Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T15:44:10.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cultivation of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) under temperate climatic conditions in Denmark

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S.-E. Jacobsen
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Sciences, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Thorvaldsensvej 40, 1871 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
I. Jørgensen
Affiliation:
The Danish Institute of Plant and Soil Science, Ledreborg Allé 100, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
O. Stølen
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Sciences, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Thorvaldsensvej 40, 1871 Frederiksberg C, Denmark

Summary

Field experiments with the South American grain crop, quinoa, were carried out at two sites in Denmark in 1988–90 in order to study the effects of varying the nitrogen fertilization rate, seed rate, row spacing, harvesting method and harvest date. Although there was a significant yield increase when the amount of nitrogen fertilizer was increased from 40 to 160 kg N/ha, quinoa seems to be well adapted to poor soils. Yield decreased by 24–1% when the nitrogen supply was reduced from 160 to 40 kg N/ha, while the yield decrease was 120 and 2–7% when the nitrogen supply was reduced to 80 and 120 kg/ha, respectively.

A model expressing yield as a function of plant density, for three experiments analysed as one, showed an optimal plant density with respect to yield of 327 ± 220 plants/m2. This plant density was the top point of the curve relating yield to plant density. However, the large standard deviation indicates that apparently a rather wide range of plant densities would provide similar yields. When the row spacing was varied, it was shown that plots with a row spacing of 50 cm, which were hoed, gave a higher yield than plots with 25 or 12·5 cm row spacing, which were unhoed. There was an overall increase in yield when changing from combined harvesting to swathing; however, when comparing the yields from the optimal harvest dates for the two methods, no yield differences could be detected. The optimal harvest date for swathing was found to be the stage when the inflorescences start to turn brown, whereas for combining, the optimal harvest date was the stage when most of the inflorescences are already brown.

Type
Crops and Soils
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, M. & Von Rutte, S. (1990). Fertilizatión. In Quinoa, hacia su cultivo comercial (Ed. Wahli, C.), pp. 107116. Latinreco SA.Google Scholar
Barahona, E. T. (1975). Efeclo del distanciamiento, densidad de siembra y variedades en el cultivo de la quinoa. Thesis, Universidad National Técnica del Altiplano, Peru.Google Scholar
Blanco, C. (1970). La quinua: cómo se debe cultivar. Oruro, Bolivia: Universidad Tecnica.Google Scholar
Burgasi, G., Pavón, J. & Von Rütte, S. (1990). Cultivo comercial. In Quinoa, hacia su cultivo comercial (Ed. Wahli, C.), pp. 117136. Latinreco SA.Google Scholar
Cusack, D. F. (1984). Quinua: grain of the Incas. Ecologist 14, 2131.Google Scholar
Denis-Ramirez, A. R. & Jacobsen, S.-E. (1987). Quinoa. Ugeskhftfor Jordbrug 7, 179184.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, S.-E. & Denis-Ramirez, A. R. (1986). Quinoaen sydamerikansk proteinafgrode. Agrologisk Tidsskrift Marken 12, 2325.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, S.-E. & Stolen, O. (1993). Quinoa – morphology, phenology and prospects for its production as a new crop in Europe. European Journal of Agronomy 2, 1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortiz, L. (1974). Avances en la investigacion agricola en Puno. Puno, Peru: Ministerio de Agricultura.Google Scholar
Rea, J., Tápia, M. & Mujica, A. (1979). Practicas agronomicas. In Quinoa y kañiwa (Eds Tapia, M., Gandarillas, H., Alandia, S., Cardozo, A., Mujica, A., Ortiz, R., Otazu, V., Rea, J., Salas, B. & Zanabria, E.), pp. 83120. CIID/IICA.Google Scholar