Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:24:22.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experiments on the nutrition of the dairy heifer

X. Effect on nitrogen utilization for growth of chemical and physical treatment of the principal source of protein in the diet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

W. H. Broster ,
T. Smith ,
Valerie J. Broster  and
J. W. Siviter
W. H. Broster
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, England
T. Smith
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, England
Valerie J. Broster
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, England
J. W. Siviter
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Eight experiments, comprising four randomized-block feeding trials each with 20–45 animals and four changeover-design nitrogen (N) balance trials each with 6–10 animals, were used to study the effect of the addition of formaldehyde to fishmeal and to casein, of severe heating of fishmeal, and of tannin treatment of a mixture of vegetable protein-rich foods on the utilization of N for growth. Added in moderate amounts to rations demonstrated within the experiments to be deficient in N, quantities, but not the preparations, of N in the diet were critical to growth save at very low N intakes when the untreated foodstuffs were used more efficiently. Additional energy given in isonitrogenous rations increased growth, reducing N losses in the urine.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 90 , Issue 2 , April 1978 , pp. 299 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Annison, E. F. (1972). Rumen metabolism and protected nutrients. University of Nottingham Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers 6 (ed. Swan, H. and Lewis, D.), pp. 2–21. London: J. & A. Churchill.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. G. & Hutton, K. (1975). Fate of nitrogenous compounds entering the small intestine. In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant (ed. McDonald, I. W. and Warner, A. C. I.), pp. 432–47. Armidale: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Barry, T. N. (1976). The effectiveness of formaldehyde treatment in protecting dietary protein from rumen microbial degradation. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 35, 221–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broster, W. H. (1973). Protein-energy interrelationships in growth and lactation of cattle and sheep. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 32, 115–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broster, W. H. & Oldham, J. D. (1977). Protein quantity and quality for the U.K. dairy cow. In Nutrition and the Climatic Environment, (ed. Haresign, W., Swan, H. and Lewis, D.), pp. 123–53. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H. & Smith, T. (1967). Nutrition of the growing heifer: protein requirements, white fishmeal versus decorticated groundnut meal. Report of the National Institute for Research in Dairying, 44–5.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H., Sutton, J. D., Bines, J. A., Smith, T., Porter, J. W. G., Smith, R. H., Ford, J. E., McAllan, A. P., Rolls, B. A. & Broster, V. J. (1969–1970). Protein utilization by ruminants. Report of the National Institute for Research in Dairying, 88–9.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H., Tuck, V. J., Smith, T. & Johnson, V. J. (1969). Experiments on the nutrition of the dairy heifer, vii. Observations on the effect of energy intake on the utilization of protein for growth and lactation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 72, 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, P. L. & Nicholson, J. W. G. (1973). Formaldehyde treatment of rapeseed meal for lactating dairy cows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 53, 765A.Google Scholar
Burroughs, W., Nelson, D. K. & Mertens, D. R. (1975). Evaluation of protein nutrition by metabolizable protein and urea fermentation potential. Journal of Dairy Science 58, 611–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cochran, W. G. & Cox, G. M. (1957). Experimental designs. 2nd Edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (1967). Method and food composition for feeding ruminants. Patent specification 1137214.Google Scholar
Cuthbertson, D. P. & Chalmers, M. I. (1950). Utilization of casein supplement administered to ewes by ruminal and duodenal fistulae. Biochemical Journal 46, XVII–III.Google Scholar
Elliott, R. C., Reed, W. D. C. & Topps, J. H. (1964). Studies of protein requirements of ruminants. British Journal of Nutrition 18, 519–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faichney, G. J. (1972). Digestion by sheep of concentrate diets containing formaldehyde treated peanut meal. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 859–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faichney, G. J. & Davies, H. Lloyd, (1972). The effect of formaldehyde treatment of peanut meal in concentrate diets on the performance of calves. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 167–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faichney, G. J. & Davies, H. Lloyd (1973). The performance of calves given concentrate diets treated with formaldehyde. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 24, 613–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faichney, G. J. & Weston, R. H. (1971). Digestion by ruminant lambs of a diet containing formaldehyde treated casein. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 22, 461–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, K. A. (1975). The protection of dietary proteins and amino acids against microbial fermentation in the rumen. In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant. Proceedings IV International Symposium on Rumen Physiology, Sydney, Australia (ed. McDonald, I. W. and Warner, A. C. I.), pp. 448–64. Armidale: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Ferguson, K. A., Hemsley, J. A. & Reis, P. J. (1967). Nutrition and wool growth. The effect of protecting dietary protein from microbial degradation in the rumen. Australian Journal of Science 30, 215–17.Google Scholar
Ford, J. E. (1960). A microbial method for assessing the nutritional value of proteins. British Journal of Nutrition 14, 485–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, J. E. (1962). A microbial method for assessing the nutritional value of proteins. 2. The measurement of ‘available’ methionine, leucine, isoleucine, arginine, histidine, tryptophan and valine. British Journal of Nutrition 16, 409–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, J. E. (1964). A microbial method for assessing the nutritional value of proteins. 3. Further studies on the measurement of available amino acids. British Journal of Nutrition 18, 449–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goering, H. K. & Waldo, D. R. (1974). Processing effects on protein utilization by ruminants. Proceedings of Cornell Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers, 25–36.Google Scholar
Hutton, K. & Annison, E. F. (1972). Control of nitrogen metabolism in the ruminant. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 31, 151–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leroy, Francoise & Zelter, S. Z. (1970). Protection des proteines alimentaires contre la déamination bacterienne au niveau du rumen. II. Études ‘in vivo’ sur moutons fistules. Annales de Biologie Animate Biochimie, Biophysique 10, 401–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, E. L. (1973). Evaluation of foods as sources of nitrogen and amino acids. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 32, 79–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ørskov, E. R. (1970). Nitrogen utilization by the young ruminant. Proceedings 4th Conference for Feed Manufacturers, University of Nottingham (ed. Swan, H. & Lewis, D.) pp. 20–43. London: J. & A. Churchill.Google Scholar
Ørsko, E. R. (1976). Factors influencing protein and non-protein nitrogen utilization in young ruminants. E.A.A.P. Publication 16. Protein Metabolism and Nutrition (ed. Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 457–76. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Phillipson, A. T. (1972). The protection of dietary components from rumen fermentations. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 31, 159–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Satter, L. D. & Roffler, R. E. (1975). Nitrogen requirement and utilization in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 58, 1219–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, S. P., Jorgensen, N. A., Benevenga, N. J. & Brttmgardt, V. H. (1973). Comparison of soybean meal, formaldehyde treated soybean meal, urea and starea for steers. Journal of Animal Science 37, 1233–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, H. R., Ingalls, J. R. & McKirdy, J. A. (1972). Nutritive value of formaldehyde treated rapeseed meal for dairy calves. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 52, 363–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. H. (1969). Reviews of the progress of dairy science: nitrogen metabolism and the rumen. Journal of Dairy Research 36, 313–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T. (1977). Utilization of poor quality forages by yearling dairy heifers. Thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. D. (1975). Energy supply from the digestive tract of cattle. In Principles of Cattle Production, (ed. Swan, H. and Broster, W. H.), pp. 121–44. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Whitelaw, F. G. & Preston, T. R. (1963). The nutrition of the early-weaned calf. III. Protein solubility and amino acid composition as factors affecting protein utilization. Animal Production 5, 131–45.Google Scholar
Whitelaw, F. G., Preston, T. R. & Dawson, G. S. (1961). The nutrition of the early-weaned calf. II. A comparison of commercial groundnut meal, heat treated groundnut meal and fishmeal as the major protein source in the diet. Animal Production 3, 127–33.Google Scholar
Williams, A. P., McAllan, A. B. & Smith, R. H. (1973). Metabolism of casein in the rumen and some effects of formaldehyde treatment. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 32, 85A.Google ScholarPubMed
Williams, A. P. & Smith, R. H. (1976). Nitrogen metabolism in calves. Effect of giving different amounts of dietary casein with and without formaldehyde treatment. British Journal of Nutrition 36, 199–209.Google ScholarPubMed
Yates, F. (1936). Incomplete randomized blocks. Annals of Eugenics 7, 121–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelter, S. Z., Delort-Laval, J. & LeRoy, F. (1969). Effet du tannage sur l'emcacité nutritive des proteines alimentaires chez le ruminant. Paper presented to European Association for Animal Production, Commission de nutrition, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Zelter, S. Z., LeRoy, F. & Tissier, J. P. (1970). Protection des proteines alimentaires contre la desamination bacterienne dans le rumen. I. Études in vitro. Annales de Biologie Animale, Biochimie, Biophysique 10, 111–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar