Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:08:35.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of row spacing on growth, light and water use by sorghum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. McGowan
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leicestershire, UK
H. M. Taylor
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA
J. Willingham
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA

Summary

Grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) was grown in Texas in 1985 at a constant population density of c. 6·6 plants/m2 in rows 0·5, 1·0 and 1·5 m apart and with the soil profile at field capacity at planting time. Dry matter production and yield were least at the widest spacing, principally because of a reduction in number of tillers. Dry matter accumulation was in direct proportion to the amount of light intercepted and largely independent of spacing between rows, with a conversion coefficient of 1·71 g dry matter/MJ energy intercepted. The most widely spaced crop used less water but not in proportion to the extent that ground cover was reduced. Water use efficiency was also less in the most widely spaced crop, probably because of heat advection from the bare soil between rows.

Type
Crops and Soils
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bennie, A. T. P., Taylor, H. M. & Georgen, P. G. (1987). An assessment of the core-break method for estimating rooting density of different crops in the field. Soil Tillage Research 9, 347353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackstock, D. A. (1979). Soil Survey of Lubbock County, Texas. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Blum, A. & Naveh, M. (1976). Improved water-use efficiency in dry land grown sorghum by promoted plant competition. Agronomy Journal 68, 111116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. L. & Shrader, W. D. (1959). Grain yield, evapotranspiration and water use efficiency of grain sorghum under different cultural practices. Agronomy Journal 51, 339343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chin Choy, E. W. & Kanemasu, E. T. (1974). Energy balance comparisons of wide and narrow row spacings in sorghum. Agronomy Journal 66, 98100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dry Land Farming Research Scheme, (1981). Botswana Phase III. Second Annual Report December 1981. Agricultural Research Service, Sebele, Botswana.Google Scholar
Gallagher, J. N. & Biscoe, P. V. (1978). Radiation adsorption, growth and yield of cereals. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 4760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, C. F. & Deuchar, C. N. (1985). On improved tube solarimeter construction. Journal of Experimental Botany 36, 690693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanks, R. J., Allen, L. H. & Gardner, H. R. (1971). Advection and evapotranspiration of wide-row sorghum in the central Great Plains. Agronomy Journal 63, 520527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, B. & Willey, R. W. (1983). Radiation interception and growth in an inter crop of pearl millet/groundnut. Field Crops Research 7, 141160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muchow, R. C. & Coates, D. B. (1986). An analysis of the environmental limitations to yield of irrigated grain sorghum during the dry season in tropical Australia using a radiation interception model. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 37, 135148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muchow, R. C. & Davies, R. (1988). Effects of nitrogen supply on the comparative productivity of maize and sorghum in a semi-arid tropical environment. II. Radiation interception and biomass accumulation. Field Crops Research 18, 1743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, R. J. K. & Foale, M. A. (1980). Row spacing and population density in Australian grain sorghum production. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 46, 214220.Google Scholar
Myers, R. J. K. & Foale, M. A. (1981). Row spacing and population density in grain sorghum – a simple analysis. Field Crops Research 4, 147154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nageswara Rao, R. C., Simmonds, L. P., Azam-Ali, S. N. & Williams, J. H. (1989). Population, growth and water use of groundnut maintained on stored water. I: root and shoot growth. Experimental Agriculture 25, 5161.Google Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1948). Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series A, 193, 120146.Google Scholar
Porter, K. B., Jensen, M. E. & Stetten, W. H. (1960). The effect of row spacing, fertilizer and planting rate on the yield and water use of irregular grown sorghum. Agronomy Journal 52, 431434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, J. T. (1983). Efficient water use in crop production: discussion on the generality of relations between biomass production and evapotranspiration. In Limitations to Efficient Water Use in Crop Production (Eds Taylor, H. M., Jordan, W. R. & Sinclair, T. R.) pp. 2944. Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Simmonds, L. P. & Azam-Ali, S. N. (1989). Population, growth and water use of groundnut maintained on stored water. IV: The influence of population on water supply and demand. Experimental Agriculture 25, 8798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivakumar, M. V. K. & Huda, A. K. S (1985). Solar energy utilisation by tropical sorghums. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 35, 4757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivakumar, M. V. K. & Virmani, S. M. (1980). Growth and resource use of maize, pigeon pea and maize/pigeon winter crop in an operational research watershed. Experimental Agriculture 16, 377386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, J. L. (1986). Dryland grain sorghum water use, light interception and growth responses to planting geometry. Agronomy Journal 78, 720726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tennant, D. (1975). A test of a modified line intercept method of estimating root length. Journal of Ecology 63, 9951001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, A. Y. M. & Shaw, R. H. (1964). Effect of plant population and planting pattern of corn on water-use and yield. Agronomy Journal 56, 147152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar