Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T01:35:17.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Digestibility and chemical composition of fractions of lucerne during spring and summer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

K. R. Christian ,
D. B. Jones  and
M. Freer
K. R. Christian
Affiliation:
Division of Plant Industry, CSIRO, Canberra, A.C.T. Australia
D. B. Jones
Affiliation:
Division of Plant Industry, CSIRO, Canberra, A.C.T. Australia
M. Freer
Affiliation:
Division of Plant Industry, CSIRO, Canberra, A.C.T. Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Bulk harvests of primary growth were made at intervals during the spring and summer of 2 consecutive years from an ungrazed area of lucerne (Medicago sativa) and the digestibility by sheep was measured. At the same times, shoots of known length representative of the sward were collected, divided into 7·5 cm lengths, and separated into leaf and stem for the determination of ash, nitrogen, cellulose, and in vitro organic matter digestibility.

Digestibility and leaf: stem ratio of the bulk harvests decreased and dry matter increased as the season advanced. Leaf composition changed little, but stem increased in lignin and decreased in ash and in vitro digestibility. In vitro digestibility and leaf: stem ratio were highly correlated with sheep digestibility.

Chemical composition of shoots of known heights was similar to that of the bulk harvests. Leaf weights/shoot tended to increase linearly with height of shoot, whereas stem increased nearly as the square of the height. Dry matter of leaf and stem were inversely related to leaf:stem ratio. Stem digestibility decreased with leaf:stem ratio and with increase in shoot height.

Chemical components of shoot fractions were associated with each other and were largely dependent on the distance from the top of the shoot at which they had been taken, irrespective of shoot height or time of year. Bottom stems had lower ash, nitrogen and digestibility but higher cellulose, dry weight and dry matter than top stems, whose composition approached that of leaves. Leaf fractions showed little consistent trend with position on the shoot.

Some of the difficulties in studying changes in plant composition under field conditions are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 75 , Issue 2 , October 1970 , pp. 213 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alder, F. E. & Minson, D. J. (1963). The herbage intake of cattle grazing lucerne and cocksfoot pastures. J. agric. Sci. Camb. 60, 359–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, M. J., Kopland, D. V., Fries, G. F. & Waldo, D. R. (1964). Digestibility of first-crop alfalfa hay in Utah and Montana. J. Dairy Sci. 47, 686.Google Scholar
Armitage, E. F., Ashworth, R. de B. & Ferguson, W. S. (1948). The determination of lignin in plant material of high protein content. J. Soc. chem. Ind. Land. 67, 241–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calder, F. W. & MacLeod, L. B. (1968). In vitro digestibility of forage species as affected by fertilizer application, stage of development and harvest dates. Can. J. Pl Sci. 48, 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, B. R. & Mowat, D. N. (1968). Variability of in vitro digestibility among clones of bromegrass and orchardgrass. Can. J. Pl Sci. 48, 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crampton, E. W. & Maynard, L. A. (1938). The relation of cellulose and lignin content to the nutritive value of animal feeds. J. Nutr. 15, 383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, W. E. (1963). In Welsh Plant Breeding Station Aberystwyth Ann. Report, pp. 38–40.Google Scholar
Davies, W. E., Griffith, G. Ap & Ellington, A. (1966). The assessment of herbage legume varieties. II. In vitro digestibility, water soluble carbohydrate crude protein and mineral content of primary growth of clover and lucerne. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 66, 351–7.Google Scholar
Gaillard, , Blanche, D. E. (1962). The relationship between the cell-wall constituents of roughages and the digestibility of the organic matter. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 59, 369–73.Google Scholar
Hardison, W. A., Linkous, W. N., Ward, C. Y., Blaser, R. E., Engel, R. W. & Graf, G. C. (1955). The intake and digestibility of nutrients in the top and bottom portions of the alfalfa plant. J. Anim. Sci. 14, 1238.Google Scholar
Heinrichs, D. H. & Troelsen, J. E. (1965). Variability of chemical constituents in an alfalfa population. Can. J. Pl. Sci. 45, 450–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oh, Hi Kon, Baumgardt, B. R. & Scholl, J. M. (1966). Evaluation of forages in the laboratory. V. Comparison of chemical analyses, solubility tests, and in vitro fermentation. J. Dairy Sci. 49, 850–5.Google Scholar
Hidiroglou, M., Dermine, P., Hamilton, H. A. & Troelsen, J. E. (1966). Chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of forage as affected by season in Northern Ontario. Can. J. Pl. Sci. 46, 101–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Julen, G. & Lager, A. (1966). Use of the in vitro digestibility test in plant breeding. Proc. 10th Int. Grassld Congr., Helsinki, pp. 652–7.Google Scholar
Kamstra, L. D., Moxon, A. L. & Bentley, O. G. (1955). Effect of lignification in plants on digestion of the plant cellulose in vitro. J. Anim. Sci. 14, 1238.Google Scholar
Leach, G. J. (1968). The growth of the lucerne plant after cutting: the effects of cutting at different stages of maturity and at different intensities. Aust. J. agric. Res. 19, 517–30.Google Scholar
Martz, F. A. M. (1961). Factors affecting the digestibility of alfalfa and brome grass. Diss. Abstr. 22, 2131.Google Scholar
Mowat, D. N., Fulkerson, R. S., Tossell, W. E. & Winch, J. E. (1965a). The in vitro digestibility and protein content of leaf and stem portions of forages. Can. J. Pl Sci. 45, 321–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowat, D. N., Fulkerson, R. S., Tossell, W. E. & Winch, J. E. (1965b). The in vitro dry matter digestibility of several species and varieties and their plant parts with advancing stages of maturity. Proc. 9th Int. Grassld Congr., Sao Paulo, pp. 801–6.Google Scholar
Terry, R. A. & Tilley, J. M. A. (1964). The digestibility of the leaves and stems of perennial ryegrass, cocksfoot, timothy, tall fescue, lucerne and sainfoin, as measured by an in vitro procedure. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 19, 363–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. & Terry, R. A. (1963). A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 18, 104–11.Google Scholar
Trevelyan, W. E. & Harrison, J. S. (1952). Studies on yeast metabolism. I. Fractional and microdetermination of cell carbohydrates. Biochem. J. 50, 299–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, A. I. (1961). Quantitative Inorganic Analysis. London: Longmans, 3rd ed. p. 580.Google Scholar
Weir, W. C., Jones, L. G. & Meyer, J. N. (1960). Effect of cutting interval and stage of maturity on the digestibility and yield of alfalfa. J. Anim. Sci. 19, 5–19.Google Scholar
White, E. P., Thompson, F. B. & Brice, N. (1948). Application of the Dumas micromethod to pasture nitrogen analysis. Analyst, Lond. 73, 146–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodman, H. E., Evans, R. E. & Norman, D. B. (1934). Nutritive value of lucerne. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 24, 283–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar