Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T00:59:41.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Factors affecting the loss of yield of sugar beet caused by beet yellows virus: I. Rate and date of infection; date of sowing and harvesting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Marion A. Watson
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden
D. J. Watson
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden
R. Hull
Affiliation:
Midland Agricultural College, Sutton Bonington

Extract

Field experiments were carried out to measure the effect on the yield and composition of sugar beet of infection with beet yellows virus, and to determine how the effect varies with rate and date of infection and with date of sowing and harvesting of the crop.

Control measures designed to prevent spread of infection within experimentally infected plots and introduction of infection from sources outside the experiment, were not completely effective. Consequently the numbers of plants which became infected differed from those prescribed by the experimental treatments. The effects of infection were, therefore, estimated by means of regressions on the numbers of plants observed to become infected on successive dates.

After correcting the observed yields for accidental infections by means of the regression coefficients, it was found that the effect of infection on the yield of sugar was linearly related to the rate of infection, i.e. the loss of yield of sugar caused by infection was proportional to the percentage of infected plants. There was no compensation for loss in infected plants by increased growth of healthy neighbours.

The effect of infection on yield of sugar decreased linearly with later date of infection, falling to values not significantly different from zero at the date of harvest. The loss of yield caused by infection was therefore approximately proportional to the interval of time between the date of infection, as shown by the appearance of symptoms, and the date of harvest.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1946

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Watson, D. J. & Baptiste, E. C. D. (1938). Ann. Bot., Lond., N.S. 2, 437–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, M. A. (1942). Ann. Appl. Biol. 29, 358–65.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. R. (1946). Bull. Ent. Res. 37 (in the Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, F. (1937). Tech. Commun. Bur. Soil Sct., Harpenden, no. 35.Google Scholar