Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:14:15.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of aldicarb, triazophos and benomyl plus zineb on the incidence of pests and pathogens and on the yields and nitrogen uptakes of leafless peas (Pisum sativum L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. McEwen ,
A. J. Cockbain ,
K. E. Fletcher ,
G. A. Salt ,
C. Wall ,
A. G. Whitehead  and
D. P. Yeoman
J. McEwen
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts. AL5 2JQ
A. J. Cockbain
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts. AL5 2JQ
K. E. Fletcher
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts. AL5 2JQ
G. A. Salt
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts. AL5 2JQ
C. Wall
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts. AL5 2JQ
A. G. Whitehead
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts. AL5 2JQ
D. P. Yeoman
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts. AL5 2JQ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Experiments testing the effects on leafless peas of aldicarb, triazophos and a mixture of benomyl with zineb, were made on clay-with-flints soil at Rothamsted and on sandy loam at Woburn in 1977 and 1978.

The crop was shown to be susceptible to a wide range of pests and pathogens including the pea and bean weevil Sitona lineatus, the migratory nematode genera Pratylenchus, Tylenchorhynchus and Tylenchus, the pea moth Cydia nigricana, the aphids Acyrihosiphon pisum and Macrosiphum euphorbiae, the bean leaf roll and pea enation mosaic viruses and the powdery mildew fungus Erysiphe polygoni.

The mean yield of the four experiments when none of the treatments was applied was 3·6 t grain/ha, increased to 4·3 t/ha when all were applied. Aldicarb had the largest effect and increased mean yield at Rothamsted by 0·3 t/ha, attributed mainly to control of S. lineatus, and by 0·8 t/ha at Woburn attributed to control of S. lineatus and perhaps also to migratory nematodes, particularly Tylenchorhynchus. Triazophos and benomyl plus zineb did not individually increase yield but at Woburn when both aldicarb and triazophos were applied benomyl plus zineb increased mean yield by 0·7 t/ha.

All crops lodged severely, irrespective of treatment but perhaps because of experimental conditions. We suggest that susceptibility to lodging under field-scale conditions requires further study.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 93 , Issue 3 , December 1979 , pp. 687 - 692
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bardner, B. & Fletcher, K. E. (1979). Larvae of the pea and bean weevil, Sitona lineatus, and the yield of field beans. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 109–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, K. S. (1962). Boot nodule damage by larvae of Sitona lineatus and its effect on the yield of green peas. Plant Pathology 11, 172–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, K. S., Light, W. I. St. G. & Gaib, B. (1962). Effects of artificial defoliation of pea plants on the yield of shelled peas. Plant Pathology 11, 73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaulay, E. D. M. (1977). Field trials with attractant traps for timing sprays to control pea moth. Plant Pathology 26, 179–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaulay, E. D. M. & Lewis, T. (1977). Attractant traps for monitoring pea moth, Cydia nigricana (Fabr.). Ecological Entomology 2, 279–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEwen, J., Salt, G. A. & Hornby, D. (1973). The effects of dazomet and fertilizer nitrogen on field beans (Viciafaba L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 80, 105–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogilvib, L. (1969). Diseases of Vegetables. MAFF Bulletin no. 123, 6th ed.London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Rothamsted Experimental Station (1977, 1978). Control of pathogens. Yields of the Field Experiments, 77/R/PE/l, 77/W/PE/l, 78/R/PE/l, 78/W/PE/l.Google Scholar
Salt, G . & Hollick, F. S. J. (1944). Studies of wireworm populations. I. A census of wireworms in pasture. Annals of Applied Biology 31, 52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snoad, B. (1974). A preliminary assessment of ‘leafless peas’. Euphytica 23, 257–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snoad, B. & Gent, G. P. (1974). Practical assessment of new pea phenotypes. John Innes Institute Report, pp. 22–23.Google Scholar
Wall, C., Greenway, A. B. & Burt, P. E. (1976). Electroantennographic and field responses of the pea moth, Cydia nigricana, to sex attractants and related compounds. Physiological Entomology 1, 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, B. M. (1977). Nematodes. Rothamsted Report or 1976, part 1, 153.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. G. & Fraser, J. E. (1972). Injury to field beans (Vicia faba L.) by Tylenchorhynchus dubius. Plant Pathology 21, 112–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar