. A. M. (1965). J. Agric. Sci. 64, 135.Google Scholar
Brown, W. O. & Smyth, V. (1958). J. Agric. Sci. 50, 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crasemann, E. & Heinzl, O. (1949a). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 4, 263.Google Scholar
Crasemann, E. & Heinzl, O. (1949b). Proc. 5th Int. Grassl. Congr. p. 295.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, N. D. (1952). Maandbl. Landb. Voere, 9, 142.Google Scholar
Fleischmann, F. (1912). Landw. Vers. Sta. 76, 237.Google Scholar
Gordon, C. H., Derbyshire, J. C., Wiseman, H. G., Kane, E. A. & Melin, C. G. (1961). J. Dairy Sci. 44, 1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, R. J. & Mcnaughtox, M. (1961). N.Z. J. Agnc. Res. 4, 504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. & Buysee, F. (1953). Meded. Landb- Hogesch. Gent, 18, 565.Google Scholar
Mcdonaid, P., Sterling, A. C., Henderson, A. R. & Whittenbury, R. (1962). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 11, 581.Google Scholar
Murdoch, J. C. (1953). Rep. Nat. Inst. Res. in, Dairying, p. 36.Google Scholar
Murdoch, J. C., Balch, D. A., Foot, A. S. & Rowland, S. J. (1955). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 10, 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, M. J. (1959a). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 14, 107.Google Scholar
NASH, M. J. (1959b). . Brit. Grassl. Soc. 14, 177.Google Scholar
Oades, J. M., Brown, W. O. & Kerb, J. A. M. (1964). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 19, 38.Google Scholar
Watson, S. J. & Nash, M. J. (1960). The Conservation of Grass and Forage Crops, 2nd ed.Edinburgh and London: Oliver and Boyd, Ltd.Google Scholar
Woodward, T. E. & Shepherd, J. B. (1938). U.S. Dept Agr. Tech. Bull. 611.Google Scholar
Wittwer, L. S., Kennedy, W. K., Trimberqer, G. W.. & Turk, K. L. (1958). Cornell Univ. Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. no. 931.Google Scholar