Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:33:41.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The evaluation of cattle foods and diets in terms of the ruminal concentration of volatile fatty acids I. The effects of level of intake, frequency of feeding, the ratio of hay to concentrates in the diet, and of supplementary feeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

I. H. Bath  and
J. A. F. Rook
I. H. Bath
Affiliation:
The National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Berkshire
J. A. F. Rook
Affiliation:
The National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Berkshire
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. A study was made of the effects of feeding regimen and the composition of the diet on the ruminal production of V.f.a.'S in cattle.

2. The day-to-day variations in the pattern of rumen fermentation in cows given a diet of hay and concentrates indicated that within-cow differences in the molar proportions of the acids from diet to diet are of significance if they exceed about 3% (of the mean value) for acetic acid, about 10% for propionic and butyric acids, and about 25% for valeric acid. The results emphasized also the important differences to be found between cows given the same diet.

3. A change in the frequency of feeding from once to four times daily at a constant daily drymatter intake had little effect on the daily mean values for pH, concentration of total V.f.a.'S, or the molar percentages of the individual acids, but almost invariably decreased the range of values observed between feeding.

4. With diets of hay and of hay and concentrates an increase in daily dry-matter intake was associated with a fall in pH and an increase in the concentration of total V.f.a.'S; with the diet of hay and concentrates there was a considerable decrease in the molar percentage of acetic acid and a corresponding increase in N-butyric, but there was little change in the molar percentages of the acids with the diet of hay.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 61 , Issue 3 , November 1963 , pp. 341 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Annison, E. F. (1954). Biochem. J. 57, 400.Google Scholar
Annison, E. F. & Lewis, D. (1959). Metabolism in the Rumen. London: Methuen and Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Armitage, E. R., Ashwokth, R. de B. & Ferguson, W. S. (1948). J. Soc. Chem. Ind. 67, 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, D. G. & Blaxter, K. L. (1957). Brit. J. Nutr. 11, 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, D. A. & Rowland, S. J. (1957). Brit. J. Nutr. 11, 288.Google Scholar
Barcroft, J., McAnally, R. A. & Phillipson, A. T. (1944). J. Exp. Biol. 20, 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campling, R. C., Freer, M. & Balch, C. C. (1963). Brit. J. Nutr. (in the Press).Google Scholar
Clegg, K. M. (1956). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 7, 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ensor, W. L., Shaw, J. C. & Tellechea, H. F. (1959). J. Dairy Sci. 42, 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairbairn, N. J. (1953). Chem. & Ind., p. 86.Google Scholar
Freer, M. & Campling, R. C. (1963). Brit. J. Nutr. 17, 79.Google Scholar
Gray, F. V. & Pilgrim, A. F. (1951). J. Exp. Biol. 28, 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, A. T. & Martin, A. J. P. (1952). Biochem. J. 50, 679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, K. L. & Ward, G. M. (1961). J. Dairy Sci. 44, 1550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAnally, R. A. & Phillipson, A. T. (1942). J. Physiol. 101, 13P.Google Scholar
Maki, L. R. (1955). Thesis, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Masson, M. J. (1951). Research, Lond., 4, 73.Google Scholar
Rook, J. A. F. & Balch, C. C. (1961). Brit. J. Nutr. 15, 361.Google Scholar
Shaw, J. C. (1961). Proc. VIIIth Int. Tierzuchtkongress Hauptberichte (Hamburg), p. 29.Google Scholar
Shaw, J. C. & Ensor, W. L. (1959). J. Dairy Sci. 42, 1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tappeiner, H. (1883). Z. Biol. 19, 228.Google Scholar
Williams, V. J. & Christian, K. R. (1956). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. A38, 403.Google Scholar