Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T12:15:25.984Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evidence of gene-controlled sterility in bulls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. P. Donald  and
J. L. Hancock
H. P. Donald
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council's Animal Breeding Research Organization, Edinburgh, and Unit of Animal Reproduction, School of Agriculture, Cambridge
J. L. Hancock
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council's Animal Breeding Research Organization, Edinburgh, and Unit of Animal Reproduction, School of Agriculture, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A study has been made of the relationships of sterile Friesian bulls manifesting ‘knobbed’ spermatozoa, and the conclusion drawn that the characteristic defect of the acrosome is due to an autosomal sexlimited recessive gene (kn).

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , April 1953 , pp. 178 - 181
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blom, E. (1948). Medlembsbl. danske Dyrlaegeforen. 31, 446.Google Scholar
Bridges, C. B. (1916). Genetics, 1, 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryson, V. (1944). J. Morph. 74, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, L. C. (1937). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., Wash., 23, 474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, L. C. & Gluecksohn-Schoemheimer, S. (1943). Genetics, 28, 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksson, K. (1943). Hereditary Forms of Sterility in Cattle. Lund.Google Scholar
Friesland Animal Health Service (1943). 24th Ann. Rep. Leeuwarden, p. 19.Google Scholar
Gregory, P. W., Mead, S. W., Regan, W. M. & Rollins, W. C. (1951). J. Dairy Sci. 34, 1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, J. L. (1949). Vet. Rec. 61, 308.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. L. (1953). J. Exp. Biol. (in the Press).Google Scholar
Lush, J. L. (1945). Animal Breeding Plans, 3rd ed.Ames: Iowa Collegiate Press.Google Scholar
Rajasekarasetty, M. R. (1951). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol., N.Y., 78, 845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rollinson, D. H. L. & Makinson, J. B. (1949). Vet. Rec. 61, 373.Google Scholar
Rothschild, Lord (1950). J. Agric. Sci. 40, 82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrader, F. & Leuchtenberger, C. (1951). Chromosoma, 4, 404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slizynska, H. & Slizynski, B. M. (1953). J. Agric. Sci. (in the Press).Google Scholar
Stern, C. & Hadorn, E. (1938). Amer. Nat. 72, 42.Google Scholar
Tanabe, T. Y. & Casida, L. E. (1949). J. Dairy Sci. 32, 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teunissen, G. H. B. (1946). Tijdschr. Diergeneesk. 71, 292.Google Scholar