Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-22T10:03:59.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Investigations into the chemical composition and nutritive value of certain forage plants at medium altitudes in the tropics III. The digestibility and nutritive value of grass and legume hays and ‘standing hays’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. R. Todd
J. R. Todd
Affiliation:
East African Veterinary Research Organization
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The results are presented of two series of digestibility trials. The first series consists of six grass hays, cut at different stages of growth, and two legume hays cut at the flowering stage. The second series consists of trials using seven species of grasses at the ‘standing hay’ stage.

2. Good-quality grass hays are obtained from grasses at the flowering stage. More mature grasses yield poor- or very poor-quality hays of low-protein content.

3. The legume hays were of good quality, being particularly high in digestible protein.

4. The grasses at the ‘standing hay’ stage are generally of poor feeding value, Brachiaria brizantha, a drought-resistant species, being the best of the seven studied.

5. From these results a tentative conclusion is drawn that, during the dry season, the extensive grazing areas of East Africa are capable of providing, at the most, for the maintenance requirements of ruminants.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , April 1956 , pp. 225 - 231
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Edwards, D. C. & Bogdan, A. V. (1951). Important Grassland Plants of Kenya, p. 26. London: Pitman and Sons.Google Scholar
French, M. H. (1943). E. Afric. Agric. J. 8, 126.Google Scholar
Morrison, F. B. (1936). Feeds and Feeding, 20th ed.Ithaca, New York: Morrison Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Rutledge, W. A. & Common, R. H. (1947). J. Agric. Sci. 38, 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senior, B. T. & Sheehy, E. J. (1939). J. Dep. Agric. Eire, 36, 5.Google Scholar
Todd, J. R. (1956 a). J. Agric. Sci. (in the Press).Google Scholar
Todd, J. R. (1956 b). J. Agric. Sci. (in the Press).Google Scholar
Watson, S. J. & Horton, E. A. (1936). J. Agric. Sci. 26, 142.Google Scholar
Woodman, H. E. (1942). The composition and nutritive value of feeding stuffs. Bull. Minist. Agric, Lond., no. 124. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar