Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:27:00.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Brahman cattle in a temperate environment:I. Live-weight gains and carcass characteristics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. B. Moran
J. B. Moran
Affiliation:
Department of Livestock Husbandry, University of New England, Armidale, N.S.W., Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A study was made of the live-weight gains of four ¾-bred Brahman and four purebred Hereford steers over a 12-month period. At 950 lb live weight each animal was slaughtered, after which the carcass characteristics of the two breed types were compared.

The Herefords showed the highest live-weight gains over the whole year but during autumn, when nutritional levels were poor, the Brahmans had an advantage in average daily gain.

Although both breed types varied greatly in body conformation, there was little appreciable difference in weight distribution of joints on the carcass. A higher dressing percentage was observed in the Brahmans, this being attributed to their smaller alimentary tracts. The Brahmans had a greater carcass muscle and smaller carcass fat content than the Herefords. The necessity for fat trimming of the Hereford carcasses reduced their calculated retail value index to a level below that of the Brahmans in a market which discriminated against excess fat.

Thus it was concluded that even in a temperate climate, Brahman cattle can have a place in improving productive efficiency. Apart from the heterosis developed in crossbreeding, benefits should flow from the Brahmans superiority on poor pastures and the improved production of lean meat on their carcasses.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 74 , Issue 2 , April 1970 , pp. 315 - 321
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1965). Recommended Procedures for Use in the Measurement of Beef Cattle and Carcasses. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Arbuckle, J. (1958). More beef from Brahman cross. Qd agric. J. 84, 427.Google Scholar
Berg, R. T. & Butterfield, R. M. (1966). Muscle: bone ratio and fat percentage as measures of beef carcass composition. Anim. Prod. 8, 1.Google Scholar
Butler, O. D., Reddish, R. L., King, G. T. & Simms, R. L. (1956a). Factors contributing to the difference in dressing percentage between Hereford and Brahman x Hereford steers. J. Anim. Sci. 15, 523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, O. D.Warwick, B. L. & Cartwright, T. C. (1956 b). Slaughter and carcass characteristics of shortfed yearling, Hereford and Brahman x Hereford steers. J. Anim. Sci. 15, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. (1963). Relative growth of the musculature of the ox. Proc. C.S.I.B.O. Tech. Conf. on Carcass Composition and Appraisal of Meat Animal. Melbourne. Paper 7.Google Scholar
Carpenter, J. W., Palmer, A. Z., Kirk, W. G., Peacock, F. M. & Koger, M. (1964). Slaughter and carcass characteristics of Brahman and Brahman-Shorthorn steers. Univ. Fla agric. Exp. Stn. tech. Bull p. 680.Google Scholar
Carroll, F. D., Rollins, W. C. & Ittner, N. R. (1955). Brahman-Hereford crossbreds and Herefords—gains, carcass yields and carcass differences. J. Anim. Sci. 14, 218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, F. D., Rollins, W. C. & Kunze, M. S. (1964). Herefords and ¼-Brahman-¾-Hereford crossbreds: comparison of carcasses and meat palatability. J.agric. Sci. Camb. 62, 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, J. W., Ramsey, C. B., Hobbs, C. S. & Temple, R. S. (1963). Effects of type and breed of British, Zebu and dairy cattle on production, palatability and composition. I. Rate of gain, feed efficiency and factors affecting market value. J. Anim. Sci. 22, 702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, J. W., Ramsey, C. B., Hobbs, C. S. & Temple, R. S. (1964). Effects of type and breed of British, Zebu and dairy cattle on production, palatability and composition. III. Percent wholesale cuts and yield of edible portion as determined by physical and chemical analysis. J. Anim. Sci. 23, 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J. (1960). Farm Animals. Their Growth, Breeding and Inheritance. London: Edward Arnold Ltd.Google Scholar
Hewetson, R. W. (1962). Dressing percentages of Brahman and Africander cross and of British breed steers. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 2, 82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, A. C. T. (1963). Carcass appraisal. J. Agric. Viet. Dep. Agric. 61, 261.Google Scholar
Hewitt, A. C. T. (1967). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Howes, J. R., Hentges, J. F., Warwick, A. C. & Cunha, T. J. (1963). Comparative growth and reproduction of Hereford and Brahman cattle in Florida. Q. J. Fla. Acad. Sci. 26, 368.Google Scholar
Manyberries Exp. Farm. Alberta (1958). Progress Report 1954–1958.Google Scholar
Mason, I. L. (1966). Hybrid vigour in beef cattle. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 34, 453.Google Scholar
Ramsey, C. B., Cole, J. W., Meyer, B. H. & Temple, R. S. (1963). Effects of type and breed of British, Zebu and dairy cattle on production, palatability and composition. II. Palatability differences and cooking losses as determined by laboratory and family panels. J. Anim. Sci. 22, 1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, C. B., Cole, J. W., Terrell, R. N. & Temple, R. S. (1965). Effect of type and breed of British, Zebu and dairy cattle on production, palatability and composition IV. Yield of gastrointestinal tract and other non-carcass components. J. Anim. Sci. 24, 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggs, J. K. (1963 a). Crossbreeding in Texas. Crossbreeding Beef Cattle. Ed. Cunha, T. J. p.122. Gainesville: Univ. of Fla.Google Scholar
Riggs, J. K. (1963 b). Effect of crossbreeding on carcass characteristics in Texas. Crossbreeding Beef Cattle. Ed. Cunha, T. J. p. 196. Gainvesville: Univ. of Fla.Google Scholar
Rollins, W. C, Carroll, F. D. & Ittner, N. R. (1964). Comparison of the performances of ¾-Hereford¼Brahman calves with Hereford calves in a variable climate. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 62, 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, W. & Mayer, B. (1966). British breeds or Brahmans? Qd agric. J. 92, 580.Google Scholar
Yeates, N. T. M. (1959). Slide rule for judging and grading beef carcasses. J. aust. Inst. agric. Sci. 25, 302.Google Scholar