Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:47:06.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Control of manganese deficiency in field peas grown for seed or human consumption

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

C. M. Knott
Affiliation:
Processors and Growers Research Organisation, The Research Station, Great North Road, Thornhaugh, Peterborough PE8 6HJ, UK

Summary

The effect of foliar applications of different formulations of manganese on pea yield and ‘marsh spot’, a seed defect which reduces quality of peas (Pisum sativum) grown for human consumption or seed was evaluated in nine experiments in the East of England from 1992 to 1994. Sprays, at dose rates recommended by the manufacturer, were applied to field peas, cvs Maro or Bunting, on three occasions at the four node pea growth stage, first pod and 14 days later, or on two occasions at first pod stage and 14 days later. Although the sites selected had a previous history of marsh spot in pea crops, there were no visual foliar symptoms of manganese deficiency in peas grown in any year at any site. Applications of manganese did not increase yields compared with untreated peas and there was no effect on maturity. Marsh spot was negligible in untreated peas at sites where soils had the lowest levels of manganese (22 and 44 mg/kg), thus soil analysis for manganese may be inappropriate as a guide to prediction of marsh spot problems. The three spray programmes, which included an early application of manganese at the 4–5 node stage, gave no statistically significant improvements in marsh spot control. There was a good correlation between amounts of manganese applied and reductions in marsh spot, and manganese sulphate, 31% w/w at 3·1 kg/ha applied as a split dose, achieved the best control. An exception was the manganese carbonate 50% w/v formulation which may have been poorly assimilated by the plant. Chelated manganese as MnEDTA 6·4% w/v at the rates recommended by the manufacturer was inadequate for control of marsh spot in all years.

Type
Crops and Soils
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Biddle, A. J. & Knott, C. M. (1988). Pea Growing Handbook. Peterborough, UK: Processors and Growers Research Organisation.Google Scholar
De Bruyn, H. L. G. (1939). Mangaangebrek, oorzaak van de kwade harten van erwten. Tijdschrift over Plantenziekten 45, 106120.Google Scholar
Henkens, C. H. (1958). The prevention of marsh spot in peas by spraying with manganese sulphate. Landbouwvoorlichting 15, 262265.Google Scholar
Koopman, C. (1937). Invloed van mangaansulfaatbespuiting tegen kwaadhartigheid bij schokkererwten. Tijdschrift over Plmuenziekten 43, 6466.Google Scholar
Knott, C. M. (1987). A key for stages of development of the pea (Pisum sativum). Annals of Applied Biology 111, 233244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lammers, R. P. (1949). The control of marsh spot in peas. Pod Vegetable Study Group Technical Bulletin No. 52. Duivendaal 10, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Lewis, A. H. (1939). Manganese deficiencies in crops. I. Spraying pea crops with solutions of manganese salts to eliminate marsh-spot. Empire Journal of Experimental Agriculture 7, 150154.Google Scholar
Pethybridge, G. H. (1936). Marsh spot in pea seeds; is it a deficiency disease? Journal of Ministry of Agriculture, April 1936.Google Scholar