Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:43:17.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Field studies on 14C assimilate fixation and movement in oil-seed rape (B. napus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. F. Chapman ,
R. W. Daniels  and
D. H. Scarisbrick
J. F. Chapman
Affiliation:
Wye College (University of London), Ashford, Kent, TN25 5AH
R. W. Daniels
Affiliation:
Wye College (University of London), Ashford, Kent, TN25 5AH
D. H. Scarisbrick
Affiliation:
Wye College (University of London), Ashford, Kent, TN25 5AH
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The roles of leaves, stems and reproductive parts in 14CO2 fixation and its subsequent movement in winter oil-seed rape, cultivar Jet Neuf, were investigated in two field experiments carried out on the Wye College Farm. The relative importance of these organs changed with time. At early flowering the leaves were the most important photosynthetic organs (66·8% 14CO2 activity). Midway between flowering and maturity the stems became the major supplier of photosynthates, a role eventually taken over by the developing siliquae (pods).

These data stress the importance of keeping all photosynthetically active surfaces free from disease if efficient resource utilization and higher yields are to be achieved.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 102 , Issue 1 , February 1984 , pp. 23 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brar, G. & Thies, W. (1977). Contribution of leaves, stem, siliques and seed to dry matter accumulation in ripening seeds of rapeseed Brassica napus L. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenphysiologie 82, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, J. F. (1982). Chemical growth regulator studies on oil seed rape (Brassica napus L.). Ph.D. thesis, Wye College, University of London, Ashford, Kent.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. F., Scarisbbick, D. H. & Daniels, R. W. (1983). The effect of Terpal on the yield and yield components of oil-seed rape (Brassica napus L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 100, 745–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clabke, J. M. (1979). Intra plant variation in number of seeds per pod, seed weight in Brassica napus cv. Tower. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 59, 959–962.Google Scholar
Clabke, J. M. & Simpson, G. M. (1978). Growth stage analysis of Brassica napus cv. Tower. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 58, 587–595.Google Scholar
Daniels, R. W., Soabisbbick, D. H., Mahamtjd, B. S., Chapman, J. F. & Addo-Quaye, A. (1982). Oilseed rape physiology. In Yield of Cereals Course Papers. National Agricultural Centre.Google Scholar
Fbeyman, S., Chabnetski, W. A. & Cbookston, R. K. (1973). Role of leaves in the formation of seed in rape. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 53, 693–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habpeb, F. R. & Bebkenkamp, B. (1975). Revised growth stage key for Brassica campestris and B. napus. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 55, 657–658.Google Scholar
Inanaga, S., Kumura, A. & Murata, Y. (1979). Photosynthesis and yield of rape seed. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly 13, 169–175.Google Scholar
Krogman, K. K. & Hobbs, E. H. (1975). Yield and morphological response of rape (Brassica campestris L. cv. Span) to irrigation and fertilizer treatments. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 55, 903–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Major, D. J. (1977). Analysis of growth of irrigated rape. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 57, 193–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Major, D. J., Bole, J. B. & Charnetski, W. A. (1978). 14CO2 assimilation by stem, leaves and pods of rape plants. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 58, 783–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Major, D. J. & Charnetski, W. A. (1976). Distribution of 14C-labelled assimilates in rape plants. Crop Science 16, 530–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendham, N. J. & Scott, R. K. (1975). The limiting effect of plant size at inflorescence initiation on subsequent growth and yield of oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 84, 487–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendham, N. J., Shipway, P. A. & Scott, R. K. (1981). The effects of delayed sowing and weather on growth, development and yield of winter oil-seed rape (Brassica napus). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 389–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tayo, T. O. & Morgan, D. G. (1975). Quantitative analysis of growth, development and distribution of flowers and pods in oil-seed rape (Brassica napus L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 85, 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, B. A. & Austin, R. B. (1977). An instrument for measuring the transmission of shortwave radiation by crop canopies. Journal of Applied Ecology 14, 987–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar