Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T08:53:50.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of the effect of rainfall on spring- and autumn-dressed wheat at Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden (With Five Text-figures.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

“Alumnus”
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The effect of rainfall on the wheat crop grown on Broadbalk has been investigated, special attention being paid to the time of application of the nitrogenous manures.

In the years 1854–77, when plots were manured solely in the autumn, the average decrease in yield caused by each additional inch of rain is greater than the average decrease from 1854–1918. The difference in this case cannot be ascribed to the change in manurial treatment.

The period of 24 years was too short to allow seasonal variation in the effect of rain to appear, as it was only possible to compare such seasonal variation with that of 1854–1918 in the case of one plot. In this case it was observed that summer rainfall was more detrimental to autumn-dressed than to spring-dressed plots; this result was confirmed by studies of the effect of rain on the difference in yield of two plots which differed only in the time of application of their manures.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , January 1932 , pp. 101 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1932

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Fisher, R. A. The influence of rainfall on the yield of wheat at Rothamsted. Phil. Trans. (1924), B, 213, 89.Google Scholar
(2)Fisher, R. A.Statistical Methods for Research Workers (1930). 3rd edition. Oliver and Boyd. Sections 29, 37 and 47.Google Scholar
(3)Smith, T. The calculation of determinants and their minors. Phil. Mag. (1927), 1007.Google Scholar