Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:04:07.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genotypic variation in distribution of total and labelled zinc and availability of zinc (A and L values) to soya beans grown in Mollisol

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

V. S. Rao
Affiliation:
Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar {Uttar Pradesh), India
M. S. Gangwar
Affiliation:
Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar {Uttar Pradesh), India
V. S. Rathore
Affiliation:
Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar {Uttar Pradesh), India

Summary

Three soya-bean (Glycine max L.) genotypes (Bragg, Type I and Hark) were grown in Mollisol supplemented with 0, 2·5, 5·0 mg Zn/kg in pot-culture experiments. The genotypes showed significant differences in their capacity to absorb Zn. Maximum Zn accumulation was found in the genotype Bragg and minimum in Hark. The pattern of Zn distribution in plant parts was also different in the three genotypes and was differently affected by Zn application. The uptake and percentage distribution of 66Zn followed more or less the same trend as that of total Zn. The genotypes differed significantly in R(recovery), A(availability of native Zn) and L(labile soil Zn) value indicating that these three genotypes differed in their capacity for recovering applied and native Zn. The genotype Bragg had maximum R, A and L values. These results correspond well with the reported tolerance of these genotypes to Zn deficiency (Bragg > Type I > Hark).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, J. C, Ambler, J. E., Chaney, R. L. & Foy, C. D. (1972). Differential responses of plant genotypes to micronutrients. In Micronutrients in Agriculture (ed. Mortvedt, J. J., Giordana, P. M. and Lindsay, W. L., pp. 389418. Wisconsin: Soil Science Society of American corporation.Google Scholar
Gerloff, G. C. (1963). Comparative mineral nutrition of plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 14, 107–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1956). Soil Chemical Analysis. Advanced Course, University of Wisconsin, Madison, pp. 780–1.Google Scholar
Larsen, S. (1952). The use of phosphorus-32 in studies on the uptake of phosphorus by plants. Plant and Soil 4, 110.Google Scholar
Massey, H. F. & Loeffel, F. A. (1966). Variation in zinc content of grain from inbred lines of corn. Agronomy Journal 58, 143–4.Google Scholar
Massey, H. F. & Loeffel, F. A. (1967). Factors in interstrain variation in zinc content of maize (Zea mays L.) kernals. Agronomy Journal 59, 214–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathore, V. S., Bajaj, Y. P. S. & Wittwer, H. S. (1972). Subcellular localization of zinc and calcium in beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) tissues. Plant Physiology 49, 207–11.Google Scholar
Rennie, D. A. (1969). The significance of the A-value concept in field fertilizer studies. Study Group Meeting on the use of Isotopes and Radiation in Investigations on Fertilizer use Efficiency, Bangkok, Thailand.Google Scholar
Saxena, M. C. & Reddy, K. R. (1973). Differential susceptibility to Zn deficiency in soybean varieties. Indian Journal of Agronomy 18, 431–5.Google Scholar
Saxena, M. C. & Singh, Y. (1970). Relative susceptibility of important varieties of some pulses and soybean to deficiency of zinc. Proceedings of Third Annual Workshop on Coordinated Scheme of IGAR, New Delhi on Micronutrients in Soils, Ludhiana, India.Google Scholar
Vittal, K. P. R. & Gangwar, M. S. (1975). Prediction of available zinc in calcareous soils. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 23, 128–30.Google Scholar
Vose, P. B. (1963). Varietal differences in plant nutrition. Herbage Abstracts 33, 113.Google Scholar