Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:17:40.038Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of protein quality of poultry feedingstuffs. 3. Expeller-processed oilseed cakes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. S. Zombade ,
G. N. Lodhi  and
J. S. Ichhponani
S. S. Zombade
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141004, India
G. N. Lodhi
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141004, India
J. S. Ichhponani
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141004, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A study was made to evaluate the protein quality of groundnut cake (GN), mustard cake (MS) and cottonseed cake (CS) and to find a suitable laboratory test for predicting the protein quality of these cakes for chicks. Different oilseed cakes varied considerably in their crude protein, true protein and crude fibre content. The nitrogen solubility was higher in GN (87·7%) followed by MS (78·7%) and CS (60·9%). A similar trend was evident with regard to in vitro protein digestibility. The GN protein was, however, lower in available lysine (2·54%) than MS (3·97%) or CS (3·19%). The albumin, globulin, prolamin and glutelin fractions accounted for 74·1, 57·0 and 48·0% in GN, MS and CS, respectively. The nitrogen solubility, globulin content and modified relative nutritive value (RNV) correlated (P < 0·05) with gross protein value (GPV). The accuracy and precision of various regression equations for predicting the quality of protein in GN, MS and CS are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 94 , Issue 1 , February 1980 , pp. 117 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1965). Official Methods of Analysis, 10th ed. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Bender, A. E. (1954). Eecent work on proteins, with special reference to peptide biosynthesis and nutritive value. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 5, 305–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, V. H. (1971). Problems in determination of FDNB-available lysine. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 22, 658–666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyne, A. W., Carpenter, K. J. & Woodham, A. A. (1961). Progress report on an assessment of laboratory procedures suggested as indicator of protein quality in feedingstuffs. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 12, 832–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busson, F., Carbiener, R., Georgbst, A., Lanza, J. & Dubois, H. (1960). Influence of variety and ecology on amino acid composition of plants (edible leguminous seeds). Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews 30, 1222.Google Scholar
Carpenter, K. J. (1960). The estimation of the available lysine in animal-protein foods. Biochemical Journal 77, 604–610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chopra, A. K. & Sidhu, G. S. (1967 a). Nutritive value of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea). 1. Amino acid composition of different varieties of groundnut grown in the Punjab. British Journal of Nutrition 21, 519–525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chopra, A. K. & Sidhu, G. S. (1976 b). Nutritive value of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea). 2. Biological evaluation of different varieties of groundnut grown in the Punjab. British Journal of Nutrition 21, 583–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cilly, V. K., Lodhi, G. N. & Ichhponani, J. S. (1978). Nutritive value of mustard cake derived from seeds of different genetic make up for growing chicks. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 543–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clegg, K. M. (1956). The application of the anthrone reagent to the estimation of starch in cereals. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 7, 40–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagkir, N. J., Ayyash, B. & Pellett, P. L. (1969). Evaluation of groundnut meal protein for poultry. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 20, 349–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damaty, S. & Hudson, B. J. F. (1975 a). A secondary interaction between gossypol and cottonseed protein. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 34, 48A.Google ScholarPubMed
Damaty, S. & Hudson, B. J. F. (1975 b). Interaction of gossypol with cottonseed protein: potentiometric studies. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 26, 1667–1672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, R. (1968). The nutritive value of groundnut protein. 2. The correlation between electrophoretio pattern and nutritive value. British Journal of Nutrition 22, 601–607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawson, R. & McIntosh, A. D. (1973). Varietal and environmental differences in the proteins of the groundnut (Arachis hypogaea). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 24, 597–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimler, R. J. (1966). Alcohol-insoluble proteins of cereal grains. Federation Proceedings 25, 1670–1675.Google ScholarPubMed
Irving, G. W. Jr, Fontaine, T. D. & Warner, R. C. (1945). Electrophoretic investigation of peanut proteins. I. Peanut meal extract, arachin and conarachin. Archives of Biochemistry 7, 475–489.Google Scholar
King, E. E. & Lamkin, G. E. (1977). Isolation of proteins from glanded cottonseed. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 25, 1211–1213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lodhi, G. N., Singh, D. & Ichhponani, J. S. (1976). Variation in nutrient content of feedingstuffs rich in protein and reassessment of the chemical method for metabolizable energy estimation for poultry. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 86, 293–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyman, C. M. (1958). Proteins. In Processed Plant Protein Foodstuffs (ed. Altschul, A. M.), pp. 13–42. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lyman, C. M., Chang, W. Y. & Couch, T. R. (1953). Evaluation of protein quality in cottonseed meals by chick growth and chemical index. Journal of Nutrition 49, 679–690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melnick, D. & Oser, B. L. (1949). The influence of heat-processing on the functional and nutritive properties of protein. Food Technology 3, 57–71.Google Scholar
Miller, D., Kifer, B. R. & Ambrose, M. E. (1970). Effect of storage on fish meal quality as evaluated by chemical indices and chick bioassay. Poultry Science 49, 1005–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, C. A. (1948). Aliens Commercial Organic Analysis, London: W. B. Churchill.Google Scholar
Neucere, N. J. (1972). Effect of heat on peanut proteins. 1. Solubility properties and immunochemical-electrophoretic modifications. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 20, 252–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, N. K. (1977). Feeding value of cottonseed cake for poultry. M.Sc. thesis, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India.Google Scholar
Sharma, N. K., Lodhi, G. N. & Ichhponani, J. S. (1978). Comparative feeding value of expellerprocessed undecorticated and decorticated cottonseed cakes for growing chicks. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 531–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, P. & Morgan, A. F. (1958). The absorption by immature and adult rats of amino acids from raw and autoclaved fresh pork. Journal of Nutrition 64, 137–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodham, A. A. & Dawson, R. (1966). The effect of heat on defatted groundnut flour. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 25, VII.Google Scholar
Woodham, A. A. & Dawson, R. (1968). The nutritive value of groundnut protein. 1. Some effects of heat upon nutritive value, protein composition and enzyme inhibitory activity. British Journal of Nutrition 22, 589–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zombade, S. S. (1977). Studies on the relationship between biological and laboratory methods of protein quality evaluation. Ph.D. thesis, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India.Google Scholar
Zombade, S. S., Lodhi, G. N. & Ichhponani, J. S. (1980 a). Evaluation of protein quality of poultry feedingstuffs. 1. Comparison of chick bioassays. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94, 105–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zombade, S. S., Lodhi, G. N. & Ichhponani, J. S. (1980 b). Evaluation of protein quality of poultry feedingstuffs. 2. Fish meal. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94, 111–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar