Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:45:56.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Corolla Tube Length and Nectar Height of Fl Red Clover Plants (Trifolium pratense) and Their Seed Yield Following Honey-Bee Pollination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. A. Bond
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, Cambridge
J. L. Fyfe
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, Cambridge

Summary

Crosses between nine inbred lines of diploid doublecut red clover were measured for corolla tube length and nectar height, caged with honey-bees, and observations made on the number of bee visits and seed yield. There was evidence of additive genetic variation in nectar height, corolla tube length, bee visits and seed yield. The possibilities for improvement in these characters by selection are discussed. Attention is drawn to a remarkable discriminating behaviour of honey-bees, in that they could apparently recognize plants which had only one parent in common. A cage with a strong colony of honey-bees produced more than twice as much seed as a cage with a weak colony, and plants near to hives gave significantly more seed than plants distant from hives. Plants of English origin tended to have higher and more accessible nectar, more bee visits and greater seed yield than plants of continental origin.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benoit, F., Gillard, A. & Brande, J. Van Den (1948). Bijdrage tot de studie van de zaadzetting bij rode klaver (Trifolium pratenseL.) in verband met de zaadproduetie. Meded. LandbHoogesch. OpzoekStns Gent. 13, 297346.Google Scholar
Boben, R. B., Paekeb, R. L. & Sorensen, E. L. (1962). Foraging behaviour of honey-bees on selected alfalfa clones. Crop Sci. 2, 185–8.Google Scholar
Dennis, B. A. & Haas, H. (1967). Pollination and seed setting in diploid and tetraploid red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) under Danish conditions. II. Studies of floret morphology in relation to the working speed of honey-bees and bumble-bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidae). K. Vet- og Landbohaisk. Aarsskr. 118–33.Google Scholar
Dent, J. W. & Hawkins, R. P. (1962). The effect of fertilizers on the yield of red clover seed. J. agric. Sci., Comb. 59, 1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Free, J. B. (1965). The ability of bumble-bees and honey-bees to pollinate red clover. J. appl. Ecol. 2, 289–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fyfe, J. L. & Gilbert, N. (1963). Partial diallel crosses. Biometrics 19, 278–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R. P. (1958). A survey of late flowering and singlecut red clover seed crops. J. natn. Inst. agric. Bot. 8, 450–61.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R. P. (1961). Observations of the pollination of red clover by bees. I. The yield of seed in relation to the number and kind of pollinators. Ann. appl. Biol. 49, 4465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R. P. (1965). Factors affecting the yield of seed produced by different varieties of red clover. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 65, 245–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R. P. (1966). The pollination of red clover by bees in England and Wales. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Pollination, London, 1964. Bee Wld 47 (Suppl.), 51–7.Google Scholar
Hogborg, E. (1966). Bumble-bees and honey-bees as pollinators in diploid red clover. Inventory and trials in southeastern Sweden 1959–64. LantbrHögsk. Meddn, no. 47, p. 52.Google Scholar
Ryle, M. (1954). The influence of nitrogen, phosphate and potash on the secretion of nectar. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 44, 400–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starling, T. M., Wilsie, C. P. & Gilbert, N. W. (1950). Corolla tube length studies in red clover. Agron. J. 42, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, N. L., Dade, E. & Garrison, C. S. (1966). Factors involved in seed production of red clover clones and their polycross progenies at two diverse locations. Crop Sci. 6, 535–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar