Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:56:50.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of soil drought during the generative development phase of faba bean (Vicia faba) on photosynthetic characters and biomass production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

X. Z. Xia
X. Z. Xia
Affiliation:
Xichang Agricultural College, Sichuan 615013, China
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effects of periods of drought occurring during different phases of reproductive growth of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) cv. Xichang Dabai on dry matter production, seed yield, photosynthetic rate and stomatal size were investigated in pot experiments in 1987/88 and 1988/89 at Xichang Agricultural College, China. Six treatments were imposed: no drought (control), and drought from floral initiation to first flowering (D1), from first flowering to full bloom (D2), from full bloom to initiation of podset (D3), from initiation of pod-set to full pod-set (D4), and from full pod-set to maturity (D5).

Photosynthetic rate, chlorophyll content, leaf area, stomatal pore breadth, biomass and seed yield were decreased by all drought treatments, but stomatal frequency and respiratory rate were increased. The light saturation point for photosynthesis was decreased from 950 µmol/m2/s (PAR) to 570 µmol/m2/s (PAR) in leaves from drought-stressed plants, which also showed maximum stomatal opening between 08.00 and 11.00 h followed by progressive stomatal closure.

The response of faba bean to drought varied during the different reproductive growth stages. Plants subjected to drought at stage D1 were less affected than those at other stages, while plants at stage D4 were most sensitive to drought, which reduced seed yield by c. 45% in 1987/88 and by c. 43% in 1988/89 relative to the control plants, suggesting that stage D4 is the stage of reproductive development most sensitive to soil drought in the faba bean.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 122 , Issue 1 , February 1994 , pp. 67 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Biscoe, P. V. (1972). The diffusion resistance and water status of leaves of Beta vulgaris. Journal of Experimental Botany 23, 930–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, J. S. (1976). Photosynthesis at low water potentials. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London B 272, 187–207.Google Scholar
Brix, H. (1962). The effect of water stress on the rates of photosynthesis and respiration in tomato plants and loblolly pine seedlings. Physiologia Plantarum 15, 10–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunce, J. A. & Miller, L. N. (1976). Differential effects of water stress on respiration in the light in woody plants from wet and dry habitats. Canadian Journal of Botany 54, 2457–2464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dantuma, G., Von Kittlitz, E., Frauen, M. & Bond, D. A. (1983). Yield, yield stability and measurements of morphological and phenological characters of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) varieties grown in a wide range of environments in western Europe. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenzuchtung 90, 85–105.Google Scholar
Elston, J. F., Karamanos, A. J., Icassan, A. H. & Wadsworth, R. M. (1976). The water responses of the field bean crop. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London B 273, 581–591.Google Scholar
Grashoff, C. (1990). Effect of pattern of water supply on Vicia faba L. I. Dry matter partitioning and yield variability. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 38, 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grzesiak, S., Koscielniak, J., Filek, W. & Augustyniak, G. (1989). Effects of soil drought in the generative phase of growth of field bean (Vicia faba L. var. minor) on leaf water status, photosynthesis rate and growth of biomass. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 162, 214–217.Google Scholar
Husain, M. M., Hill, G. D. & Gallagher, J. N. (1988). The response of field beans (Vicia faba L.) to irrigation and sowing date. 2. Growth and development in relation to yield. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 111, 232–254.Google Scholar
Jarvis, P. G. & Mansfield, T. A. (Eds) (1981). Stomatal Physiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, H. G. (1983). Plants and Microclimate: A Quantitative Approach to Environmental Plant Physiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kanemasu, E. T. & Tanner, C. B. (1969). Stomatal diffusion resistance of snap beans. I. Influence of leaf-water potential. Plant Physiology 44, 1547–1552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karamanos, A. J. (1978). Water stress and leaf growth of field beans (Vicia faba L.) in the field: leaf number and total leaf area. Annals of Botany 42, 1393–1402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larcher, W. (1980). Physiological Plant Ecology, 2nd edn.Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, U., Grimme, K., Meyer, C. & Ehlers, W. (1986). Leaf water potential and stomatal conductance of fieldgrown faba beans (Vicia faba L.) and oats (Avena saliva L.). Plant and Soil 93, 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. L. (1982). Response of four genotypes of spring faba beans (Vicia faba L. minor) to irrigation during the flowering period in the United Kingdom. FABIS Newsletter 4, 39–41.Google Scholar
Ståalfelt, M. G. (1955). The stomata as a hydrophotic regulator of the water deficit of the plant. Physiologia Plantarum 8, 572–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamaki, K. & Naka, J. (1971). Physiological studies of the growing process of the broad bean plant. Effects of soil moisture on the growth and the variations of chemical components in the various organs. Technical Bulletin of the Faculty of Agriculture of Kagawa University 22, 73–82.Google Scholar
Tang, Z. C. (1983 a). Response and adaptability of plants to water stress. I. General concepts of stress resistance and the resistance to water-logging in plants. Plant Physiology Communications 3, 24–29.Google Scholar
Tang, Z. C. (1983 b). Response and adaptability of plants to water stress. II. Response and adaptability of plants to drought. Plant Physiology Communications 4, 1–7.Google Scholar
Tang, Z. C. (1986). Water stress and plant stomatal movement. Progress of Physiology and Biochemistry in Plants 4, 43–50.Google Scholar
Vernon, L. P. (1960). Spectrophotometric determination of chlorophylls and pheophytins in plant extracts. Analytical Chemistry 32, 1140–1150.Google Scholar
Wang, F. X. (1982). Plant Ecology. Peking China: People's Education Publishing House Press of China.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. (1975). Stomatal diffusion resistances and leaf growth during droughting of Lolium perenne plants selected for contrasting epidermal ridging. Annals of Applied Biology 79, 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Z. H. & Pu, J. H. (1986). Brief introduction of photosynthesis instrument model GH III. Plant Physiology Communications 2, 58.Google Scholar
Xia, M. Z. (1990 a). A preliminary study of effect of soil water deficit on the photosynthetic characteristic of faba bean (Vicia faba). Ada Phytoecologica ET Geobotanica Sinica 14, 281–286.Google Scholar
Xia, M. Z. (1990 b). Physiological effects of water stress during flowering and podding stage of Vicia faba. Plant Physiology Communications 1, 14–19.Google Scholar