Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:22:33.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of three protein sources on the growth and feed utilization of cattle fed cassava

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. D. Tudor ,
K. R. McGuigan  and
B. W. Norton
G. D. Tudor
Affiliation:
Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Animal Research Institute, Yeerongpilly, Brisbane, 4105, Australia
K. R. McGuigan
Affiliation:
Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Animal Research Institute, Yeerongpilly, Brisbane, 4105, Australia
B. W. Norton
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, 4067, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The nutritive value of diets predominantly of dried cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz.) tubers supplemented with protein concentrates, and roughage were measured in three experiments using steers.

In Expt 1 the digestibility of diets of dried, chipped cassava tubers and tops (80:20) or rolled sorghum grain and cotton seed hulls (80:20), supplemented with 4 or 8% groundnut meal and urea, was determined. The apparent digestibility coefficients of organic matter (OM) of the cassava diets with 4 or 8 % groundnut meal (0·77 and 0·80, respectively) were significantly (P < 0·01) higher than grain diets with 4 or 8% groundnut meal (both 0·74). The digestibility of starch in the cassava diets was significantly (P < 0·01) higher than in the grain diets (1·00, 0·99, 0·94 and 0·93, respectively). There were no significant differences in the digestibility of the N component (0·62 and 0·61 v. 0·58 and 0·59, respectively). The N retained (g/day) was lower (P > 0·05) with cassava (7·8 and 6·8 v. 11·1 and 10·5, respectively) and was utilized (g/100 g apparently absorbed N) less efficiently (P > 0·05) (18 and IS v.28 and 27, respectively).

The high apparent digestibility of the cassava diet suggests that cassava could replace cereal grain in intensive finishing diets. The N retention data suggest that groundnut meal is no better than urea as a N source.

In Expt 2, 15 steers with a mean initial weight of 173 kg were individually fed pelleted diets of sorghum grain, cassava plus urea or cassava plus meat and bone meal (90 concentrate: 10 roughage). The cattle fed the grain diet ate significantly (P < 0·01) more OM (4·3 v. 3·4 kg/day), grew faster (P < 0·01) (1·21 v. 0·85 kg/day) and slightly more efficiently (P > 0·05) (3·6 v. 3·8 kg/kg) than cattle fed cassava with urea. Cattle fed cassava with meat and bone meal were intermediate between the two treatments for intake and daily gain (3·7 and 1·06 kg/day, respectively) but had the best feed conversion (3·5 kg/kg). The acetic/propionic acid ratio was similar on all three diets (1·2, 1·6 and 1·4:1, respectively), but the ratio of propionic/butyric was significantly (P < 0·01) different (5·8, 2·7 and 2·7:1, respectively).

In Expt 3, 15 other steers with mean initial weight of 195 kg were individually fed pelleted cassava diets with 0, 5 or 10% fishmeal (82 cassava: 18 roughage). The intake of OM (4·2, 4·5 and 4·7 kg/day, respectively), daily live-weight gain (0·98, 1·27 and 1·32 kg/day, respectively) and feed conversion (4·3, 3·7 and 3·7 kg/kg, respectively) were all better in cattle fed cassava with fishmeal. The proportions of volatile fatty acids in the rumen fluid were similar to that recorded in cassava fed cattle in the earlier trial.

It is concluded that cattle fed high energy diets based on dried cassava tubers can perform well. Although feed intake and daily gain of cattle fed cassava may be lower than for cattle fed grain diets, the conversion of food to live-weight gain should be similar or better.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 104 , Issue 1 , February 1985 , pp. 11 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Agbicultural Chemists (1970). Official Methods of Analysis. 10th edn.Washington, D.C.: Association of Official Agricultural Chemists.Google Scholar
Cock, J. H. (1982). Cassava: a basic energy source in the tropics. Science 218, 755–762.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coursey, D. G. & Halliday, D. (1974). Cassava as animal feed. Outlook on Agriculture 8, 10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devendra, C. (1976). Cassava as a feed source for ruminants. In Cassava as Animal Feed (ed. Nestel, B. and Graham, M.), pp. 107–119. Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Centre.Google Scholar
Duncan, D. L. (1966). The balance trial and its limitations. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition (ed. Abrams, J. T.), pp. 51–80. London: J. & A. Churchill.Google Scholar
Eadie, J. M., Hyldqaard-Jensen, J., Mann, S. O., Reid, R. S. & Whitelaw, F. G. (1970). Observations on the microbiology and biochemistry of the rumen in cattle given different quantities of a pelleted barley ration. British Journal of Nutrition 24, 157–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gartner, R. J. W. & O'Rourke, P. K. (1977). Effects of antibiotics, dried molasses distillers’ solubles and zeranol in all-sorghum grain rations fed to steers. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 17, 214–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, W. R. (1977). Mixed model least-squares and maximum likelihood computer program. Users' Guide for LSML 76. Ohio State University.Google Scholar
McCollough, H. (1967). The determination of ammonia in whole blood by a direct colourimetrio method. Clinica Chimica Acta 17, 297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macrae, J. C. & Armstrong, D. G. (1968). Enzyme method for determination of a-linked glucose polymers in biological materials. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 19, 578–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marty, R. J., Benavides, M. & Preston, T. R. (1974). Rumen fermentation in bulls fed sucrose as the main carbohydrate source. Cuban Journal of Agriculture Science 8, 157–165.Google Scholar
Meggison, P. A. (1979). Studies on nonprotein nitrogen utilization in the bovine. Ph.D. thesis, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1975). Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Technical Bulletin No. 33. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. (1970). Nitrogen utilization by the young ruminant. In Proceedings of the 4th Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers (ed. Swan, H. and Lewis, D.), pp. 20–35.Google Scholar
Pigden, W. J. & Brisson, G. J. (1956). Effect of the frequency of administration of chromic oxide on its faecal excretion pattern by grazing wethers. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Science 36, 146–155.Google Scholar
Preston, T. R. (1972). Molasses as an energy source for cattle. World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics 17, 250–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priego, A., Wilson, A. & Sutherland, T. M. (1977). The effects on parameters of rumen fermentation, rumen volume and fluid flow rate of zebu bulls given chopped sugar cane supplemented with rice polishings or cassava root meal. Tropical Animal Production 2, 292–299.Google Scholar
Ravelo, G., Fernandez, A., Bobadilla, M., Macleod, N. A., Preston, T. R. & Leng, R. A. (1978). Glucose metabolism in cattle on sugar cane based diets: a comparison of supplements of rice polishings and cassava root meal. Tropical Animal Production 3, 12–18.Google Scholar
Roffler, R. E. & Satter, L. D. (1975). Relationship between ruminal ammonia and nonprotein nitrogen utilization by ruminants. II. Application of published evidence to the development of a theoretical model for predicting nonprotein nitrogen utilization. Journal of Dairy Science 58, 1889–1898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, J. B., Bordas, F. & Preston, T. R. (1980). Protein synthesis in the rumen of bulls given differont levels of molasses and cassava root. Tropical Animal Production 5, 57–62.Google Scholar
Schneider, B. H. (1947). Feeds of the World, their Digestibility and Composition. Charleston: Jarrett Printing Co.Google Scholar
Talke, H. & Schubert, G. E. (1965). Enzymatische Harnstoffbestimmung in Blut und Serum im Optischen Test nach Warburg. Klinisches Wochenschrift 43, 174–175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tudor, G. D. (1984). Intensive beef production from dried cassava tubers. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 15, 763.Google Scholar
Williams, C. H., David, D. J. & Iismaa, O. (1962). The determination of chromic oxide in faeces samples by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 59, 381–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar