Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:02:59.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of caecectomy on digestibility of amino acids by roosters fed distillers' dried grains with solubles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

C. M. Parsons
C. M. Parsons
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, 322 Mumford Hall, 1301 West Gregory Drive, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801 U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Several laboratories are currently using the rapid excreta collection assay desoribed by Sibbald (1979), or a modification thereof, to measure digestibility of amino acids (AA) in feedingstuffs for poultry. The use of faecal or excreta collection assays to measure utilization of dietary AA has been frequently questioned because of the unknown effects of gut micro-organisms on AA excretion. These effects may be large with swine (Holmes et al. 1974) and thus many researchers have used ileal digesta collection to measure AA digestibility with pigs (Zebrowska, 1978). The question on significance of microbial effects is less clear with poultry. Some studies with germ-free chicks suggested that influence of the hindgut microflora on digestibility of protein and AA was significant (Salter & Coates, 1971; Elwell & Soares, 1975), whereas others indicated that these effects were small and probably negligible (Salter, Coates & Hewitt, 1974; Salter & Fulford, 1974). More recently, Parsons, Potter, Brown, Wilkins & Bliss (1982) concluded that microbial fermentation in the hindgut may have a significant effect on AA excretion by poultry, but to a much lesser extent than swine.

Type
Short Notes
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 104 , Issue 2 , April 1985 , pp. 469 - 472
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Elwell, D. & Soares, J. H. (1975). Amino acid bio-availability: a comparative evaluation of several assay techniques. Poultry Science 54, 78–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. H. G., Bayley, H. S., Leadbeater, P. A. & Horney, F. D. (1974). Digestion of protein in small and large intestine of the pig. British Journal of Nutrition 32, 479–489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kessler, J. W., Nguyen, T. H. & Thomas, O. P. (1981). The amino acid excretion values in intact and caecectomized negative control roosters used for determining metabolic plus endogenous urinary losses. Poultry Science 60, 1576–1577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, J. W. & Thomas, O. P. (1981). The effect of caecectomy and extension of the collection period on the true metabolizable energy values of soybean meal, feather meal, fish meal and blood meal. Poultry Science 60, 2639–2647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, C. M. (1984). Influence of caecectomy and source of dietary fibre or starch on excretion of endogenous amino acids by laying hens. British Journal of Nutrition 51, 541–548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parsons, C. M., Baker, D. H. & Harter, J. M. (1983). Distillers dried grains with solubles as a protein source for the chick. Poultry Science 62, 2445–2451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, C. M., Potter, L. M. & Bliss, B. A. (1982). True metabolizable energy corrected to nitrogen equilibrium. Poultry Science 61, 2241–2246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, C. M., Potter, L. M. & Brown, R. D. Jr. (1983). Effects of dietary carbohydrate and of intestinal microflora on excretion of endogenous amino acids by poultry. Poultry Science 62, 483–489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parsons, C. M., Potter, L. M., Brown, R. D. Jr, Wilkins, T. D. & Bliss, B. A. (1982). Microbial contribution to dry matter and amino acid content of poultry excreta. Poultry Science 61, 925–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, W. L., Kifer, R. R., Snyder, D. G. & Coombs, G. F. (1971). Studies of protein digestion in the chicken. 1. Investigation of apparent amino acid digestibility of fish meal protein using caecectomized adult male chickens. Poultry Science 50, 143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, D. N. & Coates, M. E. (1971). The influence of the microflora of the alimentary tract on protein digestion in the chick. British Journal of Nutrition 26, 55–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salter, D. N., Coates, M. E. & Hewitt, D. (1974). The utilization of protein and excretion of uric acid in germ-free and conventional chicks. British Journal of Nutrition 31, 307–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salter, D. N. & Fulford, R. J. (1974). The influence of the gut microflora on the digestion of dietary and endogenous proteins: studies of the amino acid composition of the excreta of germ-free and conventional chicks. British Journal of Nutrition 32, 625–637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sibbald, I. R. (1979). A bioassay for available amino acids and true metabolizable energy in feedingstuffs. Poultry Science 58, 668–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibbald, I. R. (1983). The T.M.E. system of feed evaluation. Contribution 83–1, pp. 16–21. Ottawa, Canada: Animal Research Centre.Google Scholar
Zebrowska, T. (1978). Determination of available amino acids in feedstuffs for monogastrics. Feedstuffs 50, 15–17, 43–44.Google Scholar