Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T08:17:07.945Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The growth of lambs before and after birth in relation to the level of nutrition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

L. R. Wallace
L. R. Wallace
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge and Animal Research Station, Ruakura, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In the investigation described in this third part of the work, we have studied the effect of imposing two extreme levels of diet upon the pregnant ewe during two periods, one of early and one of late, gestation. In order to build up a comprehensive picture of the effect of these treatments we have been concerned, first, with the changes that they have wrought in the tissues and organs of the mother's body; secondly, with the effect upon the growth and development of the genital tract and its major components, and lastly with the way in which the growth of the tissues and organs of the foetus have responded to the different nutritive levels. While the latter has been our primary concern, the former have been studied in some detail so that we may view the effects produced as a whole, and gain an understanding of any competition that may have occurred between maternal and foetal tissues.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 38 , Issue 4 , October 1948 , pp. 367 - 401
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Appleton, A. B. (1929). C.R. Ass. Anat., 24th Meeting, Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Aron, H. (1911). Philipp. J. Sci. 6, 1.Google Scholar
Assheton, R. (1906). Philos. Trans. B, 198, 143.Google Scholar
Baker, G. A. & Guilbert, H. R. (1942). J. Anim. Sci. 1, 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barcroft, J. (1944). Proc. Nutrit. Soc. 2, 14.Google Scholar
Barcroft, J. (1945). J. Physiol. 104, 32P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barcroft, J. & Barron, D. H. (1946). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Barcroft, J. & Kennedy, J. A. (1939). J. Physiol. 95, 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnicoat, C. R. (1943). Proc. 3rd Ann. Conf. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod.Google Scholar
Bell, P. (1944). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Bergmann, R. (1921). Arch. Wiss. prakt. Tierheilk. 47, 292.Google Scholar
Besana, C. (1892). Chem. Ztg, 16, 1519.Google Scholar
Best, C. H. & Taylor, N. B. (1943). The Physiological Basis of Medical Practice. London.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1944). J. Agric. Sci. 34, 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonsma, F. N. (1939). Univ. Pretoria Publ. Series I, Agric. no. 48.Google Scholar
Bonsma, F. N. (1944). Farming in South Africa. Pretoria.Google Scholar
Bonsma, F. N. & Oosthuizen, P. M. (1935). S. Afr. J. Sci. 32, 360.Google Scholar
Bourne, A. W. (1944). Proc. Nutrit. Soc. 2, 3.Google Scholar
Boyd, W. (1944). The Pathology of Internal Diseases. London.Google Scholar
Boyd, J. D., Hamilton, W. J. & Hammond, J. Jr. (1944). J. Anat., Lond., 78, 5.Google Scholar
Brash, J. C. (1934). Edinb. Med. J., N.S., 41, 305.Google Scholar
Brody, S. (1927). J. Gen. Physiol. 10, 631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, S.: (1945). Bioenergetics and Growth. New York.Google Scholar
Brody, S. & Cunningham, R. (1936). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 238.Google Scholar
Brody, S. & Proctor, R. C. (1933). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 193.Google Scholar
Brody, S. & Proctor, R. C. (1935). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 222.Google Scholar
Brody, S. & Ragsdale, A. C. (1926). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 96.Google Scholar
Brovar, V. J. (1944). Sbornik Haucnyx Rabot zootehniceskogo Fakul'teta Trudy Vypuskzi Timirjuzev. Sel'skohozjaistvehhaja Akademia. Moscow.Google Scholar
Carlyle, W. L. (1903). Bull. Wis. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 104.Google Scholar
Chapman, A. B. & Lush, J. L. (1932). J. Hered. 23, 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. T. (1931). Proc. 24th Ann. Meet. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 207.Google Scholar
Clark, R. T. (1934). Anat. Rec. 60, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. T. (1934a). Anat. Rec. 60, 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cloete, J. H. L. (1939). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci. 13, 417.Google Scholar
Cowdry, E. W. (1932). Special Cytology. New York.Google Scholar
Curson, H. H. (1934). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci. 3, 133.Google Scholar
Curson, H. H. & Malan, A. P. (1935). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci. 4, 481.Google Scholar
Curson, H. H. & Maré, G. S. (1934). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci. 3, 477.Google Scholar
Davies, L. R. (1904). 21st Ann. Rep. Wis. Agric. Exp. Sta.Google Scholar
Donald, H. P. (1937). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 5, 361.Google Scholar
Donald, H. P. & McLean, J. W. (1935). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. 17, 497.Google Scholar
Donaldson, H. H. (1911). J. Comp. Neurol. 2, 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draper, R. L. (1920). Anat. Rec. 18, 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckles, C. H. (1913). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 7.Google Scholar
Eckles, C. H. (1919). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 35.Google Scholar
Eckles, C. H. & Shaw, R. H. (1913). Bull. U.S. Bur. Anim. Ind. no. 155.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. (1936). J. Dairy Res. 7, 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fihol, & Joly, (1858). C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 47, 1013.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. B., Braman, W. W., Kriss, M., French, R. B., Smythe, C. U., Williams, P. S. & Williams, H. H. (1928). J. Agric. Res. 37, 253.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. B., Braman, W. W., Kriss, M., French, R. B., Smythe, C. U., Williams, P. S. & Williams, H. H. (1930). J. Agric. Res. 40, 37.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. B. & Kriss, M. (1932). J. Nutrit. 5, 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, A. H. H., Godden, W., Snook, L. C. & Thomson, W. (1938). J. Physiol. 94, 346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, J. G. & Kleinheinz, F. (1904). 21st Ann. Rep. Wis. Agric. Exp. Sta.Google Scholar
Gaines, W. L. (1928). Bull. Ill. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 308.Google Scholar
Gaines, W. L. (1938). J. Dairy Sci. 20, 583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galpin, N. (1935). J. Agric. Sci. 25, 344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godden, W. & Puddy, C. A. (1935). J. Dairy Res. 6, 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gohben, S. (1865). Landw. Versuchsw. 7, 351.Google Scholar
Gowen, J. W. (1933). J. Agric. Sci. 23, 485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grady, R. I. (1917). Mon. Bull. Ohio Agric. Exp. Sta. ii, no. 12.Google Scholar
Haecker, T. L. (1914). Bull. Minn. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 140.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. J., Boyd, J. D. & Mossman, H. W. (1945). Human Embryology. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1914). J. Agric. Sci. 6, 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J. (1927). The Physiology of Reproduction in the Cow. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1932). Growth and Development of Mutton Qualities in the Sheep. Edinburgh and London.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1936). Vet. Rec. 16, 519.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1943). Proc. Nutrit. Soc. 2, 8.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. Jr. (1946). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. Jr. & Bhattacharya, P. (1944). J. Agric. Sci. 34, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, K. (1928): Arb. dtsch. Ges. Zücht. 37. Quoted by Bonsma (1939)Google Scholar
Henry, W. A. & Woll, F. W. (1897). Ann. Rep. Wis. Agric. Exp. Sta. p. 10.Google Scholar
Holland, E. (1922). Rep. Publ. Hlth Med. Subj. Lond. no. 7. Quoted by Bourne (1944).Google Scholar
Hucho, H. (1897). Landw. Jb. 26, 496. Quoted by Ritzman (1917).Google Scholar
Hughes, E. H. & Hart, H. G. (1935). J. Nutrit. 9, 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, J. S. (1924). Nature, Lond., 114, 895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, J. S. (1932). Problems of Relative Growth. London.Google Scholar
Ibsen, H. L. (1928). J. Exp. Zool. 51, 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, C. M. (1909). Amer. J. Anat. 9, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, C. M. (1913). Amer. J. Anat. 15, 1.Google Scholar
Jackson, C. M. (1914). Amer. J. Anat. 15, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, C. M. (1915a). J. Exp. Zool. 19, 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, C. M. (1915b). Amer. J. Anat. 18, 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, E., Klein, J. W., Rauchenstein, E., Wood-Ward, T. E. & Smith, R. H. (1942). Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 815.Google Scholar
Johansson, I. (1932). Z. Zucht. B, 24, 165.Google Scholar
Jonson, A. (1909). Arch. mikr. Anat. 73, 390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, E. & Reiman, S. P. (1929). Pathology for Students and Practitioners. London.Google Scholar
Kearney, H. L. (1914). Anat. Rec. 8, 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, H. D. (1915). Anat. Rec. 9, 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kislovsky, D. A. & Larchin, B. A. (1931). J. Agric. Sci. 21, 659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konig, J. (1903). Chemie der menschlichen Nahrungs und Genuss-mittel, 4th ed. 1, 265. Berlin.Google Scholar
Konnov, M. G. (1944). Sbornik Haucnyx Robot zootehniceskogo Fakul'teta Trudy Vypuskzi Timirjuzev. Sel'skohozjaistvehhaja Akademia. Moscow.Google Scholar
Kriss, M. (1931). J. Nutrit. 4, 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krizenecky, & Kudlicka, (1944). Z. Tierz. ZüchtBiol. 3, 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudo, T. (1921a). J. Exp. Zool. 33, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudo, T. (1921b). J. Exp. Zool. 33, 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latimer, H. B. (1934). Anat. Rec. 60, 23.Google Scholar
Latimer, H. B. & Aikman, J. M. (1931). Anat. Rec. 48, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, I. M. (1937). Hilgardia, 10, 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowrey, L. G. (1911). Amer. J. Anat. 12, 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malan, A. P. & Curson, H. H. (1936a). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci. 7, 239.Google Scholar
Malan, A. P. & Curson, H. H. (1936b). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci. 7, 251.Google Scholar
Malan, A. P. & Curson, H. H. (1937). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci. 8, 417.Google Scholar
Malan, A. I., Malan, A. P. & Curson, H. H. (1937). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci. 9, 205.Google Scholar
Marshall, F. H. A. & Hammond, J. (1945). Bull. Minist. Agric, Lond., no. 39.Google Scholar
Maule, J. P. (1937). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 5, 298.Google Scholar
McDowell, E. C., Allen, E. & McDowell, C. G. (1927). J. Gen. Physiol. 11, 57.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. C. (1930). Circ. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 114.Google Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1940a). J. Agric. Sci. 30, 276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1940b). J. Agric. Sci. 30, 387.Google Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1941). J. Agric. Sci. 31. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1945). Principles of Animal Production. Auckland.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. H. & Hamilton, T. S. (1932). J. Agric. Res. 45, 163.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. H., Kammlade, W. G. & Hamilton, T. S. (1926). Bull. Ill. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 283.Google Scholar
Moment, G. B. (1933). J. Exp. Zool. 65, 359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, F. B. (1923). Feeds and Feeding. New York.Google Scholar
Muhlberg, (1936). Dtsch. Landw. Tierz. 38, 698.Google Scholar
Murray, J. A. (1921). J. Agric. Sci. 2, 258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, J. (1931). Chemical Embryology. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, J. (1942). Biochemistry and Morphogenesis. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Neidig, R. E. & Iddings, E. J. (1919). J. Agric. Res. 17, 19.Google Scholar
Nichols, J. E. (1924). J. Minist. Agric. 31, 835.Google Scholar
Olofsson, N. E. & Larsson, S. (1930). Medd. Cent-Anst. Försöksv. Jordbr., Stockh., p. 371. Quoted by Bonsma (1939).Google Scholar
Ostertag, R. & Zuntz, N. (1908). Landw. Jb. 37, 201.Google Scholar
Outhouse, J. & Mendel, L. B. (1933). J. Exp. Zool. 64, 257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overman, O. R. & Sanmann, F. P. (1926). Bull. Ill. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 282.Google Scholar
Palsson, H. (1939). J. Agric. Sci. 29, 544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palsson, H. (1940). J. Agric. Sci. 30, 1.Google Scholar
Paton, D. N., Watson, B. P. & Kerr, J. (1907). Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 46, 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, A. W. (1934). Aust. J. Exp. Biol. Med. Sci. 12, 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, R. W. (1936). Bull. Mass. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 327.Google Scholar
Phillips, R. W. (1937). Bull. Mass. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 339.Google Scholar
Phillips, R. W. & Dawson, W. M. (1940). Circ. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 538.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, R. W. (1941). J. Agric. Sci. 31, 50.Google Scholar
Quin, E. J., King, C. G. & Dimit, B. B. (1929). J. Nutrit. 2, 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinlan, J. & Maré, G. S. (1931). 17th Rep. Vet. Serv. Anim. Ind. S. Afr.Google Scholar
Ragsdale, A. C. & Turner, C. W. (1922). J. Dairy Sci. 5, 22.Google Scholar
Ritzman, E. G. (1917). J. Agric. Res. 8, 29.Google Scholar
Roberts, E. (1921). J. Agric. Res. 12, 231.Google Scholar
Roderick, L. M. & Harshfield, G. S. (1932). Tech. Bull. N. Dak. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 261.Google Scholar
Roderick, L. M., Harshfield, G. S. & Hawn, M. C. (1937). J. Amer. Vet. Med. Ass. 90, 41.Google Scholar
Sanna, A. (1905). Staz. sper. agr. ital. 38, 289.Google Scholar
Savage, E. S. (1912). Bull. Cornell Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 323.Google Scholar
Scammon, R. E. & Kittleson, J. A. (1927). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol., N.Y., 24, 303.Google Scholar
Scheingraber, M. (1933). Z. Zucht B, 28, 85.Google Scholar
Schmidt, J. & Lauprecht, E. (1926). Zuchtungskunde, 1. Quoted by Bonsma (1939).Google Scholar
Shier, F. L. & Davenport, N. (1936). J. Dep. Agric. W. Aust. 13, 260.Google Scholar
Smith, A. H. & Schultz, R. V. (1930). Amer. J. Physiol. 94, 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. A. (1946). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1946). Statistical Methods, 4th ed.Iowa.Google Scholar
Snell, M. G. (1933). Proc. 26th Ann. Meet. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. (1918). J. Exp. Zool. 25, 301.Google Scholar
Stewart, C. A. (1919). Amer. J: Physiol. 48, 67.Google Scholar
Thomson, W. & Fraser, A. H. H. (1939). Scot. J. Agric. 22, 71.Google Scholar
Trautmann, A. (1933). Arch. Tierenahr. Tierz. 9, 575.Google Scholar
Trautmann, A. & Schmitt, J. (1935). Dtsch. tierarztl. Wschr. 43, 177.Google Scholar
Trillat, & Forestier, (1902). J. Agric. Prat. Paris, 4, 38. Quoted by Ritzman (1917).Google Scholar
Underwood, E. J. & Shier, F. L. (1942). J. Dep. Agric. W. Aust. 19 (2nd series), 37.Google Scholar
Underwood, E. J., Shier, F. L. & Cariss, H. G. (1943). J. Dep. Agric. W. Aust. 20 (2nd series), 288.Google Scholar
Variot, G. & Lassablière, P. (1909). C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 66, 106.Google Scholar
Verges, J. B. (1939). Suffolk Sheep Society Yearbook.Google Scholar
Volcker, (1862). J. B. Agric. Soc. 23, 412.Google Scholar
Walker, D. E. & McMeekan, C. P. (1944). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. A, 26, 51.Google Scholar
Warwick, B. L. (1928). J. Morph. 46, 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, H. J. (1908). Proc. 29th Ann. Meet. Soc. Prom. Agric. Sci. N.Y. p. 71.Google Scholar
Waters, H. J. (1909). Proc. 30th Ann. Meet. Soc. Prom. Agric. Sci. N.Y. p. 70.Google Scholar
Watson, J. A. S., Skilbeck, D. & Ellis, J. C. B. (1937). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 5, 180.Google Scholar
Weiman, H. L. & Weichert, C. H. (1936). Anat. Rec. 65, 201.Google Scholar
Weiser, S. (1921). Landw. Versuchsw. 97, 131.Google Scholar
Weiske, H. & Kennepohl, G. (1881). J. Landw. Jahrg. 29, 451. Quoted by Godden & Puddy (1935).Google Scholar
Winters, L. M. & Feuffel, G. (1936). Tech. Bull. Minn. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 118.Google Scholar
Winters, J. C., Smith, A. H. & Mendel, L. B. (1927). Amer. J. Physiol. 80, 576.Google Scholar
Wood, T. B. (1927). Animal Nutrition. London.Google Scholar
Wood, T. B. & Woodman, H. E. (1939). Bull. Minist. Agric, Lond., No. 48.Google Scholar
Woodward, T. E., Shepherd, J. B. & Graves, R. R. (1933). Misc. Publ. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 179.Google Scholar
Zeitzchmann, O. (1923). Lehrbuch der Entwicklungsgeschichte der Haustiere. Berlin.Google Scholar