Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:33:26.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of methods of extending part lactation records for sire evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. K. Rao
Affiliation:
National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal (Haryana), India 132001
D. Sundaresan
Affiliation:
National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal (Haryana), India 132001

Summary

The first lactation records of 684 Sahiwal, 157 Brown Swiss × Sahiwal (BS × S) and 255 Friesian × Sahiwal (F × S) constituted the data for this study. The 300-day yield was estimated from part lactation yields of 13, 17, 21, 26 and 30 weeks post partum by four methods, namely, regression, ratio, gamma and inverse polynomial functions. The duration of the part record and the method of estimation were evaluated for their reliability in estimating the 300-day yield and sire evaluation.

The correlations between part records and 300-day yield ranged from 0·76 to 0·95, thecorrelations being higher in F × S. The error, absolute error and standard deviation of error weresmaller for ratio and regression methods than for the gamma and inverse polynomial functions. The part records of 30 weeks or more were found to be necessary to estimate 300-day yield within 15% of the actual yield with regression or ratio methods.

The rank correlations and product moment correlations between sire indices calculated with part records and 300-day yield were found to be highly significant. The part records of 17 weeks or more extended by ratio or regression could be used to evaluate sires as accurately as with 300-day yield by increasing the progeny group size by 7–10% in Sahiwal and by about 20% in F × S. Theloss of efficiency in sire evaluation amounted to about 10–15% with part records of 17 weeks or more compared with 300-day yield.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auran, T. (1976). Studies on monthly and cumulative monthly milk yield records. IV. Estimating total lactation from part-lactation. Ada Agriculturae Scandinavica 26, 1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, G.R. & Ahmad, M. D. (1972). Prediction of first lactation yield from part lactations in Sahiwal cows. Journal of Agricultural Research, Punjab, Pakistan 10, 148153 (cited in Animal Breeding Abstracts 41, 1532).Google Scholar
Lamb, B.C. & McGilliard, L.D. (1967 a). Ratio factors to estimate 305-day production from lactation records in progress. Journal of Dairy Science 50, 11011108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, R.C. & McGilliard, L.D. (19676). Usefulness of part records toestimate the breeding values of dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 50, 14581467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madden, D.E., Lush, J.L. & McGilliard, L.D. (1955). Relations between part lactations and producing ability of Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 38, 12641271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R.H., Hooven, N. W. Jr, Smith, J.W., Harvey, W.R. & Greegan, M.E. (1972). Modified regression for estimating total lactation from partlactation yields. Journal of Dairy Science 55, 208213.Google Scholar
Neldeb, J.A. (1966). Inverse polynomials, a useful group of multi-factor response functions. Biometrics 22, 128141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raheja, K.L. & Balaine, D.S. (1977). Studies on monthly and cumulative monthly records in Hariana purebreds and their crosses with some exotic breeds. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 30, 7377.Google Scholar
Searle, S.R. (1961). Part lactations. DI. Progeny testing with part lactation records. Journal of Dairy Science 44, 921927.Google Scholar
Singh, M. & Acharya, R.M. (1969). Inheritance of part lactation in Hariana cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 52, 775779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syrstad, O. (1964). Studies on dairy herd records. I. Evaluation of incomplete records. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 14, 129149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Vleck, L.D. (1962). Sire evaluation from fivemonth daughter records. Journal of Animal Science 21, 633638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Vleck, L.D. & Henderson, C.R. (1961 a). Extending part lactation milk records by regression ignoring herd effects. Journal of Dairy Science 44, 15191528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Vleck, L.D. & Henderson, C.R. (1961 b). Use of part lactation records in sire evaluation. Journal of Dairy Science 44, 15111518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, P.D.P. (1969). Factors affecting the shape of the lactation curve in cattle. Animal Production 11, 307316.Google Scholar