Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:40:00.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genotypic and environmental effects on curd weight of autumn-maturing cauliflowers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

P. Crisp  and
V. Kesavan
P. Crisp
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick, UK
V. Kesavan
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Twelve genotypes of cauliflower were grown in two seasons from six seedling propagation treatments in three sequential sowings. There was a high genotypic component of variation for curd weight, indicating that this character can be improved by breeding. A large genotype × environment interaction included genotypic differences in stability to the environment, notably in the self-compatible genotypes. Mean curd weight and stability of genotypes to the environment for this trait were uncorrelated, indicating that high weight and high stability could be bred into a single variety.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 90 , Issue 1 , February 1978 , pp. 11 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Crisp, P. (1977). Breeding strategy for winter cauliflowers in south west Britain. Journal of Horticultural Science 52, 347–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
E. E. C. (1972). European Economic Community Standards for Fresh Cauliflowers. Issued by Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, MAFF (Publications), Pinner, Middlesex, UK.Google Scholar
Fripp, , Yvonne, , & Caten, C. E. (1971). Genotypeenvironment interactions in Schizophyllum commune. I. Analysis and character. Heredity 27, 393–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, A. E. & Crisp, P. (1977). Breeding system, taxonomy, and breeding strategy in cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.). Euphytica 26, 369–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kesavan, V., Crisp, P., Gray, A. R. & Dowker, B. D. (1976). Genotypic and environmental effects on the maturity time of autumn cauliflowers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 47, 133–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumaran, N. M. (1971). Studies on combining ability, gene effects and heterosis in cauliflower. Ph.D. thesis, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
Perkins, Jean M. & Jinks, J. L. (1973). The assessment and specificity of environmental and genotypeenvironmental components of variability. Heredity 30, 111–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salter, P. J. & James, Janet (1975). The effect of plant density on the initiation, growth and maturity of curds of two cauliflower varieties. Journal of Horticultural Science 50, 239–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffé, H. (1959). The Analysis of Variance. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Swarup, V. & Pal, A. B. (1966). Gene effects and heterosis in cauliflower: I. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 26, 269–81.Google Scholar