Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:50:12.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic variation amongst swede varieties and their hybrids and their response to soil fertility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

O. A. Denton  and
W. J. Whittington
O. A. Denton
Affiliation:
Nottingham University School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leica.
W. J. Whittington
Affiliation:
Nottingham University School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leica.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The mean total yield and mean fresh weight of seven swede varieties and their F1 hybrids was increased primarily by nitrogen and also by phosphorus fertilizer. There was no evidence of genotype × environment interaction for characters concerned with yield except for dry-matter content where two varieties, Best-of-All and Reform, were less stable to fertility environments than the others. Heterosis was common amongst F1 hybrids and this suggests their use in swede improvement: the inheritance pattern of root weight showed overdominance, shoot weight showed partial dominance and drymatter content showed additivity, with no evidence of gene interaction. Segregation for root fresh weight and dry-matter content occurred in F2 populations and although an overall negative correlation was found there was evidence that progeny from certain crosses gave reasonable prospects of combining both characters.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 87 , Issue 2 , October 1976 , pp. 443 - 446
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Denton, O. A. & Whittington, W. J. (1975). The response of swede varieties and their hybrids to soil pH. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 85, 395–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finlay, K. W. & Wilkinson, G. N. (1963). The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14, 742–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frandsen, K. J. (1958). Breeding of swede (B. napusvar. rapifera L.) In Handbuch der Pflanzenzüchtung (ed. Roemer, T. and Rudorf, W.), 2nd ed., vol. 3, pp. 311–26. Berlin: Paul Parey.Google Scholar
Hayman, B. I. (1954). The theory and analysis of diallel orosses. Genetics 39, 689–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jinks, J. L. (1954). The analysis of continuous variation in a diallel cross of Nicotiana ruslica varieties. Genetics 39, 767–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNaughton, I. H. & Munro, I. K. (1972). Heterosis and its possible exploitation in swedes (Brassica napus L. spp. rapifera). Euphylica 21, 518–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar