Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T14:35:26.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growth, tissue deposition and metabolism studies in growing pigs given low glucosinolate rapeseed meal diets containing different amounts of copper and polyethylene glycol

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. Rowan
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool, Department of Animal Husbandry, Veterinary Field Station, Neston, South Wirral, L64 7TE
T. L. J. Lawrence
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool, Department of Animal Husbandry, Veterinary Field Station, Neston, South Wirral, L64 7TE

Summary

In three factorial growth experiments and a metabolism experiment pigs of approximately 25 kg initial live weight were given on a restricted scale of feeding simple diets, based on barley, a vitamin and mineral supplement and either soya-bean meal (SBM) or a low glucosinolate rapeseed meal (cv. Tower; TRSM). Variations in these two basic diets were produced by adding different quantities of tannic acid, polyethylene glycol (PEG) and copper (Cu).

Diets based on soya-bean meal were used in the first experiment. There were no significant interactions. Tannic acid added at 3·75 and 7·50 g/kg air-dry matter was without significant effect on performance compared with no tannic acid addition, but PEG at 17 g/kg air-dry matter significantly improved growth rate compared with no PEG addition to the diet (P < 0·05). In the second experiment TRSM-based diets were used. There were no significant interactions and no significant effects on performance from adding 0, 8·5 and 17·0 g PEG/kg air-dry matter. Increasing Cu from 17 to 54 mg/kg air-dry diet significantly improved growth rate (P < 0·05). In the third experiment TRSM and SBM based diets, of similar digestible energy (DE), crude protein and lysine content, and containing either 19 or 202 mg Cu/kg air-dry matter, were used. Pigs were slaughtered at 87·5 kg live weight and hand joints dissected. Pigs given the TRSM diet containing 19 mg Cu/kg grew significantly more slowly than pigs given the three other diets between which there were no significant differences. There were no other significant interactions and no significant differences between Cu concentrations for the growth, carcass and efficiency of conversion results. Compared with TRSM diets, SBM diets at similar slaughter weights gave significantly greater carcass weights, killingout proportions and backfat thicknesses. Also the efficiencies with which dietary protein and DE were used to promote units of carcass growth were significantly better for the SBM diets, but there were no significant differences in the estimated weights of lean in carcasses.

In the metabolism experiments the effects of adding PEG to diets similar to those used in the growth experiments were examined. The apparent digestibilities of dry matter, gross energy and nitrogen and the nitrogen retentions were significantly greater for the SBM diets than for the TRSM diets. The addition of PEG to the SBM and TRSM diets significantly decreased the apparent digestibilities of dry matter and gross energy, and significantly increased the apparent digestibility of nitrogen in the SBM diet but not in the TRSM diet.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council (1981). The Nutrient Requirements of Pigs. Slough, England: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Allen, M. M., Barber, R. S., Braude, R. & Mitchell, K. G. (1961). Further studies on various aspects of the use of high-copper supplements for growing pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 15, 507522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babber, R. S., Bowland, J. P., Braude, R., Mitchell, K. G. & Porter, J. W. G. (1961). Copper sulphate and copper sulphide (CuS) as supplements for growing pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 15, 189197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, T. N. & Duncan, S. J. (1984). The role of condensed tannins in the nutritive value of Lotus pedunculatus for sheep. 1. Voluntary intake. British Journal of Nutrition 51, 485491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, J. M. & Shires, A. (1982). Composition and digestibility by pigs of hull fractions from rapeseed cultivars with yellow or brown seed coats. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 62, 557565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braude, R. (1965). Copper as a growth stimulant in pigs. In Cuprum Pro Vita, Symposium Transactions, pp. 5566. London: Copper Development Association.Google Scholar
Cooke, B. C., Filmer, D. G., Wilson, P. N., Hall, G. R., Speight, D. & Roberts, P. (1979). Some aspects of a survey on the growth response of pigs. Animal Production 28, 436437.Google Scholar
Cuthbertson, A. (1968). PIDA dissection techniques. In Proceedings of a Symposium on Methods of Carcass Evaluation. Dublin: European Association of Animal Production.Google Scholar
De Goey, L. W., Wahlstrom, R. C. & Emerick, R. J. (1971). Studies of high level copper supplementation to ratios for growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 33, 5257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durke, A. B. (1971). The nature of tannin in rapeseed (Brassica campestris). Phytochemistry 10, 15831585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggum, B. O. & Christensen, K. D. (1975). Influence of tannin on protein utilization in feedstuffs with special reference to barley. In Breeding for Seed Protein Improvement Using Nuclear Techniques, Proceedings of a Research Coordinating Meeting, Ibadan, 1973, pp. 135143. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Evans, D. G. & Kempster, A. J. (1979). A comparison of different predictors of the lean content of pig carcasses. 2. Predictors for use in population studies and experiments. Animal Production 28, 97108.Google Scholar
Fenwick, R. G. & Hoggan, S. A. (1976). The tannin content of rapeseed meals. British Poultry Science 17, 5962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, J. E. & Hewitt, D. (1979 a). Protein quality in cereals and pulses. 1. Application of microbiological and other in vitro methods in the evaluation of rice (Oryza sativa L.), sorghum (Sorghum vulgare Pers.), barley and field beans (Viciafaba L.). British Journal of Nutrition 41, 341352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, J. E. & Hewitt, D. (1979 b). Protein quality in cereals and pulses. 2. Influence of polyethyleneglycol on the nutritional availability of methionine in sorghum (Sorghum vulgare Pers.), field beans (Vicia faba L.) and barley. British Journal of Nutrition 42, 317323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ford, J. E. & Hewitt, D. (1979 c). Protein quality in cereals and pulses. 3. Bioassays with rats and chickens on sorghum (Sorghum vulgare Pers.), barley and field beans (Viciafaba L.). Influence of polyethylene glycol on digestibility of the protein in high-tannin grain. British Journal of Nutrition 42, 325340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, D. W. & Moseley, G. (1980). The effect of diets containing field beans of high or low polyphenolic content on the activity of digestive enzymes in the intestines of rats. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 31, 255259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kempster, A. J. & Evans, D. G. (1979). A comparison of different predictors of the lean content of pig carcasses. 1. Predictors for use in commercial classification and grading. Animal Production 28, 8796.Google Scholar
Kirchgessner, M., Beyer, M. G. & Steinhart, H. (1976). Activation of pepsin (EC 3.4.4.1) by heavy metal ions including a contribution to the mode of action of copper sulphate in pig nutrition. British Journal of Nutrition 36, 1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotb, A. R. & Luckey, T. D. (1972). Markers in nutrition. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews 42, 813845.Google ScholarPubMed
Leung, J., Fenton, T. W., Muller, M. M. & Clandinin, D. R. (1979). Condensed tannins of rapeseed meal. Journal of Food Science 44, 13131316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, M. N. (1974). Plant tannins – their role in forage quality. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews 44, 803815.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1973). The Analysis of Agricultural Materials. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
O'Connor, J. J. (1980). Mechanisms of growth promoters in single-stomach animals. In Growth in Animals (ed. Lawrence, T. J. L.), pp. 207227. London: Butterworths.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omole, T. A. & Bowland, J. P. (1974). Copper, iron and manganese supplementation of pig diets containing either soybean meal or low glucosinolate rapeseed meal. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 54, 481493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowan, T. G. (1983). Studies on the utilization of low glucosinolate rapeseed meals in the growing pig. Ph.D. thesis, University of Liverpool, Liverpool.Google Scholar
Rowan, T. G. & Lawrence, T. L. J. (1986 a). Effects on nutritive value for growing pigs of pelleting diets containing low glucosinolate rapeseed meals. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107, 735737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowan, T. G. & Lawrence, T. L. J. (1986 b). Growth and metabolism studies in growing pigs given diets containing a low glucosinolate rapeseed meal. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107, 483492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowan, T. G. & Lawrence, T. L. J. (1986 c). Heal apparent digestibilities of amino acids, growth and tissue deposition in growing pigs fed low glucosinolate rapeseed meals. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107, 493504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarwar, F., Bell, J. M., Sharby, T. F. & Jones, J. D. (1981). Nutritional evaluation of meals and meal fractions derived from rape and mustard seed. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 61, 719733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, G. P., Smith, W. C. & Briggs, P. A. (1980). A note on the influence of mioronization and polyethylene glycol on the nutritional value of brown sorghum for growing pigs. Animal Production 30, 157160.Google Scholar
Singleton, V. L. & Kratzer, F. H. (1969). Toxicity and related physiological activity of phenolic substances of plant origin. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 17, 497501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar