Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:18:01.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Determination of the Surface Area of Swine and Other Animals (With Plates I and II and Three Text-figures.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Thomas Deighton
Affiliation:
(From the Institute of Animal Nutrition, School of Agriculture, Cambridge.)

Extract

The unsatisfactory nature of empirical formulae for the determination of surface area in metabolism work, especially with reference to pigs, is discussed, and the conclusion reached that the actual estimation of the area is the only satisfactory method where an accuracy greater than ± 10 per cent. is desired.

It is pointed out that surface area is to some extent variable in animals and that direct determinations are from this point of view less satisfactory than might have been thought.

A new method is proposed for estimating the surface area of a pig in a definite standing position depending on mathematical and photographic conditions only, and therefore applicable to the living animal, and to the same animal at different times during its life. Full sets of computations are given and one case is noted where the method affords a correct estimate as between two pigs where the formulae are all clearly wrong.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1932

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Meeh, K.Oberflächenmessungen des menschlichen Körpers. Z. Biol. (1879), 15, 425.Google Scholar
(2)Vorr, E.Über die Grösse des Energiebedarfes der Tiere in Hungerzustande. Z. Biol. (1901), 41, 113.Google Scholar
(3)Rubner, M.Gesetze des Energieverbrauches bei der Ernährung. F. Deuticke, Leipzig u. Wien (1902), p. 280.Google Scholar
(4)Brody, S., Comfort, J. E. and Matthews, J. S.Further investigations on surface area with special reference to its significance in energy metabolism. Univ. Missouri Coll. Agric. Exp. Stn. Research Bull. 115 (1928).Google Scholar
(5)Hogan, A. G. and Skouby, C. I.Determination of the surface area of cattle and swine. J. Agric. Res. (1923), 25, 419.Google Scholar
(6), Hecker. Z.f. Veterinärkunde (1894) (cit.).Google Scholar
(7)Trowbridge, P. F., Moulton, C. R. and Haigh, L. D.The maintenance requirement of cattle. Missouri Agr. Exp. Stn. Res. Bull. 18 (1915).Google Scholar
(8)Cowgill, G. R. and Drabkin, D. L.Determination of a formula for the surface area of the dog, together with a consideration of formulae available for other species. Amer. J. Physiol. (1927), 81, 36.Google Scholar
(9)Seuffert, R. W., Giese, R. and Meyer, R.Beitr. z. Physiol. (1926), III. 203 (cit.).Google Scholar
(10)Harris, A. and Benedict, F. G.A biometric study of basal metabolism. Carn. Inst. Wash. (1919), pub. 279, p. 199.Google Scholar
(11)Rubner, M.Leben des Kaltblüters, II. B. Das Oberflächengesetz. Biochem. Z. (1924), 148, 285302.Google Scholar
(12)Lusk, G.Science of Nutrition, 4th ed. (1928), p. 122.Google Scholar
(13)Bohnenkamp, H.et al. Mitt. I-V. Untersuchungen zu den Grundlagen des Energie- und Stoffwechsels. Pflügers Archiv (1931), 288, 40.Google Scholar
(14)Mitchell, H. H.The significance of surface area determinations. J. Nut. (1930), II, 441.Google Scholar
(15)Capstick, J. W. and Wood, T. B.The progress of metabolism after food in swine. Proc. Roy. Soc. (1922), B, 94, 35.Google Scholar
(16)Brody, S. and Elting, E. C.A new method for measuring surface area and its utilisation to determine the relation between growth in surface area and growth in weight and skeletal growth in dairy cattle. Missouri Agr. Exp. Stn. Res. Bull. 89 (1926).Google Scholar
(17) See also Brody, S., Comfort, J. E. and Matthews, J. S.Loc. cit. p. 38.Google Scholar
(18)Sawyer, M., Stone, R. H. and Du Bois, E. F.Further measurements of the surface area of adults and children. Arch. Int. Med. (1916), xvii, 2, 855.Google Scholar
(19) See Rohr, M. v.. Theorie u. Gesch. des Photographischen Objectivs. Berlin (1899) (cit.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(20) Report on the Pork and Bacon Trades in England and Wales. Min. Agric. and Fish. (1928), Economic Series, No. 17, plate, p. 88.Google Scholar