Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:14:33.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biochemical appraisal of a milk diluent for semen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

K. Friis Jakobsen  and
T. Mann
K. Friis Jakobsen
Affiliation:
A.R.C Unit of Reproductive Physiology and Biochemistry, Molteno Institute, and Department of Veterinary Clinical Studies, University of Cambridge
T. Mann
Affiliation:
A.R.C Unit of Reproductive Physiology and Biochemistry, Molteno Institute, and Department of Veterinary Clinical Studies, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. A study was made of the effects of a milk diluent on bull, ram and boar spermatozoa. Respiration and fructolysis of spermatozoa were used as the two main criteria of sperm activity. The milk diluent was a standardized and commercially available milk product, consisting of sterilized and homogenized milk, supplemented with milk fat.

2. The rate of oxygen uptake measured manometrically in the presence of air was increased by the addition of the milk diluent throughout the entire incubation period. Fructose utilization was assessed by the rate of lactic-acid production. The rate of the anaerobic lactic-acid formation was higher in the presence of the milk diluent during the later stages of incubation.

3. The effect of the milk diluent on sperm respiration was most striking in experiments with the sperm-rich portion of boar ejaculate obtained by fractionated collection. A somewhat less marked effect was observed with bull semen, and in ram semen the effect was comparatively weak.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 54 , Issue 2 , April 1960 , pp. 166 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adler, H. C. (1958 a). Annu. Rep. Ster. Res. Inst., Royal Vet.-Agric. Coll., p. 76. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Adler, H. C. (1958 b). Nord. VetMed. 10, 644.Google Scholar
Adler, H. C. & Rasbech, N. O. (1956). Nord. VetMed. 8, 497.Google Scholar
Barker, S. B. & Summerson, W. H. (1941). J. Biol. Chem. 138, 535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donné, A. (1837). Nouvelles expériences sur les animalcules spermaliquea et sur quelques une des causes de sterilité chez la femme. Paris: Les Libraires de Medecine.Google Scholar
Ehlers, M. H. & Erb, R. E. (1955). J. Dairy Sci. (Abstr.) 38, 603.Google Scholar
Flipse, R. J. & Almquist, J. O. (1958). J. Dairy Sci. 41, 1787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glover, T. & Mann, T. (1954). J. Agric. Sci. 44, 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, L. (1905). Öst. Mschr. Tierheilk. Tierzucht, 29, 1.Google Scholar
Jacquet, J. (1951). Bull. Acad. vét. Fr. 24, 429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koelliker, A. (1856). Z. wiss. Zool. 7, 201.Google Scholar
Mann, T. (1948). J. Agric. Sci. 38, 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, T. (1954). The Biochemistry of Semen. Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mihailov, N. N. (1949). Konevodstvo, 6, 14. (Anim. Breed. Abstr. 1950, 18, 24.)Google Scholar
Polge, C. (1956). Vet. Rec. 68, 62.Google Scholar
Thacker, D. L. & Almquist, J. O. (1951). J. Anim. Sci. (Abstr.) 10, 1082.Google Scholar
Umbreit, W. W., Burris, R. H. & Stauffeer, J. F. (1957). Manometric Technique, p. 275. Minn.: Burgess Publishing Co.Google Scholar