Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:18:00.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of nitrogen and its carriers with different topping heights on growth, yield and quality of tobacco

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. R. Mahadik
S. R. Mahadik
Affiliation:
University of Agriculture, Zemedelska 1, Brno
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In this investigation the largest amount of nitrogen used, 44 kg per hectare, increased leaf size, yield and amount of nicotine in the leaf. The three carriers of N had similar effects on growth and yield at each amount applied but calcium ammonium nitrate produced tobacco inferior in quality to that with ammonium sulphate and urea. Increasing topping height from 8 to 10 and to 12 leaves increased the total leaf area per plant and yields, delayed maturity and lowered the quality of the tobacco. The greatest yield was produced by using 44 kg of N and topping at 12 leaves, but the best quality resulted from using 44 kg of N and topping at 8 leaves.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 79 , Issue 2 , October 1972 , pp. 181 - 189
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, P. J. (1938). Nitrogen and potash requirements of tobacco crop. Bull. Conn, agric. Exp. Stn 334, 273–85.Google Scholar
Anitia, N. & Illf, C. (1959). The influence of nitrogen on tobacco. Lucr. Inst. cere, aliment, 4, 173–86.Google Scholar
Bhat, N. R. (1957). First glimpses of the way out of impasse on fertilizer uptake by flue-cured Virginia tobacco grown on black cotton soils of A. P. Indian Tob. 7, 85–96.Google Scholar
Binopovlos, X. (1959). Research on Greek tobacco with low nicotine content. Congr. Scient. int. Tobac. (1958–1959), 371–76.Google Scholar
Boturgin, C. & Hutter, W. (1957). Study on nitrogen and tobacco. An experiment on nitrogen fertilization at the Agricultural Experiment Station (Sidi-Slime) var. Burley. Terre. maroc. 31, 171–9.Google Scholar
Cabr, J. M. & Nbas, I. (1951). Topping and spacing in flue-cured tobacco. Bull. Oa agric. Exp. Stn 20, 1–16.Google Scholar
Chandwani, J. T. & Thomas, A. I. 1960. Preliminary studies on topping and suckering in Hookah tobacco. Indian J. Agron. 4, 144–7.Google Scholar
Chandwani, J. T., Thomas, A. I. & Reddy, B. (1959). Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potash on Nicotiana rustica tobacco. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 7, 107–13.Google Scholar
Chouteau, J. (1957). Effect of mineral N fertilizing on some physical and chemical characters of tobacco loaves. Ann. Inst. Exp. Tobac. Bergeral 2, 35–60.Google Scholar
Deperalta, F. & Baybayan, P. L. (1954). The effect of topping and desuckering on growth and development of tobacco leaves under Aveneta Institute of Agriculture conditions. Aveneta J. Agric. 14, 5–13.Google Scholar
Dimitrijevic, R. (1960). The effect of different combinations and rates of mineral fertilizers on the leaf yield and nicotine content of Nicotiana rustica L. Zborn. Had. pol'opriv Fak. Univ. Beogr. 8, 291–9.Google Scholar
Domt, N. (1962). Biochemical, Agrochemieal and technological-chemical studies of tobacco topping and its influence on yield and quality. Bulg. Sci. Lit. (Agric. For. Vet. Med.)7, Abst. 117.Google Scholar
Ferrer, L. G. (1954). Preliminary test on the effect of ammonium sulphate on the production of shadegrown wrapper tobacco at St Barbara, Pangasianan Province. Philipp. J. Agric. 17, 139–51.Google Scholar
Gowaikar, A. S. & Show, C. C. (1961). Effect of N.P.K. manuring on Bidi tobaoco (var. K-49). Indian Tob. 11, 53–9.Google Scholar
Gupta, P. S., Shukla, T. N. & Singh, M. (1961). Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus manuring on the yield of Hookah tobacco (Nicotiana rustica L). Indian Tob. 11, 187–90.Google Scholar
Kadam, B. S.Khemchandani, H. T. & Krishnan, A. S. (1952). Effect of topping and spacing on the yield of chewing tobacco. Indian Tob. 2, 238–44.Google Scholar
Krishnamurthy, T., Awatramani, N. A. & Kadam, B. S. (1954). Nitrogenous manuring, spacing and topping of Bidi tobacco in Gujrath. Indian Tob. 4, 124–38.Google Scholar
Mahajan, V. L. (1965). Studies on relative efficiency of soil and foliar application of nitrogen through urea on growth, yield and quality of tobacco. Thesis submitted to the Poona University of M.Sc. degree.Google Scholar
Matusiewicz, E. (1956). The effect deficiency and excess of nitrogen on plant growth, yield and nicotine content in tobacco in relation to soil moisture. Roczn. Nauk. roln. 72A, 435–48.Google Scholar
Micenko, E. A. (1959). The influence of topping time on yield and quality of tobacco. Bull Inf. CORESTA 1, Abstr. 2217.Google Scholar
Patel, G. J. & Patel, V. R. (1962). Nitrogenous manuring of Bidi tobacco. Indian J. Agron. 6, 198–211.Google Scholar
Patel, G. C., Singh, M. & Das, R. (1961a). Effect of some cultural and manural treatment on the yield and quality of Motihari tobacco (N. rustica L.) in North Bengal. Indian Tob. 11, 165– 78.Google Scholar
Patel, G. C., Singh, M. & Das, R. (1961b). Effect of some cultural and manural treatment on the yield and quality of Jati tobacco (N. tobacum L.)in North Bengal. Indian Tob. 11, 237–44.Google Scholar
Pritchett, W. L., Breland, H. L. & Lottdy, H. W. (1959). Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on the yield and composition of flue-cured tobacco. Proc. Soil Crop Sci. Soc. Fla 19, 418–27.Google Scholar
Reddy, B. (1953). Manuring of tobacco. Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirement for associateship of the I.A.R.I., New Delhi.Google Scholar
Sajnani, B. T. (1957). Influenoe of topping and spacing on yield & quality of Hookah and chewing tobacco (N. tobacum L.) in North Bengal. Indian Tob. 7, 165—76.Google Scholar
Sajnani, B. T. & Dhyani, K. C. (1959). Fertilization of Hookah and Chewing tobacco (N. tobacum L.) at varying levels of N.P.K. Indian Tob. 9, 157–64.Google Scholar
Samules, G. (1960). The influence of fertilizers on cigarfiller tobacco quality. J. Agric. Univ. P. Rico 44, 194–207.Google Scholar
Samuels, G., Ve-Les Santiago, G. & Monzano, M. (1960). A comparison of ammonium sulphate and urea as tobacco fertilizers. J. agric. Univ. P. Rico 44, 35–39.Google Scholar
SCott, W. A. (1950). Results of fertilizer experiments with Burley tobacco at Harrow. Horn. Expt. Sta. Harrow Lighter 20, 10–14.Google Scholar
Soomer, A. G. (1965). Urea a new important fertilizer. Fertil. News 10, 90–4.Google Scholar
TóTH, J. (1901). Neue Methode zur Bostimmung des Nicotins im Tabak und in den Wasserigen Ausziigen der Tabakblatter. Chemikenzeitung 25, 610.Google Scholar
Volodarsky, N. I. (1954). The influence of nitrogen on growth and morphology of tobacco plant. Trudy Inst. Fiziol. Rast. 8, 134–74.Google Scholar
Woltz, W. G. (1955). Some effects of topping and suckering on flue-cured tobacco. Tech. Bull. N. Carol, agric. Exp. Stn 106, 1–24.Google Scholar
Woltz, W. G. & Marshall, H. V. Jr (1958). Time of topping tobacco. Res. Fmg 17, 11.Google Scholar
Yoshida, D. & Takahashi, T.. (1960). Influenoe of nitrogen on nicotine synthesis in tobacco plant. Soi PI. Fd, Tokyo, 6, 1–6Google Scholar