Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T01:41:15.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Boron requirement and deficiency symptoms of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum–graecum) as shown in a water culture experiment with inoculation of Rhizobium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

P. Mølgaard
Affiliation:
School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY
R. Hardman
Affiliation:
School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY

Summary

This experiment was made to determine the possible reason for deficiency symptoms seen on fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) in field trials during the dry summer of 1976. Using rockwool cubes for root support, it was shown that symptoms seen in the field plants resulted from boron deficiency.

The symptoms of boron deficiency in fenugreek are described and illustrated. The main symptoms were failure offloweringor fertilization, decreased apical growth, small crisped leaves in a terminal rosette and a gradual yellowing of the lower leaves. In combination with low nitrogen, the boron-deficient plants had yellow, succulent leaves at a very early stage. High calcium and high nitrogen increased the demand for boron.

Inoculation with Rhizobium meliloti of plants with a low nitrogen supply was performed with success. The bacteria formed healthy, pink nodules on the roots inside the rockwool cubes.

The lowest content of boron in whole plants showing boron deficiency symptoms (no pods formed) was 13 μg/g and in this respect fenugreek is very similar to lucerne (Medicago sativa), a plant known to have a high boron requirement. Fenugreek has a high tolerance of excess boron.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berger, K. C. (1965). Introductory Soils 371 pp. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Chapman, M. D. (1966). Diagnostic Criteria for Plants and Soils 793 pp. University of California.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. S. & Albert, L. S. (1974). Autoradiographio examination of meristems of intact borondenoient squash roots treated with tritiated thymidine. Plant Physiology 54, 766768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eaton, F. M. (1944). Deficiency, toxicity, and accumulation of boron in plants. Journal of Agricultural Research 69, 237277.Google Scholar
Hardman, R. (1974). Steroid plants in the production of contraceptives. Journal Mondial de Pharmade 17, 6180.Google Scholar
Hardman, R. & Petropoulos, G. A. (1975). The response of Trigonella foenum-graecum (Fenugreek) to field inoculation with Bhizobium meliloti, 2012. Planta medica 27 (1), 5357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatcher, J. T. & Wilcox, L. V. (1950). Colorimetric determination of boron using carmine. Analytical Chemistry 22, 567569.Google Scholar
Hewitt, E. J. & Smith, T. A. (1975). Plant Mineral Nutrition 298 pp. London: English Universities Press.Google Scholar
Kouchi, H. (1977). Rapid cessation of mitosis and elongation of root tip cells of Vicia faba as affected by boron deficiency. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 23 (1), 113116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottino, W. Z. (1951). Borgehalt und Verteilung dea Bors inverschiedenen Pflanzen. 2. Pflanzenernähr. Dungung und Bodenkunde 55, 235247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauchelli, V. (1969). Trace Elements in Agriculture 248 pp. London: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Tanaka, H. (1967). Boron absorption by crop plants as affected by other nutrients of the Science and Plant Nutrition 13 (2), 4144.Google Scholar
Winsor, H. W. (1952). Variation in soil boron with cultivation and season. Soil Science 74, 359364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, B. (1940). Factors influencing availability of boron in soil and its distribution in plants. Soil Science 50, 209217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar