Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:20:14.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The decline of a pea root eelworm (Heterodera göttingiana Liebscher) population in the absence of host plants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

F. Moriarty
F. Moriarty
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The decline of a pea root eelworm (Heterodera göttingiana Liebscher) population, of which most eggs were formed in 1955, was measured annually from 1955 to 1958 in twenty-two microplots containing loamy sand, and measurements were continued in one of these microplots from 1960 to 1962.

2. Sampling errors increased when egg populations were more than 4 years old.

3. Two crop rotations (fallow, and maize, fallow, carrots) had no effect on decline rate from 1955 to 1958, nor did initial eelworm density.

4. After 3 years the egg population was still 48% of that in 1955. Subsequently the population declined on average by more than 50% per annum. It is suggested that host crops should not be grown more than once every five years.

5. Cysts declined more slowly, with a mean annual rate of 26%.

6. A sharp decline in eggs during the first year followed by at least one year's relative quiescence may be general in Heterodera species; with H. göttingiana unexpected crop failures may be associated in part with the prolongation of this relative quiescence for more than 1 year.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 61 , Issue 1 , August 1963 , pp. 135 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brown, E. B. (1958). Nematologica, 3, 257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodey, J. B. (1957). Laboratory methods for work with plant and soil nematodes. Tech. Bull. no. 2, 3rd ed., 47 pp. Minist. Agric, London, H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Jones, F. G. W. (1950). Ann. appl. Biol. 37, 407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moriarty, F. (1960). Ann. appl. Biol. 48, 665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moriarty, F. (1962). Nematologica, 8, 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moriarty, F. (1963). Nematologica, 9 (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ouden, H. Den (1960). Nematologica (suppl. 2), 101.Google Scholar
Winslow, R. D. (1955 a). Plant Path. 4, 86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winslow, R. D. (1955 b). Ann. appl. Biol. 43, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar