Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:30:32.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of herbage mass and supplementary feeding on nutrient flows and animal performance in grazing, lactating ewes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2012

H. DOVE ,
J. A. MILNE ,
C. S. LAMB ,
A. M. SIBBALD  and
H. A. McCORMACK
H. DOVE*
Affiliation:
CSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
J. A. MILNE
Affiliation:
Macaulay Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8HQ, Scotland
C. S. LAMB
Affiliation:
Macaulay Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8HQ, Scotland
A. M. SIBBALD
Affiliation:
Macaulay Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8HQ, Scotland
H. A. McCORMACK
Affiliation:
Macaulay Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8HQ, Scotland
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The present paper examines the effect of the type of supplement given to grazing ewes in early lactation on the performance of ewes and lambs on temperate sown pastures. Lactating ewes grazed perennial ryegrass pastures at either low- or high-herbage masses, between days 8 and 96 of lactation. On the low-herbage mass treatments, ewes were either unsupplemented or received either an energy supplement (sugarbeet pulp) or a protein supplement (1:1 sugarbeet pulp:formaldehyde-treated soyabean meal) between days 8 and 50 of lactation. The provision of supplements or the higher herbage mass led to increases in live weight (LW) and body condition score of ewes during days 8–50 of lactation, while unsupplemented ewes on the low-herbage mass treatment lost LW and had lower body condition scores. After supplementation finished, previously supplemented ewes or those grazing the higher herbage mass lost LW and condition, while unsupplemented ewes grazing the low-herbage mass gained both LW and condition. Non-treatment factors such as ewe dentition score significantly affected ewe and lamb LW gains. Regression analyses indicated that lamb LW gains between days 8 and 50 of lactation were 40–60 g/d greater in lambs from supplemented ewes or ewes grazing the higher herbage mass cf. unsupplemented ewes. Overall, there was no difference in the response of ewes or lambs to the type of supplement. Milk yields were estimated in a subset of ewes (replicate 4). Ewes on the high-herbage mass treatment or those supplemented with protein had higher milk yields than those on the low-herbage mass treatment or those given the energy supplement. Supplemented ewes in this replicate had higher metabolizable energy intakes (MEIs). Measurements of digesta flow in a further subset of ewes indicated that both supplements resulted in greater ruminal and post-ruminal supplies of energy and protein than in the unsupplemented ewes at the lower herbage mass, but differences in ruminal and post-ruminal nutrient provision between the supplements were less than had been intended. It is suggested that this is the reason for there being no statistical difference in the performance of ewes and lambs in response to the type of supplement.

Type
Animal Research Papers
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 150 , Issue 5 , October 2012 , pp. 644 - 662
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

AOAC (1970). Official Methods of Analysis, 11th edn. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.Google Scholar
Binnerts, W. T., Van't Klooster, A. T. & Frens, A. M. (1968). Soluble chromium indicator measured by atomic absorption in digestion experiments. Veterinary Record 82, 470.Google Scholar
Cruickshank, G. J., Poppi, D. P. & Sykes, A. R. (1992). The intake, digestion and protein degradation of grazed herbage by early-weaned lambs. British Journal of Nutrition 68, 349–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CSIRO (2007). Nutrient Requirements of Domesticated Ruminants. Collingwood, Australia: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
Dove, H. (1988). Estimation of the intake of milk by lambs, from the turnover of deuterium- or tritium-labelled water. British Journal of Nutrition 60, 375–387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dove, H. (2002). Principles of supplementary feeding. In Sheep Nutrition (Eds Freer, M. & Dove, H.), pp. 119–142. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dove, H. & Freer, M. (1979). Accuracy of tritiated water turnover rate as an estimate of milk intake in lambs. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 30, 725–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dove, H., Freer, M., Axelsen, A. & Downes, R. W. (1984 a). Supplementary feeding of ewes in prime lamb production systems. Animal Production in Australia 15, 329–332.Google Scholar
Dove, H., Freer, M., Egan, A. R. & Doyle, P. T. (1984 b). Simultaneous measurement of pasture and supplement intake in grazing, lactating ewes. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society of Australia 9, 166.Google Scholar
Dove, H., Freer, M. & Foot, J. Z. (2000). The nutrition of grazing ewes during pregnancy and lactation: a comparison of alkane-based and chromium/in vitro-based estimates of herbage intake. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51, 765–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dove, H. & McCormack, H. A. (1986). Estimation of the rumen degradation of forage rape after incubation in nylon bags in the rumen of sheep. Grass and Forage Science 41, 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dove, H. & Milne, J. A. (1991). An evaluation of the effects of incisor dentition and age on the performance of lactating ewes and their lambs. Animal Production 53, 183–190.Google Scholar
Dove, H. & Milne, J. A. (1994). Digesta flow and rumen microbial protein production in ewes grazing perennial ryegrass. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 45, 1229–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dove, H., Milne, J. A. & Mayes, R. W. (1990). Comparison of herbage intakes estimated from in vitro or alkane-based digestibilities. Proceedings of the NZ Society of Animal Production 50, 457–459.Google Scholar
Dove, H., Milne, J. A., Sibbald, A. M., Lamb, C. S. & McCormack, H. A. (1988). Circadian variation in abomasal digesta flow in grazing ewes during lactation. British Journal of Nutrition 60, 653–668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freer, M. & Dove, H. (1984). Rumen degradation of protein in sunflower meal, rapeseed meal and lupin seed placed in nylon bags. Animal Feed Science and Technology 11, 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freer, M., Moore, A. D. & Donnelly, J. R. (1997). GRAZPLAN: decision support systems for Australian grazing enterprises. II. The animal biology model for feed intake, production and reproduction and the GrazFeed DSS. Agricultural Systems 54, 77–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, A., Thomas, V. M., Ansotegui, R., Burfening, P. J. & Kott, R. W. (1991). Influence of escape protein supplementation to grazing ewes suckling twins on milk production and lamb performance. Small Ruminant Research 4, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoon, J. H., Herselman, M. J., van Heerden, M. & Pretorius, A. P. (2000). The effect of bypass protein supplementation on the reproductive performance of Merino sheep grazing mixed karoo veld. South African Journal of Animal Science 30 (Supplement 1), 60–61.Google Scholar
Loerch, S. C., McClure, K. E. & Parker, C. F. (1985). Effects of number of lambs suckled and supplemental protein source on lactating ewe performance. Journal of Animal Science 60, 7–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madibela, O. R., Gibbs, S. J., Sykes, A. R., Laporte-Uribe, J. & Zhao, J. (2009). Amino acid flow at the abomasum in twin-suckling ewes at pasture and the effect of a fishmeal supplement. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 69, 233–237.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission (1981). Feeding the Ewe, 2nd edn. Milton Keynes, UK: Meat and Livestock Commission.Google Scholar
Mikolayunas, C. M., Thomas, D. L., Albrecht, K. A., Combs, D. K., Berger, Y. M. & Eckerman, S. R. (2008). Effects of supplementation and stage of lactation on performance of grazing dairy ewes. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 1477–1485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milne, J. A., Maxwell, T. J. & Souter, W. (1981). Effect of supplementary feeding and herbage mass on the intake and performance of grazing ewes in early lactation. Animal Production 32, 185–195.Google Scholar
Molle, G., Ligios, S., Fois, N., Decandia, M., Casu, S. & Bomboi, G. (1997). Responses by dairy ewes to different sward heights under continuous stocking either unsupplemented or supplemented with corn grain. In Recent Advances in Small Ruminant Research: Proceedings of the seminar of the FAO-CIHEAM Network of Cooperative Research on Sheep and Goats, Subnetwork on Nutrition, jointly organized with the Institut agnomique et vétérinaire Hassan II, Rabat, Morocco, 24–26 October 1996 (Eds Lindberg, J. E., Gonda, H. L. & Ledin, I.), pp. 65–70. Paris, France: CIHEAM.Google Scholar
Morris, S. T. & Kenyon, P. R. (2004). The effect of litter size and sward height on ewe and lamb performance. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 47, 275–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penning, P. D., Orr, R. J. & Treacher, T. T. (1988). Responses of lactating ewes, offered fresh herbage indoors and when grazing, to supplements containing differing protein concentrations. Animal Production 46, 403–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. J. (1990). Nutrition over the winter period – the breeding female. In New Developments in Sheep Production (Eds Slade, C. F. R. & Lawrence, T. L. J.), pp. 55–69. Occasional Publication No. 14. Edinburgh, UK: British Society of Animal Production.Google Scholar
Sykes, A. R., Field, A. C. & Gunn, R. G. (1974). Effects of age and state of incisor dentition on body composition and lamb production of sheep grazing hill pastures. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 83, 135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, T. N., Weston, R. H. & Hogan, J. P. (1971). Use of 103Ru-labelled tris (1,10 phenanthroline) Ruthenium (11) chloride as a marker in digestion studies with sheep. International Journal of Applied Radiation and Isotopes 22, 301–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treacher, T. T. & Caja, G. (2002). Nutrition during lactation. In Sheep Nutrition (Eds Freer, M. & Dove, H.), pp. 213–236. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vipond, J. E. (1979). Effect of clipping and diet on intake and performance of housed pregnant and lactating ewes. Animal Production 28, 451–452.Google Scholar