Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T17:14:46.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Game domestication for animal production in Kenya: the nutritional ecology of oryx, zebu cattle and sheep under free-range conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. R. Stanley Price
M. R. Stanley Price
Affiliation:
African Wildlife Foundation of Washington, D. C., P. O. Box 48177, Nairobi, Kenya
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Observations on oryx, sheep and cattle under natural grazing conditions in both a wet and a dry season are given and discussed.

Dry faecal outputs by the sheep and oryx were less in the wet than in the dry season. Output by the cattle was greater than both, and showed little seasonal difference. Faecal nitrogen concentrations showed no interspecific overlap, in the rank order sheep > oryx > cattle. All were greater in the wet season, and the rank order maintained.

Drinking water intakes were similar for oryx and sheep in both seasons. The cattle's water intake was greater in the wet season. Expressed as ml/kg W0·85/day, there were no overlaps in species' mean intakes, in the order cattle > sheep > oryx, in the ratio 100:57:24. In the dry season, the herd walked 16 km on non-drinking days, and a further 7 km on alternate days when receiving water. Under wetter conditions with more forage available, the herd walked only 11 km daily.

Slight interspecific differences in the times spent walking, feeding, standing and lying were found over a 48 h period. In the wet season less time was spent walking and feeding, with corresponding increases in the other activities. The oryx were notable in that rumination occupied far less of their daytime activity than for the sheep or cattle although the total times spent ruminating were similar.

The results are discussed in relation to differences in the species’ feeding habits and strategies of diet selection, combining the grazing results with observations from penned animals on a common diet. The intakes of water agree with the results from penned animals, confirming oryx's adaptation to hot, dry conditions. The advantages of a low water requirement, met by intermittent drinking, are discussed.

The possible detrimental effects on productivity of a regime of day-grazing and night-penning under hot conditions are discussed. In the light of these, some advantages to oryx of scheduling its rumination to the night hours are suggested.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 104 , Issue 2 , April 1985 , pp. 375 - 382
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, G. W. & Dudzinski, M. L. (1967). Comparison of faecal nitrogen regressions and in vitro estimates of diet digestibility for estimating the consumption of herbage by grazing animals. Journal of AgriculturalScience, Cambridge 68, 213–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudzinski, M. L. & Arnold, G. W. (1973). Comparisons of diets of sheep and cattle grazing together on sown pastures on the southern tablelands of New South Wales by principal components analysis. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 24, 899–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, C. R. (1975). Climate and the food habits of ungulates on Galana Ranch. East African Wildlife Journal 13, 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. M. (1979). Game domestication for animal production in Kenya: field studies of the body-water turnover of game and livestock. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93, 71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. M. & Heath, B. R. (1975). Game domestication for animal production in Africa. World Animal Review 16, 1–8.Google Scholar
King, J. M., Heath, B. R. & Hill, R. E. (1977). Game domestication for animal production in Kenya: theory and practice. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 89, 445–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. M., Kingaby, G. P., Colvin, J. G. & Heath, B. R. (1975). Seasonal variation in water turnover by oryx and eland on the Galana Game Ranch Research Project. East African Wildlife Journal 13, 287–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreulen, D. (1975). Wildebeest habitat selection on the Serengeti plains, Tanzania, in relation to calcium and lactation: a preliminary report. East African Wildlife Journal 13, 297–304.Google Scholar
Ledger, H. P. (1977). The utilization of dietary energy by steers during periods of restricted food intake and subsequent realimentation. 2. The comparative energy requirements of penned and exercised steers for long term maintenance at constant live weight. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88, 27–33.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. G. (1977). Game domestication for animal production in Kenya: activity patterns of eland, oryx, buffalo and zebu cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 89, 551–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. G. (1978). Game domestication for animal production in Kenya: shade behaviour and factors affecting the herding of eland, oryx, buffalo and zebu cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90, 587–596.Google Scholar
Pearce, G. R., Vercoe, J. E. & Freer, M. (1962). The establishment of faecal nitrogen - digestibility regressions for animals grazing irrigated pasture. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 59, 397–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, G. R., Vercoe, J. E. & Tribe, D. E. (1962). The estimation of the intake of grazing sheep. 2. Application of faecal nitrogen regressions to a group of grazing sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 59, 349–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellew, R. A. (1984). Food consumption and energy budgets of the giraffe. Journal of Applied Ecology 21, 141–159.Google Scholar
Pennycuick, L. (1975). Movements of the migratory wildebeest population in the Serengeti area between 1960 and 1973. East African Wildlife Journal 13, 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, W. A. (1974). Preliminary studies into bush utilization by cattle in Zambia. Journal of Applied Ecology 11, 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertshaw, D. & Finch, V. A. (1976). The effects of climate on the productivity of beef cattle. In Beef Cattle Production in Developing Countries (ed. Smith, D. J.), pp. 281–293. Centre for Tropical Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. (1969). Biometry: the Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 776 pp. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman & Co.Google Scholar
Squires, V. R. & Wilson, A. D. (1971). Distance between food and water supply and its effect on drinking frequency, and food and water intake of Merino and Border Leicester sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 22, 283–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley Price, M. R. (1977). The estimation of food intake, and its seasonal variation, in the hartebeest. East African Wildlife Journal 15, 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley Price, M. R. (1978). The nutritional ecology of Coke's hartebeest (Alcelaphus buselaphus cokei) in Kenya. Journal of Applied Ecology 15, 33–49.Google Scholar
Stanley Price, M. R. (1985). Game domestication for animal production in Kenya: feeding trials with oryx, zebu cattle and sheep under controlled conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 104, 367–374.Google Scholar
Vercoe, J. E., Pearce, G. R. & Tribe, D. E. (1962). The estimation of the intake of grazing sheep. 1. Establishment of faecal nitrogen regressions. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 59, 343–347.Google Scholar
Webster, A. J. F. (1972). Act of eating and its relation to the heat increment of feed in ruminants. International Symposium on Environmental Physiology: Bioenergetics, pp. 42–48. Federated American Societies for Experimental Biology.Google Scholar
Western, D. (1975). Water availability and its influence on the structure and dynamics of a savannah large mammal community. East African Wildlife Journal 13, 265–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar