Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T01:32:16.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differences between sheep and cattle in digestibility, voluntary intake and retention time in the rumen of three tropical grasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. C. Rees  and
D. A. Little
M. C. Rees
Affiliation:
C.S.I.R.O. Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures, Cunningham Laboratory, St. Lucia, Queensland 4067, Australia
D. A. Little
Affiliation:
C.S.I.R.O. Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures, Cunningham Laboratory, St. Lucia, Queensland 4067, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the assessment of the nutritive value of feeds for animals, measurement of digestibility has been a basic index since 1860 (Schneider & Flatt, 1965). In this laboratory, measurements of digestibility and voluntary feed consumption using sheep have been the basis of feed evaluation procedures for over 20 years (e.g. Milford, 1960). The plants with which our group is concerned, however, are mainly grazed by cattle, and it is important to establish the degree to which extrapolation of results from sheep to cattle is justified for tropical pasture species. Many comparisons between sheep and cattle in terms of digestibility of dry matter and other aspects of feed utilization have been made using temperate pasture species hays, silages, grains and mixed rations; this area has been thoroughly reviewed by Schneider & Flatt (1965). Very few such studies have been made using tropical species, and most of those in Australia have involved the native species Heteropogon contortus (Siebert & Kennedy, 1972) or mixed H. contortus and Bothriochloa decipiens (Playne, 1978), providing material of low quality, containing less than 1% nitrogen. Playne (1970) used one introduced tropical species, buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris), and in that work only one of three harvests contained over 1% nitrogen. In the present work three introduced tropical species have been examined, covering a wider range of quality than has been reported previously.

Type
Short Notes
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 94 , Issue 2 , April 1980 , pp. 483 - 485
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bird, P. R. (1974). Sulphur metabolism and excretion studies in ruminants. XIII. Intake and utilization of wheat straw by sheep and cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 25, 631–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, N. McC. (1972). Units of metabolic body size for comparisons amongst adult sheep and cattle. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 9, 352–355.Google Scholar
Milford, R. (1960). Nutritional value of subtropical pasture speoies under Australian conditions. Proceedings 8th International Grassland Congress, pp. 474–479.Google Scholar
Minson, D. J. (1966). The apparent retention of food in the reticulo-remen at two levels of feeding by means of an hourly feeding technique. British Journal of Nutrition 20, 765–773.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Playne, M. J. (1970). Differences in the nutritional value of three cuts of buffel grass for sheep and cattle. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 8, 511–516.Google Scholar
Playne, M. J. (1978). Differences between cattle and sheep in their digestion and relative intake of a mature tropical grass hay. Animal Feed Science and Technology 3, 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, C. S. W. (1965). Quantitative studies of digestion in the reticulo-rumen. I. Total removal and return of digesta for quantitative sampling in studies of digestion in the reticulo-rumen of cattle. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 25, 65–84.Google Scholar
Schneider, B. H. & Flatt, W. A. (1965). In The Evaluation of Feeds Through Digestibility Experiments. Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Siebert, B. D. & Kennedy, P. M. (1972). The utilization of spear grass (Heteropogon contortus). I. Factors limiting intake and utilization by cattle and sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar