Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:47:03.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improvements in calcined magnesite as a magnesium fertilizer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. J. Durrant
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds
A. P. Draycott
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds

Summary

A laboratory and glasshouse study investigated whether it was possible to improve the availability of magnesium from calcined magnesite (MgO). Samples varying from largely unchanged magnesite (MgCO3) to overburnt MgO were made by calcining small quantities of magnesite ore for up to 6 h at several temperatures between 500 and 1000 °C in the laboratory. The effect of calcining conditions on weight loss on ignition, particle size distribution, total, water-soluble and NH4+ -exchangeable Mg was determined and results compared with the current commercial oxide and kieserite (MgSO4. H2O).

The results indicated that an oxide could be produced containing nearly double the amount of readily-exchangeable Mg of the oxide used at present. The analysis showed that the most reactive oxide was produced either by burning for 3 h at 700 °C or about half-an-hour at 800 °C, i.e. the minimum time at each temperature for complete conversion of the carbonate to the oxide. Either of these two oxides increased the Mg in plants of the three crops grown in the glasshouse by 0·3% on average, whereas plants given the commercial oxide increased it by only 0·2%. The three crops removed about 70% of the applied Mg from the most reactive oxides but only 50% of the Mg from the commercial oxide. The results of an incubation experiment suggested that burning at 700 °C for 3 h gave a marginally more reactive oxide than the short burn at 800 °C. However, the most reactive oxide produced supplied magnesium at a slower rate than kieserite. This may not necessarily be a disadvantage since most of the soils where Mg deficiency of sugar beet and similar crops is a potential problem need a Mg fertilizer which maintains or gradually increases soil Mg. Thus the improved oxide may bo suitable and a comparison in field experiments of the effects of kieserite and oxides produced under different calcining conditions is needed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Development and Advisory Service (1973). Fertilizer recommendations. Bulletin 209, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.Google Scholar
Anon. (1968). The Fertilisers and Feeding Stuffs Regulations. No. 218. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Bolton, J. (1973). Sources of magnesium for sugar beet, potatoes and wheat grown on an acid sandy soil at Woburn, Beds. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 81, 553–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britton, H. T. S., Gregg, S. J. & Winsor, G. W. (1952). The heat treatment of dolomite. I. The ‘Activity’ of lime and of magnesia in relation to their temperature of preparation. Journal of Applied Chemistry 2, 693703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, R. R. (1967). The effect of applied magnesium on the uptake of magnesium by, and on the yield of, arable crops. Technical Bulletin of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food No. 14, 110–25.Google Scholar
Church, B. M. (1974). Survey of Fertilizer Practice in Great Britain. Agricultural Development and Advisory Service, Rothamsted Statistics Department and the Fertiliser Manufacturers' Association.Google Scholar
Draycott, A. P. & Durrant, M. J. (1969). The effects of magnesium fertilizers on yield and chemical composition of sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 72, 319–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P. & Durrant, M. J. (1970). The relationship between exchangeable soil magnesium and response by sugar beet to magnesium sulphate. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 75, 137–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P. & Durrant, M. J. (1972 a), The immediate and long-term value of some magnesium fertilizers for sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 79, 463–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P. & Durrant, M. J. (1972 b). Comparisons of kieserite and calcined magnesite for sugar beet grown on sandy soils. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 79, 455–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P., Durrant, M. J. & Bennett, S. N. (1975).Availability to arable crops of magnesium from kieserite and two forms of calcined magnesite. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 84, 475–80.Google Scholar
Harper, F. C. (1967). Effect of calcination temperature on the properties of magnesium oxides for use in oxychloride cements. Journal of Applied Chemistry 17, 510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reith, J. W. S. (1967). Effects of soil magnesium levels and of magnesium dressings on crop yield and composition. Technical Bulletin of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, No. 14, 97109.Google Scholar
Tinker, P. B. H. (1967). The effects of magnesium sulphate on sugar-beet yield and its interactions with other fertilizers. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 68, 205–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar