Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:30:09.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experiments on the effects of phosphate applied to a Buganda soil: III. A chemical study of the soil phosphate, the fate of fertilizer phosphate and the relationship with iron and aluminium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

P. H. Le Mare
Affiliation:
Cotton Research Corporation, Cotton Research Station, Namulonge, Uganda*

Summary

Solubility products (pKsp) for iron and aluminium hydroxides and phosphates have been determined in a Buganda acid clay loam. Significantly greater values, i.e. lower solubility products occurred when determined at a soil:solution ratio of 0·4 than at 0–8. In the most acid soils, pH 4·8–5·0, values of pKsp) were consistent with the possibility that iron and aluminium concentrations were controlled by goethite and gibbsite. Above pH 5 the data indicated that these minerals were not effective. The maximum pKsp) value for iron phosphate was too small to be consistent with that for strengite, indicating that this mineral did not affect phosphate concentration in the soil; the maximum value for aluminium phosphate was consistent with that for variscite but the occurrence of this mineral cannot be deduced from the data. Triple superphosphate applied at 8 cwt per acre or less was converted within 2 years to a very insoluble form, having a solubility similar to that of variscite; with 16 cwt per acre the phosphate concentration was much greater than with the smaller dressings after this period and the soils appeared supersaturated with variscite.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aslyng, H. C. (1954). The lime and phosphate potentials of soils; the solubility and availability of phosphates. Yb. R. vet. agrie. Coll., Copenhagen, pp. 150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bache, B. W. (1963). Aluminium and iron phosphate studies relating to soils. I. Solution and hydrolysis of varisoite and strengite. J. Soil Sci. 14, 113123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bache, B. W. (1964). Aluminium and iron phosphate studies relating to soils. II. Reactions between phosphate and hydrous oxides. J. Soil Sci. 15, 110–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakravarti, S. N. & Talibudeen, O. (1962). Phosphate equilibria in acid soils. J. Soil Sci. 13, 231–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Mare, P. H. (1968a). Experiments on the effects of phosphate in a Buganda soil. I. Pot experiments on the response curve. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 70, 265–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Mare, P. H. (1968b). Experiments on the effects of phosphate in a Buganda soil. II. Field experiments on the response curve to superphosphate. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 70, 271–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, W. L. & Moreno, E. C. (1960). Phosphate phase equilibria in soils. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 24, 177–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, W. L., Peech, M. & Clark, J. S. (1959). Solubility criteria for the existence of variscite in soils. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 23, 357–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillén, L. G. (1959). Quantitative studies of hydrolytic equilibria. Q. Rev. chem. Soc. 13, 146–68.Google Scholar
Watanabe, F. S. & Olsen, S. R. (1962). Colorimetric determinations of phosphorus in water extracts of soil. Soil Sci. 93, 183–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, B. C. & Peech, M. (1960). Characterisation of phosphate reaction products in acid soils by the application of solubility criteria. Soil Sci. 90, 32–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar