Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T11:36:59.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growth and venison production from red deer (Cervus elaphus) grazing red clover (Trifolium pratense) or perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne)/white clover (Trifolium repens) pasture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. Semiadi
Affiliation:
Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
T. N. Barry
Affiliation:
Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
P. R. Wilson
Affiliation:
Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
J. Hodgson
Affiliation:
Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
R. W. Purchas
Affiliation:
Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand

Summary

A study of growth and venison production from weaner red deer grazing pure tetraploid red clover (RC) or conventional perennial ryegrass/white clover (PRG) pasture was conducted in 1990, with the objective of attaining a minimum slaughter liveweight of 92 kg (50 kg carcass) by 12 months of age in the stags. Ten weaner red deer stags and ten weaner red deer hinds were randomly selected and rotationally grazed on either RC or PRG forage. In autumn and spring, forage allowances were 7 kgDM/hd/day and 8 kgDM/hd/day respectively. In winter, the animals from both groups were grazed together on PRG pasture, at a residual dry matter (DM) of 1100 kgDM/ha. Total nitrogen (N) concentration was higher in RC on offer than in PRG on offer (autumn 3·4 v. 3·1 %DM; spring 3·8 v. 3·1 %DM), whilst organic matter digestibility (OMD; autumn 80·5 v. 76·5%; spring 82·1 v. 80·3%) was also higher for RC on offer. Diet selected showed similar differences in total N concentration, but there were negligible differences between forages in OMD.

Liveweight gains of RC and PRG stags were respectively 263 v. 192 g/day, 101 v. 106 g/day and 354 v. 341 g/day during autumn, winter and spring, with the corresponding values for hinds being 198. 173 g/day, 52 v. 53 g/day and 242 v. 218 g/day. At one year of age, stags grazing RC were 7 kg heavier and hinds 3 kg heavier than animals grazing PRG pasture. Animals grazing RC forage had higher voluntary feed intake (VFI) in both autumn (P < 0·10) and spring (P < 0·001), than animals grazing PRG pasture.

All stags grazing RC forage reached the minimum slaughter liveweight by one year of age, compared to 75% of those grazing PRG pasture. At slaughter, stags that had grazed RC produced heavier carcass weights (59·9 v. 54·5 kg, P < 0·01), had higher carcass dressing percentage (55·3 v. 53·2 %; P < 0·01), and tended to have slightly greater carcass subcutaneous fat depth than stags grazing PRG pasture, but this effect disappeared when the data were corrected to equal carcass weight. All stags grazing RC produced velvet antler, relative to 75% of those grazing PRG; in stags producing harvestable velvet antler, there was no difference in antler weight between those grazing RC and PRG. It is concluded that RC offers potential as a special-purpose forage for the growth of weaner red deer.

Type
Animals
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ataja, A. M., Wilson, P. R., Barry, T. N., Hodgson, J., Hoskinson, R. M., Parker, W. J. & Purchas, R. W. (1992). Early venison production from red deer (Cervus elaphus) as affected by grazing perennial or annual ryegrass pastures, pasture surface height and immunization against melatonin. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 118, 353369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, T. N., Suttie, J. M., Milne, J. A. & Kay, R. N. B. (1991). Control of food intake in domesticated deer. In Physiological Aspects of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants (Eds Tsuda, T., Sasaki, Y. & Kawashima, R.), pp. 385402. San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, K. R. (1989). Venison research and development. Proceedings of a Deer Course for Veterinarians 6, 181186.Google Scholar
Hunt, W. F. & Hay, R. J. M. (1990). A photographic technique for assessing the pasture species performance of grazing animals. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 51, 191196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, R. N. B. (1985). Body size, patterns of growth and efficiency of production in red deer. In Biology of Deer Production (Eds Fennessy, P. F. & Drew, K. R.), pp. 411422. The Royal Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar
Kirton, A. H., Thorrold, B. S. & Mercer, G. J. K. (1989). Effect of liveweight gain or loss on lamb meat quality. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 49, 127131.Google Scholar
Niezen, J. H., Barry, T. N., Hodgson, J.Wilson, P. R., Ataja, A.M., Parker, W. J. & Holmes, C. W. (1993). Growth responses in red deer calves and hinds grazing red clover, chicory or perennial ryegrass/white clover swards during lactation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 121, 255263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, W. J., McCutcheon, S. N. & Carr, D. H. (1989). Effect of herbage type and level of intake on the release of chromic oxide from intraruminal controlled release capsules in sheep. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 32, 537546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roughan, P. G. & Holland, R. (1977). Predicting in-vivo digestibilities of herbages by exhaustive enzyme hydrolysis of cell walls. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 28, 10571064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis System. (1987). SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers. Version 6. Cary, US: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar