Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:09:06.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The growth and development of some barley varieties in response to irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

E. J. M. Kirby
E. J. M. Kirby
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, Trumpington, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In an experiment to investigate growth in relation to nitrogen concentration and nitrogen uptake, Proctor was compared with four other varieties of barley at two levels of irrigation and two levels of nitrogen fertilizer by means of weekly samples throughout the growing season. The varieties were Deba Abed, a new variety recommended for high fertility conditions where feeding quality grain is required, and three exotic varieties, chosen for their high concentration of nitrogen in the grain.

Irrigation stimulated tillering, although certain varieties responded more strongly than others; irrigation also led to a higher specific growth rate. Certain of the exotic varieties had high growth rates early in the season but growth fell off earlier due to earlier ear emergence. Maximum leaf area index was greater in the irrigated treatment at the high nitrogen fertilizer level. The adapted varieties had higher maximum leaf area indices than the exotic varieties, although some of the exotics had higher rates of leaf area growth early in the season; there were also differences in the way in which the varieties responded to irrigation. Irrigation and variety both affected the rate at which the percentage nitrogen in the shoot fell with time.

Analysis of these data indicates that nitrogen uptake early in the season was an important factor determining the total amount of nitrogen taken up by the plant. It was also shown that the relative rate of decline of the specific growth rate and the specific rate of nitrogen uptake differed between varieties. Analysis of the specific growth rate indicated that differences in leaf growth, rather than net assimilation rate, led to the varietal differences. The differential response to irrigation is discussed with reference to drought resistance.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 72 , Issue 3 , June 1969 , pp. 467 - 474
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Huxley, J. S. (1932). Problems of Relative growth. London: Methuon.Google Scholar
Johnson, V. A., Mattern, P. J. & Schmidt, J. W. (1967). Nitrogen relations during spring growth in varieties of Triticum aestivum L. differing in grain protein content. Crop Sci. 7, 664–7.Google Scholar
Kirby, E. J. M. (1968). The response of some barley varieties to irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 71, 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeal, F. H., Berg, M. A. & Watson, C. A. (1966). Nitrogen and dry matter in five spring wheat varieties at successive stages of development. Agron. J. 58, 605–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, E. J. & Bishop, L. R. (1933). Investigations on barley. Report on the ten years of experiments under the Institute of Brewing Research Scheme, 1922–1931. J. Inst. Brew. 30, 287–421.Google Scholar
Vernon, A. J. & Allison, J. C. S. (1963). A method of calculating net assimilation rate. Nature, Lond. 200, 814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar