Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:23:22.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Field drainage experiments and design on former opencast coal mining land

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. Scullion  and
A. R. A. Mohammed
J. Scullion
Affiliation:
University College of Wales Field Laboratory, 23 Plasgivyn Road, Penygroes, Llanelli, Dyfed
A. R. A. Mohammed
Affiliation:
University College of Wales Field Laboratory, 23 Plasgivyn Road, Penygroes, Llanelli, Dyfed
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A series of drainage trials was set up to investigate various aspects of drainage design on former opencast coal mining land. The drainage problem was characterized. Subsoiling, subsoiling direction with respect to slope and drain spacing were assessed as factors affecting drainage performance. The persistence of subsoiling effectiveness was also monitored. Drainage performances were evaluated statistically (Scullion, Mohammed & Ramshaw, 1986).

Surface wetness was the predominant feature of drainage conditions on opencast land and the effectiveness of drainage treatments was limited to the control of this superficial water. Secondary drainage, in this case subsoiling, was found to be an essential feature of field drainage, reducing surface wetness and runoff. The effectiveness of subsoiling was dependent on there being sufficient gradient (4–5%) along channels for intercepted water to clear. For this reason, adoption of appropriate minimum reinstatement gradients and the arrangement of field drains to accommodate preferred directions of secondary treatments would assist drainage effectiveness.

There was a gradual deterioration in drainage performance as spacing increased. Spacings in the range 20–30 m appeared to offer a reasonable compromise between cost and benefit. The persistence of subsoiling treatments, which deteriorated markedly after 2–4 years, was not affected by drain spacing. Performance at the widest spacings tested was, however, generally poor regardless of time since subsoiling.

A basis for calculating design rates on individual sites and the implications for drainage theory of soil air-water interactions are briefly considered.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 107 , Issue 3 , December 1986 , pp. 521 - 528
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bragg, N. C. (1982). Land drainage and restoration of land after NCB opencast mining. Soil and Water 10 (2) 13–15.Google Scholar
Bragg, N. C. (1983). Restoring land to agriculture. Soil and Water 11 (4), 21–23.Google Scholar
Bragg, N. C., Griffith, C., Jones, A. & Bell, S. (1982). A study of the problems and implications of land drainage on reinstated opencast coal sites. Report of the North of England Soils Discussion Group, 09.Google Scholar
Brook, D. S. & Bates, F. (1960). Grassland in the restoration of opencast sites. Journal of the British Grassland Society 15, 116–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, J. (1957). Problems of land reclamation. 4. Opencast coal sites. Agricultural Review 2, 30–35.Google Scholar
Bunting, J. F. (1978). Land drainage in the restoration of opencast coal sites in the East Midlands. ADAS Qtiarterly Review 30, 132–138.Google Scholar
Childs, E. C. (1940). A recording water-flow meter. Journal of Scientific Instruments 17, 93–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, E. C. & Youngs, E. (1958). The use of moisture characteristic curves in assessing the stability of opencast coal sites. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Soil Structure Ghent, pp. 415–421.Google Scholar
Collinson, L. E. (1967). Land reclamation in Northumberland after opencast coal. Agriculture London 74 (10), 489–494.Google Scholar
Davies, C. (1973). Soil restoration after industrial exploitation. In Aspects of Current Use and Misuse of Soil Resources. Welsh Soils Discussion Group 10, pp. 109–115.Google Scholar
Davison, D. J. (1971). Restoration and reclamation of opencast sites. Colliery Guardian 219, 94–102.Google Scholar
Fitton, A., Gibbons, J., Precious, G., Webber, J. & Theobald, G. H. (1958). Experiments on the rehabilitation of opencast coal sites. Experimental Husbandry 4, 58–73.Google Scholar
Hunter, F. (1953). Opencast coal sites reclaimed. Agriculture London 60, 335–336.Google Scholar
McGowan, M. (1984). Soil water regimes of soils developed on Keuper Marl. Journal of Soil Science 35, 317–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natural Environment Research Council (1975). Flood Studies Report, Vol 2 and 5 (ed. Suteliffe, J. V.), Natural Environmental Research Council, Institute of Hydrology.Google Scholar
Piper, C. J. (1950). Soil and Plant Analysis. Adelaide: University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
Pringle, J. (1958). Opencast coal mining; the restoration problem. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Soil Structure Ghent, pp. 64–72.Google Scholar
Scullion, J. (1984). The assessment of experimental techniques developed to assist the rehabilitation of restored opencast coal mining land. Ph.D. thesis, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth.Google Scholar
Scullion, J., Mohammed, A. R. A. & Kamshaw, G. A. (1986). Statistical evaluation of drainage treatments in simple field trials with special reference to former opencast coal mining land. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107, 515–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spoor, G., Leeds-Harrison, P. B. & Goodwin, R. J. (1982). Some fundamental aspects of the formation, stability and failure of mole drainage channels. Journal of Soil Science 33, 411–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, V. I. & Adams, W. A. (1968). The quantitative description of soil moisture states in natural habitats with special reference to moist soils. In The Measurement of Environmental Factors in Terrestrial Ecology (ed. Wadsworth, R. M.), pp. 161–173. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Trafford, B. D. (1975 a). Drainage experiments and drainage design. In Soil Conditions and Crop Production, pp. 417–433. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Trafford, B. D. (1975 b). Improving the design of practical field drainage. Soil Science 119, 334–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trafford, B. D. & Twocock, J. G. (1972). The drainage experiment on Radar opencast coal site. Field Drainage Experimental Unit Technical Bulletin 72/16.Google Scholar
Youngs, E. G. (1983). The contribution of physios to land drainage. Journal of Soil Science 34, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar