Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T01:03:08.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The induction of pregnancy in the anoestrous ewe by hormonal therapy V. Progesterone-pregnant mare's serum therapy on Clun forest maiden sheep and general conclusions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

I. Gordon
I. Gordon
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This trial concerns the induction of pregnancy in two flocks of Clun maiden yearling ewes and involves seventy-six animals. Previous observations suggested that treatment of this particular category usually gives rise to a higher conception percentage than is found with dry post-partum or lactating sheep. The trial sought to elucidate some factors of animal and environment which may be associated with this response.

In flock 45, during the period 10 February to 29 March, observations were made on the incidence of spontaneous breeding activity in forty-seven ewes; hormonal therapy was first applied at the latter date. Treatment for all ewes consisted of three doses of 50 mg. progesterone (in oil) given at 3-day intervals; a single dose of 750 i.u. p.m.s. was administered 2 days after final progesterone.

Nineteen of the forty-seven ewes (40%) in flock 45 showed spontaneous oestrus in February or March. Three (16%) of those ewes previously mated came in oestrus after treatment; forty-nine of the fiftyseven unmated ewes (86%) showed oestrus 3–5 days after the end of injection. Of the nineteen sheep that mated spontaneously, ten (53%) produced autumn lambs. Twenty-six of the fifty-two sheep (50%) served in response to the progesterone-p.m.s. therapy conceived. 1·25 lambs were born per ewe that lambed. Some evidence for total embryonic or foetal loss in the ewes during pregnancy was obtained. Results indicate that conception in these maiden ewes may have been facilitated by the presence of corpora lutea or recent luteal activity, which maintained the oestrogen-progesterone balance necessary for providing an adequate uterine environment. For this reason, maiden ewes of breeds with short breeding seasons (e.g. Scotch Half-Breds) may not give such satisfactory response when injected at times comparable to long season breeds, such as the Clun.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 60 , Issue 1 , February 1963 , pp. 77 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahmed, S. I. (1955). J. Agric. Sci. 46, 168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, D. M. & Lamming, G. E. (1960). J. Reprod. Fertil. 1, 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anon. (1950). Ann. Rep. M. M. B. Prod. Div. no. 1, 31.Google Scholar
Averill, R. L. W. (1958). J. Agric. Sci. 50, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Averill, R. L. W. & Rowson, L. E. (1958). J. Endocrinol. 16, 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, S., Folley, S. J., Rowlands, S. J., Curnow, D. H. & Simpson, S. A. (1948). Nature, Lond., 162, 845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickhoff, E. M., Booth, A. N., Lyman, R. L., Livingston, A. L., Thompson, C. R. & De Eds, F. (1957). Science, 120, 969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, S. (1959). Gynaecologia, 148, 157.Google Scholar
Braden, A. W. H., Lamond, D. R. & Radford, H. M. (1960). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 11, 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brambell, F. W. R. & Rowlands, I. W. (1936). Phil. Trans. B, 226, 71.Google Scholar
Brook, H. & Rowson, L. E. (1952). J. Agric. Sci. 42, 479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, S. & Westman, A. (1958). Acta Endocrin. 28, 39.Google Scholar
Bunding, I., Schooley, M. A., Bock, F. C. & Steelman, S. L. (1953). J. Anim. Sci. 12, 943.Google Scholar
Chang, M. C. (1955). Nature, Lond., 175, 1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, H. H., Hart, G. H. & Miller, R. F. (1945). Endocrinology, 36, 370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, H. H. & Miller, R. F. (1933). Amer. J. Physiol. 104, 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Combs, W., Botkin, M. P. & Nelms, G. E. (1961). J. Anim. Sci. 20, 968 (Abs.).Google Scholar
Coop, I. E. & Clarke, V. R. (1958). N.Z. J. Agric. Res. 1, 365.Google Scholar
Courrier, R. (1950). Vitam. & Horm. 8, 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauzier, L., Ortavant, R., Thibault, C. & Wintenberger, S. (1954). Ann. Zootech., Paris, 3, 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauzier, L., Thibault, C. & Wintenberger, S. (1953). Ann. Endocrin., Paris, 14, 533.Google Scholar
Dauzier, L. & Wintenberger, S. (1952). Ann. d'l'I.N.R.A. p. 49.Google Scholar
Davies, H. L. (1960). Aust. Vet. J. 36, 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, H. L. & Dun, R. B. (1957). Aust. Vet. J. 33, 92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deanesly, R. (1934). Phil. Trans. B, 223, 238.Google Scholar
Duran, A. & Duran, G. (1955). Rev. Med. Vet. 55, 7.Google Scholar
Duran, A. (1956). Rev. Med. Vet. 56, 11.Google Scholar
Dutt, R. H. (1953). J. Anim. Sci. 12, 515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutt, R. H. (1954). J. Anim. Sci. 13, 464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutt, R. H., Ellington, E. F. & Carlton, W. W. (1956). J. Anim. Sci. 15, 1287.Google Scholar
Dutt, R. H. & Hamm, P. T. (1957). J. Anim. Sci. 16, 328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutt, R. H. & Simpson, S. (1954). J. Anim. Sci. 13, 1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastoe, R. D., Sutton, P. B. & McDonald, J. (1948). Agric. Gaz. N.S.W. 59, 93.Google Scholar
Edgar, D. G. (1954). Nature, Lond., 173, 639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgar, D. G. (1958 a). Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 18, 97.Google Scholar
Edgar, D. G. (1958 b). Sheepfmg. Ann. p. 185.Google Scholar
Edgar, D. G. (1962). J. Reprod. Fertil. 3, 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgar, D. G. & Ronaldson, I. (1958). J. Endocrinol. 16, 378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. S., Simpson, E. C. & Dutt, R. H. (1961). J. Anim. Sci. 20, 969 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Gordon, I. (1958 a). J. Agric. Sci. 50, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, I. (1958 b). J. Agric. Sci. 50, 152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, R. (1934). Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 58, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, W. W. (1947). Amer. J. Vet. Res. 8, 229.Google Scholar
Gunn, R. M. C., Sanders, R. M. & Granger, W. (1942). Bull. C.S.I.R.O. (Aust.), no. 148.Google Scholar
Hafez, E. S. E. (1952). J. Agric. Sci. 42, 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamm, P. T. (1954). MS. Thesis, University of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. Jr., (1944). J. Agric. Sci. 34, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J. Jr., (1945). J. Endocrinol. 4, 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansel, W. & Trimberger, G. W. (1952). J. Dairy Sci. 35, 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, D. S. (1950). J. Agric. Sci. 40, 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, D. S. (1956). Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 16, 101.Google Scholar
Henderson, H. E. & Henneman, H. A. (1957). J. Anim. Sci. 16, 1107.Google Scholar
Henneman, H. A. (1953). Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Hinds, F. C., Dziuk, P. J. & Lewis, J. M. (1961). J. Anim. Sci. 20, 972 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Hogue, D. E., Hansel, W. & Bratton, R. W. (1961). J. Anim. Sci. 20, 972 (Abstr.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooker, C. W. & Forbes, T. R. (1947). Endocrinology, 41, 158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulet, C. V., El-Sheikh, A. S., Pope, A. L. & Casida, L. E. (1956). J. Anim. Sci. 15, 617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulet, C. V., Ercanbrack, S. K., Price, D. A., Blackwell, R. L. & Wilson, L. O. (1961). J. Anim. Sci. 20, 972 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Hulet, C. V., Voigtlander, H. P., Pope, A. L. & Casida, L. E. (1956). J. Anim. Sci. 15, 607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, G. L. (1954). J. Endocrinol. 10 (Proc), p. xiii.Google Scholar
Hunter, G. L., Bishop, G. P. & Brown, D. L. (1958). J. Agric. Sci. 51, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, J. S. M. & Robertson, H. (1960). Nature, Lond., 188, 585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, K. R., Ross, R. H. & Fourt, D. L. (1958). J. Anim. Sci. 17, 386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kammlade, W. G., Welch, J. A., Nalbandov, A. V. & Norton, H. W. (1952). J. Anim. Sci. 11, 646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempf, R. (1949). C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 143, 1006.Google Scholar
Koger, M. (1951). Bull. New Mexico Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 366.Google Scholar
Kupperman, H. S. & Leftkovics, S. C. (1957). Fert. & Ster. 8, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labban, F. M. (1957). J. Agric. Sci. 49, 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laffey, N. & Hart, D. S. (1959). N.Z.J. Agric. Res. 2, 1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambourne, L. J. (1955). N.Z.J. Sci. Tech. A, 37, 187.Google Scholar
Lambourne, L. J. (1956). Proc. Ruakura Fmr's Conf. no. 16.Google Scholar
Lamond, D. R. (1960). Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 3, 120.Google Scholar
Lamond, D. R. & Lambourne, L. J. (1961). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 12, 154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, S. L., Hisaw, F. L. & Fevold, H. L. (1952). Amer. J. Physiol. 100, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, D. R. & Robinson, T. J. (1961 a). J. Agric.Sci. 57, 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, D. R. & Robinson, T. J. (1961 b). J. Agric. Sci. 57, 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lishman, A. W. & Hunter, G. L. (1961). S. Afr. J. Agric. Sci. 4, 35.Google Scholar
Lopyrin, A. I. & Loginova, N. V. (1957). Proc. Lenin. Acad. agric. Sci. 22, 40.Google Scholar
Mansour, A. M. (1957). Ph.D. Thesis, Cambridge University.Google Scholar
McDonald, M. F. & Rowson, L. E. (1961). Proc. IVth Int. Congr. Anim. Reprod. and A.I. Physiol. Sect. (The Hague.) 2, 392.Google Scholar
McKenzie, F. F. & Berliner, V. (1937). Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 265.Google Scholar
Means, T. M. & Andrews, F. N. (1958). Amer. J. Vet. Sci. 19, 295.Google Scholar
Miller, R. F., Hart, G. H. & Cole, H. H. (1942). Bull. Calif. Agric. Exp. Sta. No. 672.Google Scholar
Moore, N. W. & Robinson, T. J. (1957). J. Endocrinol. 15, 360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, N. W. & Rowson, L. E. (1959). Nature, Lond., 184, 1410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neher, B. H. & Fraps, R. M. (1950). Endocrinology, 46, 482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nellor, J. E. & Ahrenhold, J. E. (1960). The Physiologist, 3.Google Scholar
Nellor, J. E., Ahrenhold, J. E., First, N. L. & Hoefer, J. A. (1961). J. Anim. Sci. 20, 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noyes, R. W., Dickmann, Z., Doyle, L. L. & Gates, A. H. (1961). Proc. IVth Int. Congr. Anim. Reprod. and A.I. Physiol. Sect. (The Hague.) 3, 593.Google Scholar
Olds, D. & Vandemark, N. L. (1957). Fert. & Ster. 8, 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Mary, C. C., Pope, A. L. & Casida, L. E. (1950). J. Anim. Sci. 9, 400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortavant, R. & Thibault, G. (1956). C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 150, 358.Google Scholar
Palsson, H. (1962). J. Reprod. Fertil. 3, 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, C. A. (1950). Anat. Rec. 106, 233.Google Scholar
Phillips, R. W., Fraps, R. M. & Frank, A. N. (1946). The Problem of Fertility. Ed. Engle, E., Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Polovceva, V. V. & Judovic, S. S. (1939). Trod. Inst. Ovecvod. Kozovod, no. 10, 125.Google Scholar
Pursel, V. G. & Graham, E. F. (1962). J. Anim. Sci. 21, 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raeside, J. I. & Lamond, D. R. (1956). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 7, 591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raeside, J. I. & Turner, C. W. (1955). J. Dairy Sci. 38, 1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, T. J. (1950). J. Agric. Sci. 40, 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, T. J. (1951 a). Biol. Rev. 26, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, T. J. (1951 b). J. Agric. Sci. 41, 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, T. J. (1952). Nature, Lond., 170, 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, T. J. (1954 a). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 5, 730.Google Scholar
Robinson, T. J. (1954 b). J. Endocrinol. 10, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, T. J. (1955). J. Agric. Sci. 46, 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, T. J. (1956). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 7, 194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, T. J. (1959). Reproduction in Domestic Animals. Ed. Cole, H. H. and Cupps, P. T.. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, T. J. (1960). Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 20, 42.Google Scholar
Robinson, T. J. (1961). J. Agric. Sci. 57, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, T. J., Moore, N. W. & Binet, F. E. (1956). J. Endocrinol. 14, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowson, L. E. (1951). J. Endocrinol. 7, 260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanger, V. L., Engle, P. H. & Bell, D. S. (1958). Amer. J. Vet. Res. 19, 288.Google Scholar
Schinkel, P. G. (1954). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 5, 465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, K., Altenkirch, W. & Bachnick, G. (1960). Zuchrhyg. Fort. Pfl. Stor Besam Haustiere, 4, 263 (Ann. B. Abstr. 29, no. 1509).Google Scholar
Schoop, G. & Klette, H. (1955). Dtsch. tierärztl. Wschr, 62, 461.Google Scholar
Sinclair, A. N. (1957). Aust. Vet. J. 33, 88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulov, V. V. (1959). Veterinarija, 36, 12 (An. B. Abstr. 28, no. 1412.)Google Scholar
Thibault, G., Laplaud, M. & Ortavant, R. (1948). C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 226, 2006.Google Scholar
Vander Noot, P., Reece, R. P. & Skelley, W. C. (1946). J. Anim. Sci. 5, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varadin, M. (1957). Veterinaria, Sarajevo, 6, 346.Google Scholar
Wagner, J. F. & Bush, L. F. (1961). J. Anim. Sci. 20, 980 (Abstr.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, J. F., Henneman, H. A., Nellor, J. E. & Reineke, E. P. (1957). J. Anim. Sci. 16, 1097 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Wagner, J. F., Reineke, E. P., Nellor, J. E. & Henneman, H. A. (1960). J. Anim. Sci. 19, 607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, L. R. (1955). N.Z.J. Agric. 91, 495.Google Scholar
Warren, E. P., Lowrey, R. S. Jr., Maner, J. H., Danion, J. R. & Carmon, J. L. (1957). J. Anim. Sci. 16, 1103 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Whitten, W. K. (1958). J. Endocrinol. 16, 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, S. M. (1954). J. Agric. Sci. 54, 202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. L., Godley, W. G. & Hurst, V. (1961). J. Anim. Sci. 20, 693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiltbank, J. N., Hawk, H. W., Kidder, H. E., Black, W. G., Ulberg, L. G. & Casida, L. E. (1956). J. Dairy Sci. 39, 456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeates, N. T. M. (1949). J. Agric. Sci. 39, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimbelman, R. G., Pope, A. L. & Casida, L. E. (1957). J. Anim. Sci. 16, 1098 (Abstr.).Google Scholar