Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:20:03.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The efficiency of seedling selection by visual preference in a potato breeding programme

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. Brown ,
P. D. S. Caligari ,
G. R. Mackay  and
G. E. L. Swan
J. Brown
Affiliation:
Scottish Crop Research Institute, Pentlandfield, Roslin, Midlothian, Scotland
P. D. S. Caligari
Affiliation:
Scottish Crop Research Institute, Pentlandfield, Roslin, Midlothian, Scotland
G. R. Mackay
Affiliation:
Scottish Crop Research Institute, Pentlandfield, Roslin, Midlothian, Scotland
G. E. L. Swan
Affiliation:
Scottish Crop Research Institute, Pentlandfield, Roslin, Midlothian, Scotland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The efficiency of visual selection in a glasshouse of 1600 seedlings compared with visual selection in the field of the same clones is examined. Also the amount of agreement in assessment between four different potato breeders screening the same clones is investigated. Seedlings were grown from true seed in four-inch pots in a glasshouse and all the clones which produced tubers were grown in the field the following year. Clones which produced more than one tuber from a seedling were grown at two locations in the first clonal year. One of the sites used in the first clonal year is normally used for potato yield trials (i.e. a ware site) and the other is normally used for the production of healthy seed tubers (i.e. a seed site). In all three environments, the tubers produced from each plant were assessed by four breeders independently on a 1–9 scale of increasing attractiveness.

From the data it was found that the repeatability of assessment between the glasshouse and the first clonal year was low in that the correlation between the average preference score of the four breeders in the glasshouse and each of the two first clonal year sites accounted for only 8·24 and 6·84% of the total variation. Many clones which had low scores in the glasshouse were subsequently given high scores in the first clonal year. It was therefore concluded that selection of seedlings was not very efficient. Although, in general, the weight of the tuber that was planted greatly influenced whether a clone was selected in the first clonal year, a large number of clones which produced only small tubers in the glasshouse were subsequently selected in the first clonal year.

Within each environment the four breeders were either all selecting, or all rejecting, a much higher proportion of clones than would be expected if selection had been made completely at random. The breeders were in most agreement when assessing clones at the ‘ware’ site, and in most disagreement when assessing them grown in the glasshouse from true seed. Therefore the poor efficiency of selection of seedlings grown in the glasshouse was not, in the main, a result of a high error variance in visual assessment but rather due to poor association between the performance of seedlings and first clonal year plants.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 103 , Issue 2 , October 1984 , pp. 339 - 346
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, E. J. (1978). Plant density. In The Potato Crop (ed. Harris, P. M.), pp. 278–326. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. A. D. & Howard, H. W. (1981). Effectiveness of selection in the early stages of potato breeding. Potato Research 24, 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blonquist, A. W. (1963). First clonal generation potato progeny performance at two Minnesota locations. American Potato Journal 39, 460–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, H. T. & Johnston, G. R. (1965). Reliability of potato selection in the first clonal generation. American Potato Journal 51, 8–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holden, J. H. W. (1977). Potato breeding at Pentlandfield. In Scottish Plant Breeding Station Annual Report, pp. 66–97.Google Scholar
Howard, H. W. (1963). Some potato breeding problems. In Plant Breeding Institute, Cambridge Annual Report, pp. 6–20.Google Scholar
Kichefski, D. F., Quinn, A. A. & Peloquin, S. J. (1976). The effectiveness of selection during early clonal generations in varietal breeding American Potato Journal 53, 370–371.Google Scholar
Mackay, G. R. (1982). Breeding for resistance to pests and diseases. In Producing Quality Seed Potatoes in Scotland, Proceedings of the Scottish Society for Crop Research, Bulletin No. 1, pp. 27–36.Google Scholar
Maris, B. (1966). The modifiability of characters important in potato breeding. Euphytica 15, 18–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmonds, N. W. (1969). Prospects of potato improvement. In Scottish Plant Breeding Station Annual Report, pp. 18–38.Google Scholar