Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:31:58.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of plant density, irrigation and potassium and sodium fertilizers on sugar beet: I. Yields and nutrient composition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. P. Draycott ,
M. J. Durrant  and
D. J. Webb
A. P. Draycott
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds
M. J. Durrant
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds
D. J. Webb
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Three experiments (1970–2) on calcareous sandy loan tested all combinations of four plant densities (18500–124000 plants/ha), two amounts of potassium (0, 156 kg/K/ha) and sodium (0, 247 kg/Na/ha) fertilizer and two watering treatments on yield and chemical composition of sugar beet. The main effects of the treatments in all three experiments confirmed that at least 75000 plants/ha were needed for maximum sugar yield, that sodium fertilizer increased sugar yield more than potassium (+0.76 and +0.29 t/ha respectively) and that the crop responded to irrigation in some years (+1.35 t sugar/ha in 1970 and +1.67 t/ha in 1972).

Analysis of the growth of the crop showed that increasing the plant density increased leaf growth per unit area from singling onwards and giving irrigation increased it from July; the effects persisted until harvest and were reflected in increased sugar yields. Fertilizer increased leaf growth early in the season but the effect disappeared later, although sugar yield was still increased. Interactions between plant density, fertilizer treatment and irrigation were small every year but there were some consistent effects on sugar yield. The results suggest that in commercial practice the optimum density is 75000 plants/ha; where irrigation is not practised, 247 kg/ha of sodium and 70 kg/ha of potassium fertilizer should be given. Where irrigation is applied, only 247 kg/ha of sodium needs to be given as the extra water increases the uptake of soil potassium.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 82 , Issue 2 , April 1974 , pp. 251 - 259
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, S. N. (1961). The effect of sodium and potassium on sugar beet on the Lincolnshire limestone soils. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 56, 283–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P. & Durrant, M. J. (1971). Effects of nitrogen fertilizer, plant population and irrigation on sugar beet. III. Water consumption. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 76, 277–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P., Durrant, M. J. & Messem, A. B. (1974). Effects of plant density, irrigation and potas-sium and sodium fertilizers on sugar beet. II. Influence of soil moisture and weather. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 82, 261–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P. & Farley, R. F. (1971). Effect of sodium and magnesium fertilizers and irrigation on growth, composition and yield of sugar beet. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 22, 559–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Draycott, A. P. & Webb, D. J. (1971). Effects of nitrogen fertilizer, plant population and irrigation on sugar beet. I. Yields. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 76, 261–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durrant, M. J., Draycott, A. P. & Boyd, D. A. (1974). The response of sugar beet to potassium and sodium fertilizers. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge (In the press.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, P. M. (1972). The effect of plant population and irrigation on sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 78, 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, R. & Jaggard, K. W. (1971). Recent developments in the establishment of sugar beet stands. Field Crop Abstracts 24, 381–90.Google Scholar
Maughan, G. L. (1973). Mechanisation of the spring work in the cultivation of sugar beet. XXXVIth Winter Congress, Institut International de Recherches Betteravieres, Brussels.Google Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1962). Woburn Irrigation 1951–59. III. Results for rotation crops. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 58, 365–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1970). Woburn Irrigation 1960–68. VI. Results for rotation crops. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 75, 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinker, P. B. H. (1965). The effects of nitrogen, potassium and sodium fertilizers on sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 65, 207–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar